Risk perception and safety behaviors in high-risk workers: A systematic literature review

被引:0
|
作者
Priolo, Giulia [1 ]
Vignoli, Michela [2 ]
Nielsen, Karina [3 ]
机构
[1] Copenhagen Business Sch, Dept Management Soc & Commun, Dalgas Have 15, DK-2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark
[2] Univ Trento, Dept Psychol & Cognit Sci, Corso Bettini 31, I-38068 Rovereto, TN, Italy
[3] Univ Sheffield, Management Sch, Conduit Rd, Sheffield S10 1FL, England
关键词
Risk perception; Safety behaviors; Review; Front-line workers; High-risk occupations; HEALTH-CARE WORKERS; ORGANIZATIONAL-FACTORS; CONSTRUCTION WORKERS; WORKPLACE SAFETY; NURSES USE; MODEL; PROTECTION; KNOWLEDGE; ATTITUDES; FARMERS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106811
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The pervasive issue of occupational safety poses a compelling challenge within the global workforce causing a staggering amount of yearly injuries and fatalities worldwide. The relationship between risk perception and behaviors is of particular interest across various fields, but a comprehensive understanding of this association in the occupational sector is lacking. This systematic review examines the literature on the relationship between risk perception and safety behaviors among front-line workers in high-risk occupations for physical injuries. Using the PRISMA method, 89 peer-reviewed papers from the last two decades were synthesized. The findings revealed a common oversight in recognizing the multidimensional nature of risk perception as only seven out of 89 papers considered both its deliberative (i.e., perceived probability and severity of incurring a hazard's negative consequences) and affective (i.e., emotional reactions associated with the hazard) dimensions. Despite this, a majority of studies found a significant positive association between risk perception and safety behaviors, although 40% reported mixed or null effects. Individual factors (e.g., attitudes) and organizational factors (e.g., safety climate) were explored as potential mediators with mixed outcomes, while group and leadership factors were largely neglected. This review provides guidelines for more comprehensive future assessments of risk perception in the workplace. Enhancing the understanding of both deliberative and affective dimensions of risk perception is essential for developing effective training programs to improve safety behaviors.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Safety of teplizumab in patients with high-risk for diabetes mellitus type 1: A systematic review
    Buddhavarapu, Venkata
    Dhillon, Gagandeep
    Grewal, Harpreet
    Sharma, Pranjal
    Kashyap, Rahul
    Surani, Salim
    WORLD JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2024, 15 (08)
  • [22] Revictimization as a high-risk factor for development of posttraumatic stress disorder: a systematic review of the literature
    Cividanes, Giuliana C.
    Mello, Andrea F.
    Mello, Marcelo F.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2019, 41 (01) : 82 - 89
  • [23] The Influence of Neurocognitive Impairment on HIV Risk Behaviors and Intervention Outcomes among High-Risk Substance Users: A Systematic Review
    Shrestha, Roman
    Copenhaver, Michael
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 4
  • [24] Trends in High-Risk Sexual Behaviors among General Population Groups in China: A Systematic Review
    Cai, Rui
    Richardus, Jan Hendrik
    Looman, Caspar W. N.
    de Vlas, Sake J.
    PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (11):
  • [25] Risk Perception and Safety Compliance of Construction Workers
    Xia, N. N.
    Wang, X. Q.
    Ni, W.
    Liu, X.
    2016 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2016, : 466 - 470
  • [26] Meningococcal carriage in high-risk settings: A systematic review
    Peterson, Meagan E.
    Mile, Rebecca
    Li, You
    Nair, Harish
    Kyaw, Moe H.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2018, 73 : 109 - 117
  • [27] Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
    Tilburt, Jon C.
    James, Katherine M.
    Sinicrope, Pamela S.
    Eton, David T.
    Costello, Brian A.
    Carey, Jantey
    Lane, Melanie A.
    Ehlers, Shawna L.
    Erwin, Patricia J.
    Nowakowski, Katherine E.
    Murad, Mohammad H.
    HEREDITARY CANCER IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 9
  • [28] Factors Influencing Cancer Risk Perception in High Risk Populations: A Systematic Review
    Jon C Tilburt
    Katherine M James
    Pamela S Sinicrope
    David T Eton
    Brian A Costello
    Jantey Carey
    Melanie A Lane
    Shawna L Ehlers
    Patricia J Erwin
    Katherine E Nowakowski
    Mohammad H Murad
    Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, 9
  • [29] Safety and Risk Management Interventions in Hospitals A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Duckers, Michel
    Faber, Marjan
    Cruijsberg, Juliette
    Grol, Richard
    Schoonhoven, Lisette
    Wensing, Michel
    MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW, 2009, 66 (06) : 90S - 119S
  • [30] Workers' compensation safety net in a high-risk board provides industry
    Makarowski, D
    ADVANCES IN PORK PRODUCTION, VOL 13, 2002, : 197 - 198