Soft-tissue volume augmentation using a connective tissue graft and a volume-stable collagen matrix with polydeoxyribonucleotide for immediate implant placement: a pilot study in a dog model

被引:1
|
作者
Lee, Han-kyu [1 ]
Hong, Ji-Youn [2 ]
Shin, Seung-Il [2 ]
Herr, Yeek [2 ]
Lim, Hyun-Chang [2 ]
Chung, Jong-Hyuk [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept Dent, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ Med Ctr, Coll Dent, Periodontal Implant Clin Res Inst, Dept Periodontol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Alveolar ridge augmentation; Animal model; Autografts; Polydeoxyribonucleotide; Tissue scaffolds; ANTERIOR MAXILLA; TOOTH EXTRACTION; SITES; ANGIOGENESIS; STABILITY; OUTCOMES; HARD;
D O I
10.5051/jpis.2400240012
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The aims of this study were 1) to investigate the effects of a subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) and a volume-stable collagen matrix (VCMX) on soft-tissue volume gain in the immediate implant placement protocol, and 2) to determine whether polydeoxyribonucleotide (PDRN) can enhance the effects ofa VCMX. Methods: Dental implants were placed in 4 mongrel dogs immediately after extracting the distal roots of their third and fourth mandibular premolars. The gap between the implant and the buccal bone plate was filled with synthetic bone substitute particles. The following soft-tissue augmentation modalities were applied buccally: 1) control (no augmentation), 2) SCTG, 3) VCMX, and 4) VCMX/PDRN. After 4 months, histomorphometric analysis was performed. Tissue changes were evaluated using superimposed standard tessellation language (STL) files. Results: Wound dehiscence was found in more than half of the test groups, but secondary wound healing was successfully achieved in all groups. Histomorphometrically, tissue thickness was favored in group SCTG at or above the implant platform level (IP), and group SCTG and the groups with VCMX presented similar tissue thickness below the IP. However, the differences in such thickness among the groups were minor. The keratinized tissue height was greater in group VCMX/PDRN than in groups SCTG and VCMX. Superimposing the STL files revealed a decrease in soft-tissue volume in all groups. Conclusions: Wound dehiscence after soft-tissue volume augmentation might be detrimental to obtaining the expected outcomes. PDRN appears not to have a positive effect on the soft- tissue volume gain.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 373
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Osteoconductive Properties of a Volume-Stable Collagen Matrix in Rat Calvaria Defects: A Pilot Study
    Alccayhuaman, Karol Ali Apaza
    Tangl, Stefan
    Blouin, Stephane
    Hartmann, Markus A.
    Heimel, Patrick
    Kuchler, Ulrike
    Lee, Jung-Seok
    Gruber, Reinhard
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (07)
  • [22] Efficacy of a collagen matrix for soft tissue augmentation after implant placement compared to connective tissue grafts: A multicenter, noninferiority, randomized controlled trial
    Hammerle, Christoph H. F.
    Jepsen, Karin
    Sailer, Irena
    Strasding, Malin
    Zeltner, Marco
    Cordaro, Luca
    Mirisola di Torresanto, Vincenzo
    Schwarz, Frank
    Zuhr, Otto
    Akakpo, Dodji
    Bonnet, Franck
    Sanz-Martin, Ignacio
    Thoma, Daniel S.
    Strauss, Franz J.
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2023, 34 (09) : 999 - 1013
  • [23] Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for buccal soft tissue augmentation at implant site. A randomized, controlled clinical trial
    Cairo, Francesco
    Barbato, Luigi
    Tonelli, Paolo
    Batalocco, Guido
    Pagavino, Gabriella
    Nieri, Michele
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2017, 44 (07) : 769 - 776
  • [24] Connective tissue graft vs porcine collagen matrix after immediate implant placement in esthetic area: A randomized clinical trial
    Puisys, Algirdas
    Deikuviene, Justina
    Vindasiute-Narbute, Egle
    Razukevicus, Dainius
    Zvirblis, Tadas
    Linkevicius, Tomas
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2022, 24 (02) : 141 - 150
  • [25] Immediate Implant Placement in Conjunction with Acellular Dermal Matrix or Connective Tissue Graft: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Volumetric Study
    Happe, Arndt
    Debring, Leonie
    Schmidt, Alexander
    Fehmer, Vincent
    Neugebauer, Joerg
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PERIODONTICS & RESTORATIVE DENTISTRY, 2022, 42 (03) : 380 - 390
  • [26] A Randomized Controlled Trial on the Timing of Soft-Tissue Augmentation in Immediate Implant Placement: Hard-Tissue Changes and Clinical Outcome
    Cosyn, Jan
    Struys, Thibault
    Van Hove, Pieter-Jan
    De Buyser, Stefanie
    De Bruyckere, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2024, 51 (11) : 1534 - 1544
  • [27] Soft tissue volume alterations after connective tissue grafting at teeth: the subepithelial autologous connective tissue graft versus a porcine collagen matrix - a pre-clinical volumetric analysis
    Schmitt, Christian M.
    Matta, Ragai E.
    Moest, Tobias
    Humann, Julia
    Gammel, Lisa
    Neukam, Friedrich W.
    Schlegel, Karl A.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2016, 43 (07) : 609 - 617
  • [28] Soft-Tissue Augmentation around Dental Implants with a Connective Tissue Graft (CTG) and Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix (CMX)-5-Year Follow-Up
    Hadzik, Jakub
    Blaszczyszyn, Artur
    Gedrange, Tomasz
    Dominiak, Marzena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (03)
  • [29] Xenogeneic collagen matrix versus connective tissue graft for soft tissue augmentation at immediately placed implants: a prospective clinical trial
    De Angelis, P.
    Rella, E.
    Manicone, P. F.
    Liguori, M. G.
    De Rosa, G.
    Cavalcanti, C.
    Galeazzi, N.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2023, 52 (10) : 1097 - 1105
  • [30] Clinical comparison of a xenogeneic collagen matrix versus subepithelial autogenous connective tissue graft for augmentation of soft tissue around implants
    De Angelis, P.
    De Angelis, S.
    Passarelli, P. C.
    Liguori, M. G.
    Pompa, G.
    Papi, P.
    Manicone, P. F.
    D'Addona, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 50 (07) : 956 - 963