Choosing tight-binding models for accurate optoelectronic responses

被引:0
|
作者
Ghosh, Andreas [1 ]
Schankler, Aaron M. [1 ]
Rappe, Andrew M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Chem, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
OPTICAL-RESPONSE; MONOLAYER; APPROXIMATION; TRANSITION;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.111.125203
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Tight-binding models provide great insight and are a low-cost alternative to ab initio methods for calculation of a material's electronic structure. These models are used to calculate optical responses, including nonlinear optical effects such as the shift current bulk photovoltaic effect. The validity of tight-binding models is often evaluated by comparing their band structures to those calculated with density functional theory. However, we find that band structure agreement is a necessary but not sufficient condition for accurate optical response calculations. We compute the shift current response and dielectric tensor using a variety of tight-binding models of MoS2, including both Slater-Koster and Wannier tight-binding models that treat the Mo 4d orbitals and/or S 3 p orbitals. We also truncate hoppings in the Wannier function models to next-nearest-neighbor, as is common in tightbinding methods, in order to gauge the effect on optical response. By examining discrepancies in energies and optical matrix elements, we determine the interpolation quality of the different tight-binding models and establish that agreement in both band structure and wave functions is required to accurately model optical response.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] TIGHT-BINDING THEORY OF FORCE-CONSTANT MODELS
    VANSCHILFGAARDE, M
    SHER, A
    APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS, 1987, 51 (03) : 175 - 176
  • [32] Topological reduction of tight-binding models on branched networks
    Buonsante, P
    Burioni, R
    Cassi, D
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2002, 65 (05) : 1 - 8
  • [33] Anyonic tight-binding models of parafermions and of fractionalized fermions
    Rossini, Davide
    Carrega, Matteo
    Strinati, Marcello Calvanese
    Mazza, Leonardo
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2019, 99 (08)
  • [35] Anderson localization in tight-binding models with flat bands
    Chalker, J. T.
    Pickles, T. S.
    Shukla, Pragya
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2010, 82 (10)
  • [36] Tight-binding billiards
    Ulcakar, Iris
    Vidmar, Lev
    PHYSICAL REVIEW E, 2022, 106 (03)
  • [37] TIGHT-BINDING METHODS
    HARRISON, WA
    SURFACE SCIENCE, 1994, 299 (1-3) : 298 - 310
  • [38] Pressure-induced optoelectronic properties of InP nanocrystals:: Tight-binding approach
    Diaz, J. G.
    Jaskolski, W.
    Zielinski, M.
    Bryant, G. W.
    PHYSICA STATUS SOLIDI C - CURRENT TOPICS IN SOLID STATE PHYSICS, VOL 3, NO 11, 2006, 3 (11): : 3832 - +
  • [39] Accurate tight-binding Hamiltonians for two-dimensional and layered materials
    Agapito, Luis A.
    Fornari, Marco
    Ceresoli, Davide
    Ferretti, Andrea
    Curtarolo, Stefano
    Nardelli, Marco Buongiorno
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2016, 93 (12)
  • [40] Accurate and transferable extended Huckel-type tight-binding parameters
    Cerdá, J
    Soria, F
    PHYSICAL REVIEW B, 2000, 61 (12): : 7965 - 7971