A dyadic stress induction tool for experimental investigation of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers

被引:0
|
作者
Kim, Youngmee [1 ]
Carver, Charles S. [1 ]
Tsai, Thomas C. [1 ]
Ting, Amanda [1 ]
Spiegel, David [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Dept Psychol, 5665 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Coral Gables, FL 33146 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, 401 Quarry Rd, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
关键词
stress induction tool; close relationships; experimental design; cancer; affect; stress; cardiovascular responses; HEART-RATE-VARIABILITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL STRESS; PSYCHOSOCIAL STRESS; BREAST-CANCER; RISK; METAANALYSIS; RESPONSES; INTERVENTION; RELIABILITY; ATTACHMENT;
D O I
10.1093/abm/kaaf005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Background Medical illnesses are major stressors not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers, yet existing tools are inadequate to assess mechanistic response patterns to such stressors.Purpose We sought to validate a stress induction task that pertains to close relationships and health-related concerns with adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.Methods Patients newly diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 123, 56 years old, 34% female, 60% Hispanic, 6.5 months post-diagnosis) and their family caregivers (55 years old, 66% female, 59% Hispanic) underwent an experimental session during which both individuals imagined a scenario where one person is hit by a car (patient) and the partner (caregiver) has no means to provide or seek out help for the victim. The session consisted of 6 phases: baseline, scenario provision, speech preparation, speech by caregiver, speech by patient, and recovery.Results Results of general linear modeling with repeated measures revealed that the task induced significant affective, stress, and cardiovascular responses in both patients and caregivers. Stress reactivity and recovery patterns, however, varied by patients versus caregivers, stress induction phases, and the types of assessment.Conclusions Findings suggest the newly developed stress task as an acceptable tool for studying stress regulation in medical and family contexts. With further validation, this tool may help identify psychological and physiological pathways to improve the stress coping outcomes of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Medical illnesses are major stressors not only for the patients but also for their family caregivers. However, existing tools are inadequate to assess mechanistic response patterns to such stressors. Thus, we sought to validate a stress induction task that pertains to close relationships and health-related concerns with adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers. Patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (n = 123, 56 years old, 34% female, 60% Hispanic, 6.5 months post-diagnosis) and their family caregivers (55 years old, 66% female, 59% Hispanic) underwent an experimental session during which both individuals imagined a scenario where one person is hit by a car (patient) and the partner (caregiver) has no means to provide or seek out help for the victim. Results revealed that the task induced significant affective, stress, and cardiovascular responses in both patients and caregivers. Stress reactivity and recovery patterns, however, varied by patients versus caregivers, stress induction phases, and the types of assessment. Findings suggest the newly developed stress task as an acceptable tool for studying stress regulation in medical and family contexts. With further validation, this tool may help identify psychological and physiological pathways to improve the stress coping outcomes of adult patients with cancer and their family caregivers.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The Interaction Between Hematological Cancer Patients and Family Caregivers and Their Life Changes A Qualitative Dyadic Approach
    Serce, Ozgu
    Gunusen, Neslihan Partlak
    CANCER NURSING, 2021, 44 (04) : E201 - E208
  • [32] Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers
    Northouse, Laurel L.
    Mood, Darlene W.
    Schafenacker, Ann
    Kalemkerian, Gregory
    Zalupski, Mark
    LoRusso, Patricia
    Hayes, Daniel F.
    Hussain, Maha
    Ruckdeschel, John
    Fendrick, A. Mark
    Trask, Peter C.
    Ronis, David L.
    Kershaw, Trace
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2013, 22 (03) : 555 - 563
  • [33] Effectiveness of Dyadic Psychoeducational Intervention on Cancer Patients and Their Caregivers
    Chen, Daoming
    Liu, Qing
    Zhang, Linlin
    Qian, Hongying
    CANCER NURSING, 2023,
  • [34] Dyadic psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer and their caregivers: an update
    Tiete, Julien
    Porter, Laura S.
    CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 34 (04) : 304 - 312
  • [35] Salivary cortisol as individual and dyadic markers of stress and health among colorectal cancer patients and their caregivers
    Kim, Youngmee
    Carver, Charles
    Shaffer, Kelly
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2015, 24 : 47 - 48
  • [36] DYADIC ASSOCIATIONS OF SELF-REGULATION WITH CARDIOVASCULAR STRESS RESPONSES AMONG PATIENTS WITH CANCER AND THEIR CAREGIVERS
    Tsai, Thomas
    Hurwitz, Barry
    Spiegel, David
    Ortega, Dayanna
    Kim, Youngmee
    PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2024, 86 (05): : A141 - A141
  • [37] Dyadic effects of family resilience on post-traumatic stress symptoms among breast cancer patients and their primary family caregivers: A cross-sectional study
    Yan, Zeping
    Zhang, Qin
    Chang, Lixia
    Liu, Ye
    Li, Yuli
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2021, 53
  • [38] THE LABYRINTH AS A TOOL TO MANAGE STRESS OF EMPLOYED FAMILY CAREGIVERS
    Rudebock, C.
    Powers, M.
    Murray, C.
    Allen, J.
    Shadden, B.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 332 - 332
  • [39] FAMILY CONFLICT AND STRESS AMONG ADULT CHILD CAREGIVERS
    Kwak, M.
    Ingersoll-Dayton, B.
    Kim, J.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2009, 49 : 431 - 431
  • [40] Stress associated with tasks for family caregivers of patients with cancer in Hong Kong
    Chan, CWH
    Chang, AM
    CANCER NURSING, 1999, 22 (04) : 260 - 265