Inequity of access to contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with chronic kidney disease: A survey from the British Society of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

被引:0
|
作者
Moody, William E. [1 ,2 ]
Khan-Kheil, Ayisha Mehtab [3 ]
Naneishvili, Tamara [2 ]
Hudsmith, Lucy E. [2 ]
Captur, Gabriella [4 ]
Treibel, Thomas A. [5 ,6 ]
Sado, Daniel [7 ]
Fairbairn, Timothy [8 ]
Mccann, Gerry P. [9 ,10 ]
Myerson, Saul G. [11 ]
Berry, Colin
Westwood, Mark [6 ]
Keenan, Niall G.
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, Coll Med & Dent Sci, Edgbaston, England
[2] Univ Hosp Birmingham NHS Fdn Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hosp Birmingham, Dept Cardiol, Edgbaston, England
[3] New Cross Hosp, Wolverhampton Heart & Lung Ctr, Wolverhampton, England
[4] Royal Free London NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[5] UCL, Inst Cardiovasc Sci, London, England
[6] St Bartholomews Hosp, Barts Heart Ctr, London, England
[7] Kings Coll Hosp London, London, England
[8] Liverpool Heart & Chest Hosp, Liverpool, England
[9] Univ Leicester, Dept Cardiovasc Sci, Leicester, England
[10] Glenfield Hosp, NIHR Leicester Biomed Res Ctr, Leicester, England
[11] Univ Oxford, Div Cardiovasc Med, Radcliffe Dept Med, Oxford, England
关键词
Gadolinium-based contrast agent; Chronic kidney disease; Cardiovascular magnetic resonance; Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis; NEPHROGENIC SYSTEMIC FIBROSIS; GADOLINIUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.jocmr.2025.101846
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives: To examine the provision of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) using gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: An electronic survey was sent to the service leads of all CMR units in the UK in October 2022 requesting information on current departmental protocols and practices. Results: A response rate of 55% was achieved from the 82 UK CMR units surveyed. There were no known cases of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) reported within the past 10 years. Just under half the centers (22 out of 45, 49%) routinely require an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in patients before performing contrast-enhanced CMR. Conversely, 18% (8/45) of units do not check eGFR, 20% (9/45) only require an eGFR in patients aged >65 years, while 33% (15/45) assess eGFR in patients known to have CKD. All centers use group II GBCAs: the majority (36/45, 80%) favoring gadobutrol (Gadovist), while gadoterate meglumine (Dotarem) is used in most of the remaining units (8/45, 18%). One in five centers (9/45, 20%) do not currently offer contrast-enhanced CMR to patients with an eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m(2). Of the CMR units that do offer contrast to this group of patients, 28% (10/36) do not obtain consent for the risk of NSF. Conclusion: One in five centers across the UK does not offer contrast-enhanced CMR to patients with stage 4 and 5 CKD. This finding serves as a call for updated guidance with the intention of standardizing care.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) guidelines for reporting cardiovascular magnetic resonance examinations
    Hundley, W. Gregory
    Bluemke, David A.
    Bogaert, Jan
    Flamm, Scott D.
    Fontana, Marianna
    Friedrich, Matthias G.
    Grosse-Wortmann, Lars
    Karamitsos, Theodoros D.
    Kramer, Christopher M.
    Kwong, Raymond Y.
    McConnell, Michael
    Nagel, Eike
    Neubauer, Stefan
    Nijveldt, Robin
    Pennell, Dudley J.
    Petersen, Steffen E.
    Raman, Subha, V
    van Rossum, Albert
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2022, 24 (01)
  • [22] Clinical practice of cardiovascular magnetic resonance: position statement of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
    SCMR Board of Trustees
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2019, 21 (01) : 78
  • [24] Variables associated with contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy:: Clinical implications
    Paya, Eduardo
    Marin, Francisco
    Gonzalez, Josefa
    Ramon Gimeno, Juan
    Feliu, Eloisa
    Romero, Antonio
    Ruiz-Espejo, Francisco
    Roldan, Vanessa
    Climent, Vicente
    de la Morena, Gonzalo
    Valdes, Mariano
    JOURNAL OF CARDIAC FAILURE, 2008, 14 (05) : 414 - 419
  • [25] Contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of coronary vessel wall: state of art
    Kuo, Yen-Shu
    Kelle, Sebastian
    Lee, Charlotte
    Hinojar, Rocio
    Nagel, Eike
    Botnar, Rene
    Puntmann, Valentina O.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF CARDIOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2014, 12 (02) : 255 - 263
  • [26] Erratum to: Myocardial perfusion defects in scleroderma detected by contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Gianluca Moroncini
    Nicolò Schicchi
    Giovanni Pomponio
    Magdalena Dziadzio
    Osmy Paci della Costanza
    Alessandra Pierfederici
    Lorenzo Ferretti
    Giuseppe Pupita
    Gianluca Valeri
    Giacomo Agliata
    Luca Salvolini
    Andrea Giovagnoni
    Armando Gabrielli
    La radiologia medica, 2014, 119 : 958 - 958
  • [27] Detection and quantification of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy by contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Pujadas, Sandra
    Carreras, Francesc
    Arrastio, Xabier
    Leta, Ruben
    Vila, Montserrat
    Subirana, Maria Teresa
    Bayes-Genis, Antoni
    Pons-Llado, Guillem
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE CARDIOLOGIA, 2007, 60 (01): : 10 - 14
  • [28] Prognostic value of delayed contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with reperfused acute myocardial infarction
    Regenfus, M
    Schlundt, C
    Stingl, C
    von Erffa, J
    Krähner, R
    Schmidt, M
    Hegewald, J
    Adler, W
    Pucher, B
    Daniel, WG
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 45 (03) : 288A - 288A
  • [29] Contrast media in cardiovascular magnetic resonance
    Lombardi, M
    Aquaro, G
    Favilli, B
    CURRENT PHARMACEUTICAL DESIGN, 2005, 11 (17) : 2151 - 2161
  • [30] Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of the rat kidney
    Fransen, R
    Muller, HJ
    Boer, WH
    Nicolay, K
    Koomans, HA
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 1996, 7 (03): : 424 - 430