MRI as a viable alternative to CT for 3D surgical planning of cavitary bone tumors

被引:0
|
作者
Chae, Yooseok [1 ]
Cheers, Giles Michael [1 ]
Kim, Minjoo [1 ]
Reidler, Paul [2 ]
Klein, Alexander [1 ]
Fevens, Thomas [3 ]
Holzapfel, Boris Michael [1 ]
Mayer-Wagner, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Ludwig Maximilian Univ LMU, Univ Hosp, Musculoskeletal Univ Ctr Munich MUM, Dept Orthpaed & Trauma Surg,LMU Munich, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[2] Ludwig Maximilians Univ Munchen, LMU Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, D-81377 Munich, Germany
[3] Concordia Univ, Dept Comp Sci & Software Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
Segmentation; Bone defects; CT; MRI; Imaging; Preoperative; Tumors; GIANT-CELL TUMOR; SEGMENTATION; DIAGNOSIS; CYST;
D O I
10.1016/j.mri.2025.110369
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Cavitary bone defects, defined as a volumetric loss of native bone tissue, require accurate preoperative imaging for treatment planning. While CT (computed tomography) has traditionally been the gold standard for segmentation due to its superior resolution of cortical bone, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) offers unique advantages, particularly in visualizing the soft tissue-bone interface. Furthermore, MRI eliminates the ionizing radiation associated with CT, making it an advantageous alternative, especially in the management of benign and low-grade malignant bone tumors. Despite these advantages, MRI's inherently lower spatial resolution may introduce artifacts, which can complicate segmentation accuracy. This study evaluates the feasibility of MRI as a viable alternative to CT in the preoperative planning of cavitary bone defect treatment. We analyzed CT and MRI scans from 80 patients with benign and locally aggressive primary bone tumors, generating three-dimensional (3D) models through manual segmentation in Mimics, validated using Geomagic Control X. Volumetric differences between the CT- and MRI-derived models were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired ttest. The mean volumetric difference between MRI and CT scans was 2.68 +/- 1.44 %, which was not statistically significant (p = 0.15). Additionally, multiple regression analysis examining sex, age, and diagnosis revealed no significant differences in the 3D model volumes derived from the two imaging modalities (sex: p = 0.51, age: p = 0.98, and diagnosis: p = 0.50). These results support MRI-based segmentation as a reliable, radiation-free alternative to CT, particularly when precise delineation of soft tissue boundaries is critical for surgical planning.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The accuracy and reliability of 3D CT/MRI co-registration in planning epilepsy surgery
    Tao, James X.
    Hawes-Ebersole, Susan
    Baldwin, Maria
    Shah, Sona
    Erickson, Robert K.
    Ebersole, John S.
    CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 120 (04) : 748 - 753
  • [22] Quantitative 3D sodium MRI of brain tumors
    Ouwerkerk, R
    Pomper, MG
    Bottomley, PA
    RADIOLOGY, 2001, 221 : 294 - 294
  • [23] 3D QUANTITATIVE CT OF BONE METASTASES
    CANN, CE
    RADIOLOGY, 1992, 185 : 266 - 266
  • [24] Diagnostic Radiograph Based 3D Bone Reconstruction Framework: Application to Osteotomy Surgical Planning
    Gamage, Pavan
    Xie, Sheng Quan
    Delmas, Patrice
    Xu, Wei Liang
    MEDICAL IMAGE COMPUTING AND COMPUTER-ASSISTED INTERVENTION - MICCAI 2010, PT III, 2010, 6363 : 481 - +
  • [25] Integrating functional MRI information into conventional 3D radiotherapy planning of CNS tumors. Is it worth it?
    Kovacs, Arpad
    Toth, Lilla
    Glavak, Csaba
    Liposits, Gabor
    Hadjiev, Janaki
    Antal, Gergely
    Emri, Miklos
    Vandulek, Csaba
    Repa, Imre
    JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY, 2011, 105 (03) : 629 - 637
  • [26] Integrating functional MRI information into conventional 3D radiotherapy planning of CNS tumors. Is it worth it?
    Árpád Kovács
    Lilla Tóth
    Csaba Glavák
    Gábor Liposits
    Janaki Hadjiev
    Gergely Antal
    Miklós Emri
    Csaba Vandulek
    Imre Repa
    Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 2011, 105 : 629 - 637
  • [27] Lossless compression of 3D MRI and CT data
    Klappenecker, A
    May, FU
    Beth, T
    WAVELET APPLICATIONS IN SIGNAL AND IMAGE PROCESSING VI, 1998, 3458 : 140 - 149
  • [28] 3D surgical planning and navigation for CMF surgery
    Chapuis, J
    Rudolph, T
    Borgesson, B
    De Momi, E
    Pappas, IP
    Hallermann, W
    Schramm, A
    Caversaccio, M
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2004: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND DISPLAY, 2004, 5367 : 403 - 410
  • [29] 3D Boolean operations in virtual surgical planning
    Charton, Jerome
    Laurentjoye, Mathieu
    Kim, Youngjun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2017, 12 (10) : 1697 - 1709
  • [30] 3D surgical planning in patients affected by lipodystrophy
    Perez-Carrasco, J. A.
    Acha, B.
    Gomez-Cia, T.
    Lopez-Garcia, R. A.
    Delgado, Carlos
    Serrano, C.
    COMPUTERIZED MEDICAL IMAGING AND GRAPHICS, 2015, 40 : 128 - 137