INVERSE UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION FOR SUBCHANNEL CODE WITH PSBT EXPERIMENTAL BENCHMARK

被引:0
|
作者
Luo Hanyu [1 ,2 ]
Liu Xiaojing [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Nucl Sci & Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Nucl Power Inst China, Chengdu 610213, Peoples R China
关键词
inverse uncertainty quantification; MCMC; Subchannel program; PSBT benchmark; PARAMETERS; MODEL;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Inverse uncertainty quantification analysis for subchannel programs has been conducted to decide uncertainty distribution of important model parameters based on the modified Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm using the PSBT void fraction experiment. The posterior probability distribution expression for input parameter uncertainty can be derived using Bayesian principles, typically representing a proportional relationship. However, obtaining the direct normalization coefficient proves challenging, prompting the use of the MCMC algorithm to address this issue. Given the substantial external forward program calculations associated with stochastic methods, the Back-propagation Neural Network (BPNN) is employed to construct a surrogate model, serving as a substitute for intricate forward calculations. To significantly enhance the precision of the surrogate model, an adaptive approach based on relative entropy minimization is implemented to densify training sample points. The uncertainty of key input model parameters (slip ratio and turbulent mixing coefficient) was quantified, revealing that the uncertainty of the slip ratio is the primary source of void fraction uncertainty. After obtaining information on input parameter uncertainty, forward uncertainty analysis based on input uncertainty was conducted. The resulting uncertainty band for void fraction was obtained under a tolerance limit of 95%-95%. The results indicate that the uncertainty band effectively envelops the experimental data for void fraction. Using the statistical mean of parameter uncertainty obtained, the baseline values were calibrated. The predicted results of the model correction values were found to be more accurate than those of the baseline predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Inverse flow prediction using ensemble PINNs and uncertainty quantification
    Soibam, Jerol
    Aslanidou, Ioanna
    Kyprianidis, Konstantinos
    Fdhila, Rebei Bel
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2024, 226
  • [32] On forward and inverse uncertainty quantification for models involving hysteresis operators
    Klein, Olaf
    Davino, Daniele
    Visone, Ciro
    MATHEMATICAL MODELLING OF NATURAL PHENOMENA, 2020, 15
  • [33] Comparison of inverse uncertainty quantification methods for critical flow test
    Domitr, Pawel
    Wlostoski, Mateusz
    Laskowski, Rafal
    Jurkowski, Romuald
    ENERGY, 2023, 263
  • [34] A fast inverse approach for the quantification of set-theoretical uncertainty
    Bogaerts, Lars
    Faes, Matthias
    Moens, David
    2019 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI 2019), 2019, : 768 - 775
  • [35] Uncertainty quantification of inverse analysis for geomaterials using probabilistic programming
    Zhao, Hongbo
    Li, Shaojun
    Zang, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Xinyi
    Zhang, Lin
    Ren, Jiaolong
    JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, 2024, 16 (03) : 895 - 908
  • [36] A unified framework for multilevel uncertainty quantification in Bayesian inverse problems
    Nagel, Joseph B.
    Sudret, Bruno
    PROBABILISTIC ENGINEERING MECHANICS, 2016, 43 : 68 - 84
  • [37] Uncertainty Quantification and Experimental Design for Large-Scale Linear Inverse Problems under Gaussian Process Priors
    Travelletti, Cedric
    Ginsbourger, David
    Linde, Niklas
    SIAM-ASA JOURNAL ON UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION, 2023, 11 (01): : 168 - 198
  • [38] Functional PCA and deep neural networks-based Bayesian inverse uncertainty quantification with transient experimental data
    Xie, Ziyu
    Yaseen, Mahmoud
    Wu, Xu
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2024, 420
  • [39] Uncertainty quantification for the first-cycle modeling and simulations of the BEAVRS benchmark problem
    Wan, Chenghui
    Cao, Liangzhi
    Wu, Hongchun
    ANNALS OF NUCLEAR ENERGY, 2019, 133 : 378 - 386
  • [40] Hierarchical benchmark case study for history matching, uncertainty quantification and reservoir characterisation
    Arnold, D.
    Demyanov, V.
    Tatum, D.
    Christie, M.
    Rojas, T.
    Geiger, S.
    Corbett, P.
    COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2013, 50 : 4 - 15