Determination of Renewable Energy Growth Using Cluster Analysis and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods

被引:0
|
作者
Sevgi, Esiyok [1 ]
Figen, Antmen Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Inst Social Sci, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
[2] Cukurova Univ, Engn Fac, Dept Ind Engn, TR-01790 Adana, Turkiye
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
sustainability; renewable energy; cluster analysis; MCDM methods; CRITIC; COPRAS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; MCDM; PRIORITIZATION; ALTERNATIVES; SELECTION; TURKEY; TRADE; MODEL;
D O I
10.3390/app15031575
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Energy plays an important role in both the economic and social development of countries and is a critical factor in human life. The high consumption of fossil fuels in energy production leads to serious environmental problems such as increasing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions that lead to global warming and climate change. Many countries around the world have actively turned to renewable energy or sustainable energy sources in order to cope with the environmental crises caused by climate change. In this study, the renewable energy use performance of OECD countries in terms of sustainable development is evaluated. In the study, 38 countries were divided into three clusters for each year with the 13 variable K-means algorithm for the years 2018-2022. The criteria of the countries in the determined clusters were weighted with the CRITIC (Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation) method for each year during the study period. Countries with weighted criteria were ranked separately for each year within their own clusters using the COPRAS method. With these rankings, it is understood that the biggest share in achieving T & uuml;rkiye's "Net Zero 2053" targets among OECD countries is the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Visual impact assessment of renewable energy developments with the application of multi-criteria decision-making method
    Sepida Darabi
    Seyed Masoud Monavari
    Seyed Ali Jozi
    Raziyeh Rahimi
    Alireza Vafaeinejad
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2023, 25 : 4437 - 4451
  • [42] A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management
    Kabir, Golam
    Sadiq, Rehan
    Tesfamariam, Solomon
    STRUCTURE AND INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, 2014, 10 (09) : 1176 - 1210
  • [43] A Comparison of the Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods for the Selection of Researchers
    Kaya, Gulsum Kubra
    Ozturk, Fatih
    INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING IN THE INTERNET-OF-THINGS WORLD, GJCIE 2020, 2022, : 147 - 159
  • [44] Stochastic multi-criteria decision-making: an overview to methods and applications
    Erkan Celik
    Muhammet Gul
    Melih Yucesan
    Suleyman Mete
    Beni-Suef University Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 8
  • [45] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Hodgett, Richard Edgar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2016, 85 (5-8): : 1145 - 1157
  • [46] Comparison of multi-criteria decision-making methods for equipment selection
    Richard Edgar Hodgett
    The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 85 : 1145 - 1157
  • [47] Determination of Critical Component Failure in Thermal Power Station by Using Multi-criteria Decision-Making Methods
    Patel, Rakesh Kumar
    Dwivedi, Ravi. K.
    JOURNAL OF FAILURE ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 2020, 20 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [48] SUBJECTIVE MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING
    ESHRAGH, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MAN-MACHINE STUDIES, 1980, 13 (01): : 117 - 141
  • [49] Vague Set Methods of Multi-criteria Fuzzy Decision-making
    Yan, Ruixia
    Zheng, Jianguo
    Wang, Xiang
    2010 CHINESE CONTROL AND DECISION CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-5, 2010, : 658 - 661
  • [50] Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods in Bipolar Fuzzy Environment
    Alghamdi, M. A.
    Alshehri, Noura Omair
    Akram, Muhammad
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2018, 20 (06) : 2057 - 2064