Evaluation of debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to abutments of different designs and surface treatments

被引:0
|
作者
Khalifa, Ahmed Abdel Latif [1 ]
Metwally, Nayrouz Adel [2 ]
Khamis, Mohamed Moataz [2 ]
机构
[1] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Clin Master Oral Implantol Program, Alexandria, Egypt
[2] Alexandria Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Alexandria, Egypt
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY | 2025年 / 133卷 / 01期
关键词
RETENTIVE STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.026
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Straight preparable abutments provide an alternative to titanium bases (Ti- bases) for single-unit screw-retained implant-supported restorations. However, the debonding force between crowns with a screw access channel cemented to preparable abutments and Ti-bases of different designs and surface treatments is unclear. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the debonding force of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to straight preparable abutments and Ti- bases of different designs and surface treatments. Material and methods. Forty laboratory implant analogs (Straumann Bone Level) were embedded into epoxy resin blocks that were randomly divided into 4 groups (n=10 each) according to the abutment type used: CEREC group, Variobase group, airborne-particle abraded Variobase group, and airborne-particle abraded straight preparable abutment group. All specimens were restored with lithium disilicate crowns and cemented with resin cement to the corresponding abutments. They were thermocycled (from 5 to 55 degrees C for 2000 cycles) followed by cyclic loading (120 000 cycles). The tensile forces required to debond the crowns from the corresponding abutments were measured (N) by using a universal testing machine. The ShapiroeWilk test of normality was used. Comparison between the study groups was done with 1-way ANOVA (a=.05). Results. Tensile debonding force values were significantly different according to the type of abutment used (P<.05). The highest retentive force value was recorded in the straight preparable abutment group (928.1 +/- 222.2 N) followed by the airborne-particle abraded Variobase group (852.6 +/- 164.6 N), and the CEREC group (498.8 +/- 136.6 N); the lowest value was reported in the Variobase group (158.6 +/- 85.2 N). Conclusions. The retention of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to airborne-particle abraded straight preparable abutments is significantly higher than to non-surface treated Ti-bases and similar to airborne-particle abraded ones. Abrading abutments with 50-mm Al2O3 significantly increased the debonding force of the lithium disilicate crowns. (J Prosthet Dent 2025;133:215-20)
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 220
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Evaluation of the masking ability, marginal adaptation, and fracture resistance of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to titanium bases versus preparable abutments
    Kordi, Ahmad Waled Mohamad
    Salman, Abdallah Ibrahim
    Metwally, Nayrouz Adel
    Khamis, Mohamed Moataz
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Evaluation of the masking ability, marginal adaptation, and fracture resistance of screw-retained lithium disilicate implant-supported crowns cemented to titanium bases versus preparable abutments
    Ahmad Waled Mohamad Kordi
    Abdallah Ibrahim Salman
    Nayrouz Adel Metwally
    Mohamed Moataz Khamis
    BMC Oral Health, 23
  • [3] Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Loads of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Crowns
    Camatta, Hercules Pessin
    Ferreira, Rodrigo Melim
    Ferrairo, Brunna Mota
    Strelhow, Samira Sandy
    Rubo, Jose Henrique
    Mori, Aline Akemi
    Ferruzzi, Fernanda
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2021, 30 (08): : 690 - 697
  • [4] Aging and Fracture Resistance of Screw-Retained Implant-Supported Molar Crowns Fabricated from Lithium Disilicate Containing Virgilite
    Rauch, Angelika
    Schmid, Alois
    Schmidt, Michael Benno
    Schmutzler, Anne
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Rosentritt, Martin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS, 2024, 37 (04) : 453 - 456
  • [5] The use of monolithic lithium disilicate for posterior screw-retained implant crowns
    Mobilio, Nicola
    Catapano, Santo
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2017, 118 (06): : 703 - 705
  • [6] Alternative technique for investing abutments for screw-retained implant-supported restorations
    Ganddini, MR
    Tallents, RH
    JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2004, 92 (05): : 504 - 505
  • [7] Marginal discrepancy of screw-retained and cemented metal-ceramic crowns on implant abutments
    Keith, SE
    Miller, BH
    Woody, RD
    Higginbottom, FL
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 1999, 14 (03) : 369 - 378
  • [8] Effect of different tightening protocols on the probability of survival of screw-retained implant-supported crowns
    Fardin, Vinicius P.
    Bergamo, Edmara T. P.
    Bordin, Dimorvan
    Hirata, Ronaldo
    Bonfante, Estevam A.
    Bonfante, Gerson
    Coelho, Paulo G.
    JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICAL BEHAVIOR OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS, 2022, 126
  • [9] Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results
    Claudio Cacaci
    Friederike Cantner
    Thomas Mücke
    Peter Randelzhofer
    Jan Hajtó
    Florian Beuer
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2017, 21 : 1953 - 1959
  • [10] Clinical performance of screw-retained and cemented implant-supported zirconia single crowns: 36-month results
    Cacaci, Claudio
    Cantner, Friederike
    Muecke, Thomas
    Randelzhofer, Peter
    Hajto, Jan
    Beuer, Florian
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2017, 21 (06) : 1953 - 1959