Reciprocity towards nature in the biodiversity science-policy interface

被引:0
|
作者
Diaz, Sandra [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pascual, Unai [5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Consejo Nacl Invest Cient & Tecn, Inst Multidisciplinario Biol Vegetal IMBIV, Cordoba, Argentina
[2] Univ Nacl Cordoba, Fac Ciencias Exactas Fis & Nat, Cordoba, Argentina
[3] Univ Oxford, Leverhulme Ctr Nat Recovery, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Environm Change Inst, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
[5] Basque Ctr Climate Change BC3, Leioa, Spain
[6] Basque Fdn Sci, Ikerbasque, Bilbao, Spain
关键词
biodiversity conservation; IPBES; nature's contributions to people; people-nature relationships; people's contributions to nature; practices of care; values of nature; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; PEOPLE; VALUES;
D O I
10.1002/pan3.70033
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
The notion of reciprocity between humans and the rest of the living world is receiving increasing attention in the environmental sciences and science-policy international bodies. Here we first discuss different meanings of reciprocity, then we discuss this notion in relation to the conceptual framework of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), to date the most prominent international mechanism informing the science-policy interface on living nature. We show that the notion of human-nature reciprocity is recognized and is explicitly included in the IPBES conceptual framework. However, to date, it has received comparatively little attention. To overcome this, we argue that, rather than creating new separate ad-hoc categories that risk compromising the internal consistency and pluralism of the IPBES conceptual framework, co-created across different disciplines, worldviews and policy frames, a more fruitful path would be to interpret all its components in a reciprocity light, with stronger emphasis on the human shaping of, and practices of care towards the rest of the living world. Such attention to reciprocity should contribute to the evolution of IPBES and related science-policy initiatives, by incorporating a plurality of perspectives, while still maintaining the framework operational by the continued engagement of multiple disciplines and stakeholders. In terms of policy and action, this would involve more attention to pre-existing practices of care for nature-of which we provide a few illustrative examples-and new practices inspired by them or created afresh.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Historical responsibility for climate change: science and the science-policy interface
    Friman, Mathias
    Strandberg, Gustav
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2014, 5 (03) : 297 - 316
  • [32] An overview of the science-policy interface among climate change, biodiversity, and terrestrial land use for production landscapes
    Thompson, Ian D.
    JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2015, 20 (05) : 423 - 429
  • [33] Transformative science-policy interfacing: the case of biodiversity and ecosystem services
    Sarkki, Simo
    Young, Juliette C.
    Vandewalle, Marie
    Heikkinen, Hannu I.
    Norum, Roger
    Stenseke, Marie
    Nesshoever, Carsten
    Wittmer, Heidi
    SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2025, 20 (01) : 231 - 249
  • [34] Strengthening the science-policy interface in the climate migration field
    Hoffmann, Roman
    Vinke, Kira
    Sedova, Barbora
    INTERNATIONAL MIGRATION, 2023, 61 (05) : 75 - 97
  • [35] Understanding and managing trust at the climate science-policy interface
    Lacey, Justine
    Howden, Mark
    Cvitanovic, Christopher
    Colvin, R. M.
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [36] Evaluating the science-policy interface for climate change research
    Jones, Sharon A.
    Fischhoff, Baruch
    Lach, Denise
    Climatic Change, 43 (03): : 581 - 599
  • [37] Communication on the Science-Policy Interface: An Overview of Conceptual Models
    Sokolovska, Nataliia
    Fecher, Benedikt
    Wagner, Gert G.
    PUBLICATIONS, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [38] The science-policy interface on ecosystems and people: challenges and opportunities
    Balvanera, Patricia
    Jacobs, Sander
    Nagendra, Harini
    O'Farrell, Patrick
    Bridgewater, Peter
    Crouzat, Emilie
    Dendoncker, Nicolas
    Goodwin, Sean
    Gustafsson, Karin M.
    Kadykalo, Andrew N.
    Krug, Cornelia B.
    van Matuk, Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk
    Pandit, Ram
    Sala, Juan Emilio
    Schroeter, Matthias
    Washbourne, Carla-Leanne
    ECOSYSTEMS AND PEOPLE, 2020, 16 (01) : 345 - 353
  • [39] Uncertainty matters: Computer models at the science-policy interface
    Brugnach, Marcela
    Tagg, Andrew
    Keil, Florian
    de Lange, Wim J.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2007, 21 (07) : 1075 - 1090
  • [40] Disease transmission and control modelling at the science-policy interface
    McCabe, Ruth
    Donnelly, Christl A.
    INTERFACE FOCUS, 2021, 11 (06)