A child-centred research checklist to improve the design and reporting of paediatric research studies: A descriptive mixed methods study

被引:4
|
作者
Foster, Mandie [1 ,2 ]
Whitehead, L. Lisa [2 ,3 ]
O'Sullivan, Therese A. [4 ]
Hill, Julie [4 ]
Morelius, Evalotte [2 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Auckland Univ Technol, Sch Clin Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[2] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[3] Univ Otago, Ctr Postgrad Nursing Studies, Christchurch, New Zealand
[4] Edith Cowan Univ, Nutr & Hlth Innovat Res Inst, Sch Hlth & Med Sci, Joondalup, WA, Australia
[5] Linkopings Univ, Dept Hlth Med & Caring Sci, Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
Children; Checklist; Delphi technique; Ethics; Interdisciplinary research; Paediatric; Research; HEALTH-CARE; PARTICIPATION; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2024.104958
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: No internationally developed child-centred research checklist is currently available to enhance the quality and transparency of the development, reporting and evaluation of research undertaken with children. Objective: To develop an internationally relevant, expert informed child-centred research checklist. Design: A descriptive mixed methods study was undertaken in five sequential phases, including a Delphi component. Setting(s): Academic/international context. Methods: This study involved five sequential stages: 1. Literature review using four databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, PsycINFO) and analysis to identify key themes in child-centred research (January 2020). 2. Generate a questionnaire based on the key themes for international experts in child research to provide their opinions on what should be included in a child-centred research checklist (March 2020). 3. Inductive thematic analysis of the experts' responses to generate the initial draft checklist (June 2020). 4. The checklist progressed through three rounds of Delphi study for a wider range of experts to provide their consensus on what a child-centred research checklist should contain (August 2020-February 2021). 5. Refinement of the child-centred research checklist based on the Delphi study (March 2021-November 2022). Results: A total of 160 articles met the inclusion criteria for review and were considered in the development of a 10-item open-ended questionnaire, adapted for four age-brackets (0-1 yrs., 2-4 yrs., 5-10 yrs., >11 yrs). Responses from 14 experts across 10 countries generated 205 generic statements and 76 examples to inform a child- centred research checklist. Following this, 158 experts from eleven disciplines across 18 countries participated in the three round Delphi study (38 % retention rate over the three rounds). The final checklist includes 11 statements and 17 examples represented under three categories of "child-parent consent, assent and dissent", "code of conduct" and "child focused methods". Conclusion: The child-centred research checklist was generated from a mixed methods study undertaken in five sequential phases, with input by 172 experts from 11 disciplines across 19 countries. The child-centred research checklist is the first international, expert informed tool to support good quality and transparent child-centred research. We call on researchers, clinicians, journal editors, organisations, and ethics committees to use this checklist for future research with children. The next phase of this project is engagement with children and their families to refine the checklist. Tweetable abstract: New checklist to support good quality child research practices @IFNAorg.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Frequency of reporting on patient and public involvement (PPI) in research studies published in a general medical journal: a descriptive study
    Price, Amy
    Schroter, Sara
    Snow, Rosamund
    Hicks, Melissa
    Harmston, Rebecca
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Parker, Sam
    Richards, Tessa
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (03):
  • [22] Policies on the collection, analysis, and reporting of sex and gender in Australian health and medical research: a mixed methods study
    Carcel, Cheryl
    Vassallo, Amy
    Hallam, Laura
    Shanthosh, Janani
    Thompson, Kelly
    Halliday, Lily
    Anderst, Jacek
    Smith, Anthony K. J.
    McKenzie, Briar L.
    Newman, Christy E.
    Bennett-Brook, Keziah
    Wainer, Zoe
    Woodward, Mark
    Norton, Robyn
    Chappell, Louise
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2024, 221 (07) : 374 - 380
  • [23] How can we improve knowledge and perceptions of menstruation? A mixed-methods research study
    Moon, Gayoung
    Kim, Inkyung
    Kim, Habhin
    Choe, Suwan
    Jeon, Soyeon
    Cho, Jeonghun
    Hong, Sujeong
    Lee, Jisan
    BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [24] How can we improve knowledge and perceptions of menstruation? A mixed-methods research study
    Gayoung Moon
    Inkyung Kim
    Habhin Kim
    Suwan Choe
    Soyeon Jeon
    Jeonghun Cho
    Sujeong Hong
    Jisan Lee
    BMC Women's Health, 20
  • [25] Methods and results of studies on reporting guideline adherence are poorly reported: a meta-research study
    Dal Santo, Tiffany
    Rice, Danielle B.
    Amiri, Lara S. N.
    Tasleem, Amina
    Li, Kexin
    Boruff, Jill T.
    Geoffroy, Marie-Claude
    Benedetti, Andrea
    Thombs, Brett D.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2023, 159 : 225 - 234
  • [26] Perceptions of child death in Jigawa State, Nigeria: a mixed-methods study on how sociocultural nuances shape paediatric mortality reporting
    Andersen, Kristen Nicole
    Shittu, Funmilayo
    Magama, Abdullahi
    Ahmed, Tahlil
    Bakare, Damola
    Salako, Julius
    Burgess, Rochelle Ann
    King, Carina
    GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2022, 15 (01)
  • [27] A Platform to Develop and Apply Digital Methods for Empirical Bioethics Research: Mixed Methods Design and Development Study
    Schneider, Manuel
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2022, 6 (05)
  • [28] HOW DO MOTHERS ENGAGE WITH NEWS COVERAGE OF PAEDIATRIC INJURY RESEARCH? AN EXPLORATORY, MIXED-METHODS STUDY
    Smith, Katherine C.
    Manganello, Jennifer A.
    Roberts, Kristin
    Kaercher, Roxanne
    McKenzie, Lara
    INJURY PREVENTION, 2016, 22 : A235 - A235
  • [29] The concept of needs in child well-being research: Lessons from a mixed methods study in Germany
    Wilmes, Johanna
    Andresen, Sabine
    CHILDREN AND YOUTH SERVICES REVIEW, 2023, 150
  • [30] Ethical and policy issues in cluster randomized trials: rationale and design of a mixed methods research study
    Taljaard, Monica
    Weijer, Charles
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    Brown, Judith Belle
    Binik, Ariella
    Boruch, Robert
    Brehaut, Jamie C.
    Chaudhry, Shazia H.
    Eccles, Martin P.
    McRae, Andrew
    Saginur, Raphael
    Zwarenstein, Merrick
    Donner, Allan
    TRIALS, 2009, 10