Decentralized Markets and Self-Regulation

被引:0
|
作者
Guseva, Yuliya [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Law Sch, Fintech & Blockchain Res Program, Camden, NJ 08901 USA
关键词
SECURITIES; ECONOMICS; PROTECTION; DISCLOSURE; EXCHANGES; CRYPTO; STATE; LAW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
Distributed ledger technology, such as blockchains, is changing fi nancial markets by creating a new foundation for transacting with digital assets. Simultaneously, major blockchain-enabled intermediaries- crypto-exchanges-have emerged to trade, broker, and settle transactions with digital assets. U.S. regulators seek to place crypto-exchanges within the ambit of existing regulation and registration requirements for legacy intermediaries. A critical underexplored corollary of this approach is converting cryptoexchanges into legacy self-regulatory organizations ("SROs") or members of SROs. Put differently, U.S. agencies seek to bring not only conventional regulation but also self-regulation into blockchain-enabled markets. In imposing the traditional models without reform, however, policymakers simultaneously ignore the considerable economic potential of technology-enabled markets and intermediaries and fail to precisely target their risks and transaction costs. To offersolutions, thisArticle examines the digital assetmarket's structure and microstructure and associated risks. Comparing centralized crypto-exchanges, decentralized crypto-exchanges, and legacy trading venues, this Article agrees with the basic intuition to introduce formal self-regulation and refines possible self-regulatory models. The proposed frameworks aggregate the decentralized knowledge of individual participants in the global technology-enabled market to ensure better coordination and well-informed regulation. Building on market expertise, the proposed SROs would promote regulatory efficiency, improve digital asset trading, reduce the costs of coordination among heterogeneous and globally dispersed participants in blockchain-enabled markets, and nudge them toward comprehensive self-regulatory and technological solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1342
页数:62
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] ON SELF-REGULATION AND TRANSGRESSION
    SCHURMANN, R
    SOCIAL RESEARCH, 1982, 49 (04): : 1029 - 1046
  • [32] The Self-Regulation of Gambling
    Susan M. Moore
    Anna C. Thomas
    Michael Kyrios
    Glen Bates
    Journal of Gambling Studies, 2012, 28 : 405 - 420
  • [33] EMOTION AND SELF-REGULATION
    THOMPSON, RA
    NEBRASKA SYMPOSIUM ON MOTIVATION, 1990, 36 : 367 - 467
  • [34] SELF-REGULATION OF SCIENCE
    BALTIMORE, D
    TECHNOLOGY REVIEW, 1989, 92 (06) : 20 - +
  • [35] Business self-regulation
    Pearson, Gail
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW, 2012, 20 (01):
  • [36] BEWARE SELF-REGULATION
    Brown, Ian
    INDEX ON CENSORSHIP, 2010, 39 (01) : 98 - 106
  • [37] Religion and Self-Regulation
    Hou, Hui
    Wang, Benfa
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH (ICHSSR 2017), 2017, 121 : 85 - 89
  • [38] The price of self-regulation
    Bryant, Katherine
    VETERINARY TECHNICIAN, 2006, 27 (10): : 600 - 600
  • [39] Self-Regulation and Depression
    Strauman, Timothy J.
    SELF AND IDENTITY, 2002, 1 (02) : 151 - 157
  • [40] IS SELF-REGULATION POSSIBLE
    BARKENBUS, JN
    JOURNAL OF POLICY ANALYSIS AND MANAGEMENT, 1983, 2 (04) : 576 - 588