On the extreme dependence between agricultural tokens and agricultural commodities

被引:0
|
作者
Shao, Shi-Feng [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Econ & Management, 68 Jincheng St,East Lake High Tech Dev Zone, Wuhan 430078, Hubei, Peoples R China
关键词
Agricultural tokens; agricultural commodities; quantile dependence; portfolio allocation; hedge;
D O I
10.1080/13504851.2025.2472034
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Agricultural tokens represent a significant application of blockchain technology in the agricultural sector, enhancing market liquidity and efficiency. As blockchain assets, how to hedge the market risks associated with agricultural tokens is a concern for investors. This study employs the quantile coherency method and constructs investment portfolios to minimize Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES) to explore the extreme return interrelations between agricultural tokens and traditional agricultural commodities. It also analyses the performance of agricultural commodities in hedging extreme losses of agricultural tokens. The results indicate a weak linkage between the two markets, suggesting that agricultural commodities are ideal assets for mitigating the extreme risks of agricultural tokens. The long-term coherency between assets is more potent than in the short and medium terms, and the interrelationship is even stronger under extreme conditions. Grain commodities have better hedging potential against agricultural cryptocurrencies than other soft commodities. This paper holds potential reference value for academic research and practical market operations.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] REALIZED VOLATILITY IN AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES FUTURES
    Rattanasamakarn, Tanapol
    Tansuchat, Roengchai
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH ECONOMICS & FINANCE CONFERENCE, 2018, : 158 - 169
  • [42] Forecasting realized volatility of agricultural commodities
    Degiannakis, Stavros
    Filis, George
    Klein, Tony
    Walther, Thomas
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2022, 38 (01) : 74 - 96
  • [43] ESTIMATION OF DEMAND FOR TRANSPORTATION OF AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
    MIKLIUS, W
    CASAVANT, KL
    GARROD, PV
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1976, 58 (02) : 217 - 223
  • [44] American agricultural commodities in a changing climate
    Burkhead, Tineka R.
    Klink, Vincent P.
    AIMS AGRICULTURE AND FOOD, 2018, 3 (04): : 406 - 425
  • [45] Marketing agricultural commodities internationally.
    Epstein, RL
    Wilson, C
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 215 : U47 - U48
  • [46] ACETALDEHYDE - POTENTIAL FUMIGANT FOR AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
    AHARONI, Y
    HARTSELL, PL
    YOUNG, DK
    CITRUS & VEGETABLE MAGAZINE, 1978, 41 (10): : 28 - 29
  • [47] FEDERAL PRICE SUPPORT FOR AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES
    Shields, Robert H.
    Shulman, Edward M.
    IOWA LAW REVIEW, 1949, 34 (02) : 188 - 213
  • [48] Optimal trading and shipping of agricultural commodities
    Merener, Nicolas
    Moyano, Ramiro
    Stier-Moses, Nicolas E.
    Watfi, Pablo
    JOURNAL OF THE OPERATIONAL RESEARCH SOCIETY, 2016, 67 (01) : 114 - 126
  • [49] On the Volatility Spillover between Agricultural Commodities and Latin American Stock Markets
    Candila, Vincenzo
    Farace, Salvatore
    RISKS, 2018, 6 (04):
  • [50] Market interactions between agricultural commodities and the dry bulk shipping market
    Michail, Nektarios A.
    Melas, Kostis D.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND LOGISTICS, 2021, 37 (01): : 73 - 81