Pitfalls in interpreting calibration in comparative evaluations of risk models for precision lung cancer screening

被引：0

作者：

Brenner, Hermann ^{[1
,2
]}

Frick, Clara ^{[1
,3
]}

Seum, Teresa ^{[1
,3
]}

Bhardwaj, Megha ^{[1
,2
]}

机构：

[1] German Canc Res Ctr, Div Clin Epidemiol & Aging Res, Heidelberg, Germany

[2] German Canc Res Ctr, German Canc Consortium DKTK, Heidelberg, Germany

[3] Heidelberg Univ, Heidelberg Med Fac, Heidelberg, Germany

来源：

NPJ PRECISION ONCOLOGY | 2024年 / 8卷 / 01期

基金：

欧盟地平线“2020”;

关键词：

PROSPECTIVE COHORT; PARTICIPANTS; MORTALITY;

D O I：

10.1038/s41698-024-00785-6

中图分类号：

R73 [肿瘤学];

学科分类号：

100214 ;

摘要：

Lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography reduces lung cancer mortality, but reliable risk-based selection of participants is crucial to maximize benefits and minimize harms. Multiple risk models have been developed for this purpose, and their discrimination and calibration performance is commonly evaluated based on large-scale cohort studies. Using a recent comparative evaluation of 10 risk models as an example, we illustrate the merits, limitations and pitfalls of such evaluations.

引用

页数：3

共 50 条

[1] Comparative performance of lung cancer risk models to define lung screening eligibility in the United Kingdom
Hilary A. Robbins
Karine Alcala
Anthony J. Swerdlow
Minouk J. Schoemaker
Nick Wareham
Ruth C. Travis
Philip A. J. Crosbie
Matthew Callister
David R. Baldwin
Rebecca Landy
Mattias Johansson
British Journal of Cancer, 2021, 124 : 2026 - 2034
[2] Comparative Performance of Lung Cancer Risk Models to Define Lung Screening Eligibility in the United Kingdom
Robbins, H.
Alcala, K.
Swerdlow, A.
Schoemaker, M.
Wareham, N.
Key, T.
Travis, R.
Brennan, P.
Crosbie, P.
Callister, M.
Baldwin, D.
Landy, R.
Johansson, M.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : S480 - S480
[3] Comparative performance of lung cancer risk models to define lung screening eligibility in the United Kingdom
Robbins, Hilary A.
Alcala, Karine
Swerdlow, Anthony J.
Schoemaker, Minouk J.
Wareham, Nick
Travis, Ruth C.
Crosbie, Philip A. J.
Callister, Matthew
Baldwin, David R.
Landy, Rebecca
Johansson, Mattias
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2021, 124 (12) : 2026 - 2034
[4] BIOMARKERS AND RISK MODELS FOR LUNG CANCER SCREENING
Field, J. K.
Raji, O. Y.
Davies, M. P.
Liloglou, T.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 7 (06) : S21 - S21
[5] Pearls and Pitfalls in Lung Cancer CT Screening
Godoy, Myrna C. B.
Dal Lago, Eduardo A.
Dalla Pria, Hanna R. Ferreira
Shroff, Girish S.
Strange, Chad D.
Truong, Mylene T.
SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2022, 43 (03) : 246 - 256
[6] Risk models to select high risk candidates for lung cancer screening
Schabath, Matthew B.
ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (03)
[7] Lung Cancer Screening and Precision Oncology
Bates, Susan E.
Peters, James J.
SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 49 (3-4) : 189 - 190
[8] A narrative review of risk prediction models for lung cancer screening
Dezube, Aaron R.
Jaklitsch, Michael T.
CURRENT CHALLENGES IN THORACIC SURGERY, 2023, 5
[9] Improving Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening With Risk Prediction Models
Tammemaegi, Martin C.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2018, 169 (01) : 54 - 55
[10] Application of Risk Prediction Models to Lung Cancer Screening A Review
Tammemaegi, Martin C.
JOURNAL OF THORACIC IMAGING, 2015, 30 (02) : 88 - 100

← 1 2 3 4 5 →