Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
da Silva, Marina Barbosa [1 ]
Ferreira, Domenica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira
Mendieta, Cristian D. [2 ]
da Silva, Hamilcar Pereira [3 ]
Nogueira-Rosa, Livia Aguiar [4 ]
Moraes-Figueiredo, Nathalia [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Barao Maua, R Ramos De Azevedo,423, BR-14090062 Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil
[2] Univ Mayor Real & Pontificia San Francisco Xavier, Sucre, Bolivia
[3] Univ Iguacu UNIG, Nucleo Educ Distancia NEAD, Curso Redes Comp, Nova Iguacu, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Estado Rio de Janeiro, Rio De Janeiro, Brazil
[5] Univ Rochester, Div Gen Neurol & Headache, Neurol, Rochester, NY USA
关键词
Galcanezumab; cluster headache; monoclonal antibody; TAC; trigeminal autonomic cephalgia;
D O I
10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundGalcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).ObjectiveWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.MethodsWe searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).ResultsA total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 +/- 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.ConclusionThis meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 76
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The efficacy and safety of buprenorphine for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Riblet, Natalie B.
    Young-Xu, Yinong
    Shiner, Brian
    Schnurr, Paula P.
    Watts, Bradley, V
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2023, 161 : 393 - 401
  • [32] The Efficacy and Safety of Brolucizumab for the Treatment of nAMD: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Chuan, Junlan
    Liu, Lianqiao
    Feng, Yumei
    Wang, Mengdan
    Li, Gang
    Lv, Qin
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [33] Efficacy and safety of baloxavir in the treatment of influenza: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Haidar, Lara
    Aboulatta, Laila Nabil Mahmoud Helmy
    Lavu, Alekhya
    Eltonsy, Sherif
    Azar, Rania
    PHARMACOEPIDEMIOLOGY AND DRUG SAFETY, 2022, 31 : 343 - 343
  • [34] Efficacy and safety of odanacatib for osteoporosis treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rongjin Chen
    Changshun Chen
    Bin Geng
    Chenhui Yang
    Hefang Xiao
    Fei Yang
    Hao Wang
    Yayi Xia
    Archives of Osteoporosis, 18
  • [35] The efficacy and safety of Zuranolone for treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fayoud, Aya M.
    Orebi, Hisham Ahmed
    Elshnoudy, Iman Abdelhady
    Elsebaie, Mai Alaaeldin Temraz
    Elewid, Mariam Mahmoud Mohamed
    Sabra, Hamdy Khaled
    PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2024, 241 (07) : 1299 - 1317
  • [36] Efficacy and safety of etanercept in the treatment of sciatica: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jing, Shangfei
    Yang, Chenyuan
    Zhang, Xiaofei
    Wen, Shuzheng
    Li, Yuankui
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2017, 44 : 69 - 74
  • [37] Efficacy and safety in the treatment of hyperprolactinemia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Fachi, Mariana Millan
    de Deus Bueno, Lays
    de Oliveira, Denise Colaco
    da Silva, Leticia Lazarin
    Bonetti, Aline F.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2021, 46 (06) : 1549 - 1556
  • [38] The Efficacy and Safety of Acupuncture in the Treatment of Neurodermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yang, Lin
    Li, Xinyun
    Huang, Wei
    Li, Jialiang
    Rao, Xiangshu
    Lai, Yu
    EVIDENCE-BASED COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE, 2022, 2022
  • [39] Efficacy and safety of metformin for melasma treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mongkhon, Pajaree
    Ruengorn, Chidchanok
    Awiphan, Ratanaporn
    Phosuya, Chabaphai
    Ruanta, Yongyuth
    Thavorn, Kednapa
    Jamjanya, Sirinda
    Chuamanochan, Mati
    Nochaiwong, Surapon
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [40] Efficacy and safety of zuranolone for the treatment of depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Zejun
    Wu, Qiuxia
    Peng, Pu
    Wu, Min
    Liu, Shouhuan
    Liu, Tieqiao
    PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2024, 331