Potential barriers to implementation of next-generation sequencing in cancer management: a US Physician-based survey

被引:0
|
作者
Hussain, Arif [1 ]
Szamreta, Elizabeth [2 ]
Ning, Ning [3 ]
Kaminski, Allysen [4 ]
Shah, Ruchit [4 ]
Aggarwal, Jyoti [3 ]
Adeboyeje, Gboyega [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Med, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Merck & Co Inc, Outcomes Res, Rahway, NJ USA
[3] Open Hlth, Evidence & Access, Newton, MA USA
[4] Open Hlth, Evidence & Access, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
Next-generation sequencing; genomic panel test; precision cancer medicine; clinical oncology; genetic testing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: The purpose of this study was to identify barriers to physicians' NGS use and preferred strategies to alleviate these barriers. Research Design and Methods: A cross-sectional online survey link was sent to a sample of US oncologists/hematologists, surgeons, and pathologists identified through a panel. The survey collected data, from October-December 2020, on barriers to NGS testing and potential strategies. Results: Two hundred physicians participated (mean age: 46.2years; 65% male; 80% White, mean years in clinical practice: 13.7). Despite the use of NGS testing by all physicians, 99.5% reported concerns/barriers. Reimbursement challenges were the most cited reason (87.5%), followed by lack of knowledge of NGS testing methodologies (81.0%), and lack of clinical utility evidence (80.0%). The most common reimbursement challenge was prior authorizations for NGS testing (72.0%), followed by knowledge of new fee codes for reimbursement or corresponding therapy (68.0%), and paperwork/administrative duties (67.5%). Surgeons were more likely to encounter challenges in using NGS testing than other physicians. Conclusions: The results highlight the barriers reported by oncologists/hematologists, pathologists, and surgeons, which may impact the evolving role of NGS in the context of the overall management of cancer patients. Next-generation sequencing testing has begun to have an important role in the diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and identification of appropriate targets for treatment. In this study, we surveyed oncologists/hematologists, surgeons, and pathologists to better understand the barriers to using next-generation sequencing. Reimbursement challenges were the most reported barrier. The most common reimbursement challenge was prior authorizations for next-generation testing, followed by knowledge of new fee codes for reimbursement or corresponding therapy and paperwork/administrative duties. Lack of knowledge of next-generation sequencing testing methodologies and lack of clinical utility evidence were also reported barriers. Surgeons were more likely to have challenges in using next-generation sequencing than other physicians. The results highlight the barriers reported by oncologists/hematologists, pathologists, and surgeons, which may impact the evolving role of next-generation sequencing in the clinical management of cancer patients.
引用
收藏
页码:231 / 239
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Utilizing next-generation sequencing in the management of multiple myeloma
    Lionetti, Marta
    Neri, Antonino
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2017, 17 (07) : 653 - 663
  • [42] Management of Incidental Findings in the Era of Next-generation Sequencing
    Blackburn, Heather L.
    Schroeder, Bradley
    Turner, Clesson
    Shriver, Craig D.
    Ellsworth, Darrell L.
    Ellsworth, Rachel E.
    CURRENT GENOMICS, 2015, 16 (03) : 159 - 174
  • [43] Barriers to creating the next-generation cancer registry.
    Dilts, David M.
    Chong, Steven Kunyuan
    Fiscalini, Allison Stover
    Thompson, Carlie Kennedy
    Hogarth, Mike
    Esserman, Laura
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2014, 32 (15)
  • [44] Physician adoption and molecular landscape of next-generation sequencing in breast cancer patients from community-based clinics
    Sturgill, Emma
    Misch, Amanda
    Lachs, Rebecca
    Jones, Carissa
    Schlauch, Dan
    Jones, Suzanne
    Shastry, Mythili
    Yardley, Denise
    Burris, Howard
    Spigel, David
    Hamilton, Erika
    McKenzie, Andrew
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2021, 81 (04)
  • [45] A survey of error-correction methods for next-generation sequencing
    Yang, Xiao
    Chockalingam, Sriram P.
    Aluru, Srinivas
    BRIEFINGS IN BIOINFORMATICS, 2013, 14 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [46] Survey study of barriers to evidence-based decision-making in oncology care using next-generation sequencing.
    Szamreta, Elizabeth A.
    Kaminski, Allysen
    Shah, Ruchit
    Ning, Ning
    Aggarwal, Jyoti
    Hussain, Arif
    Adeboyeje, Gboyega
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 39 (15)
  • [47] Application of next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of gastric cancer
    Moradi, Narges
    Moghadam, Solmaz Ohadian
    Heidarzadeh, Siamak
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 57 (07) : 842 - 855
  • [48] Microarray and Next-Generation Sequencing to Analyse Gastric Cancer
    Dang, Yuan
    Wang, Ying-Chao
    Huang, Qiao-Jia
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (19) : 8033 - 8039
  • [49] Applying next-generation sequencing to pancreatic cancer treatment
    Mardis, Elaine R.
    NATURE REVIEWS GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2012, 9 (08) : 477 - 486
  • [50] The clinical utility of next-generation sequencing in lung cancer
    Rozenblum, A. Belilovski
    Ilouze, M.
    Dudnik, E.
    Flex, D.
    Dvir, A.
    Soussan-Gutman, L.
    Peled, N.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2016, 11 (04) : S124 - S124