Cross-border alliances and strategic games

被引:0
|
作者
Tlemsani, Issam [1 ]
Matthews, Robin [2 ]
Hashim, Mohamed Ashmel Mohamed [3 ]
机构
[1] TCIB, London, England
[2] Dept Consultant, Okehampton, England
[3] Cardiff Metropolitan Univ, Cardiff, Wales
关键词
Learning alliances; Game theory; Cooperative games; Payoffs; Strategic partnership; Simulation; Strategic alliances; COOPERATION; COMPETITION; COORDINATION; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1108/JWAM-04-2023-0034
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This empirical research examined the factors and conditions that contribute to the success of international strategic learning alliances. The study aimed to provide organisations with evidence-based insights and recommendations that can help them to create more effective and sustainable partnerships and to leverage collaborative learning to drive innovation and growth. The examination is performed using game theory as a mathematical framework to analyse the interaction of the decision-makers, where one alliance's decision is contingent on the decision made by others in the partnership. There are 20 possible games out of 120 outcomes that can be grouped into four different types; each type has been divided into several categories. Design/methodology/approach - The research methodology included secondary and primary data collection using empirical data, the Delphi technique for obtaining qualitative data, a research questionnaire for collecting quantitative data and computer simulation (1,000 cases, network resources and cooperative game theory). The key variables collected and measured when analysing a strategic alliance were identified, grouped and mapped into the developed model. Findings - Most respondents ranked reputation and mutual benefits in Type 1 games relatively high, averaging 4.1 and 3.85 of a possible 5. That is significantly higher than net transfer benefits, ranked at 0.61. The a priori model demonstrate that Type 1 games are the most used in cooperative games and in-game distribution, 40% of all four types of games. This is also confirmed by the random landscape model, approximately 50%. The results of the empirical data in a combination of payoff characteristics for Type 1 games show that joint and reputation benefits are critical for the success of cooperation. Practical implications - Research on cross-border learning alliances has several implications. Managerial implications can help managers to understand the challenges and benefits of engaging in these activities. They can use this knowledge to develop strategies to improve the effectiveness of their cross-border learning alliances. Practical implications, the development of game theory and cross-border models can be applied in effective decision-making in a variety of complex contexts. Learning alliances have important policy implications, particularly in trade, investment and innovation. Policymakers must consider the potential benefits and risks of these collaborations and develop policies that encourage and support them while mitigating potential negative impacts. Originality/value - International learning alliances have become a popular strategy for firms seeking to gain access to new knowledge, capabilities and markets in foreign countries. The originality of this research lies in its ability to contribute to the understanding of the dynamics and outcomes of these complex relationships in a novel and meaningful way.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 313
页数:22
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Weichai Strategic Motives Because of Cross-border Mergers and Acquisitions Analysis
    Xing, Meng
    2015 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCES IN SOCIAL SCIENCE, HUMANITIES, AND MANAGEMENT, ASSHM 2015, 2015, : 999 - 1003
  • [32] CORPORATE TAX GAMES WITH CROSS-BORDER EXTERNALITIES FROM PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE
    Dewit, Gerda
    Hynes, Kate
    Leahy, Dermot
    ECONOMIC INQUIRY, 2018, 56 (02) : 1047 - 1063
  • [33] Contract Structure in Cross-Border R&D Alliances: The Effect of Cultural Distance
    Delerue, Helene
    Cronje, Tom
    FLEXIBILITY, INNOVATION, AND ADDING VALUE AS DRIVERS OF GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS: PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTOR CHALLENGES, 2013, 22 : 127 - 134
  • [34] Kick-starting Cross-border Alliances: Approval and Clearance; the Past, the Present and the Future
    Laer, H. S. Rutger Jan Toe
    AIR & SPACE LAW, 2007, 32 (4-5): : 287 - 325
  • [35] Can Cross-border Cooperation Boost Cross-border Ethical Governance?
    Nadalutti, Elisabetta
    JCMS-JOURNAL OF COMMON MARKET STUDIES, 2020, 58 (06) : 1377 - 1392
  • [36] Cross-border topographic mapping, cross-border orienteering: the Hungarian overview
    Zentai, Laszlo
    Gercsak, Gabor
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARTOGRAPHY, 2019, 5 (2-3) : 255 - 268
  • [37] Cross-border connections
    Kutchesfahani, Sara Z.
    NUCLEAR ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 57 (692): : 38 - 38
  • [38] Cross-border LBOs
    Cao, Jerry X.
    Cumming, Douglas
    Qian, Meijun
    Wang, Xiaoming
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2015, 50 : 69 - 80
  • [39] Cross-border marketing
    Rovinescu, C
    Thieffry, G
    FUTURE FOR THE GLOBAL SECURITIES MARKET: LEGAL AND REGULATORY ASPECTS, 1996, : 31 - 68
  • [40] Cross-border biotech
    Friedman, YE
    Seline, RS
    NATURE BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2005, 23 (06) : 656 - 657