Power Consumption in SQUID Multiplexers for Space-Based Applications

被引:0
|
作者
van der Kuur, J. [1 ]
Kiviranta, M. [2 ]
de Lange, G. [1 ]
Vaccaro, D. [3 ]
de Wit, M. [3 ]
Gottardi, L. G. [3 ]
Akamatsu, H. A. [3 ,4 ]
Jackson, B. D. [1 ]
Nagayoshi, K. [3 ]
Bruijn, M. P. [3 ]
Taralli, E. [3 ]
Ravensberg, K. [3 ]
den Herder, J. W. A. [3 ]
机构
[1] SRON Netherlands Inst Space Res, NWO I, Landleven 12, NL-9747 AD Groningen, Netherlands
[2] VTT, Tietotie 3, Espoo 02150, Finland
[3] SRON Netherlands Inst Space Res, NWO I, Niels Bohrweg 4, NL-2333 CA Leiden, Netherlands
[4] QUP Int Ctr Quantum Field Measurement Syst Studies, 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 3050801, Japan
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
TES; FDM; TDM; mu MUX; Athena; Lynx;
D O I
10.1007/s10909-024-03228-5
中图分类号
O59 [应用物理学];
学科分类号
摘要
Several proposed space-based X-ray observatories apply TES-based micro-calorimeters as energy-dispersive imaging detector. The number of independently readout pixels is an important figure of merit for the scientific yield of such instruments. Design studies have shown that the power consumption of the SQUID readout is one of the driving design parameters which limits the maximum number of pixels which can be accommodated. Different multiplexing schemes, each with different properties and multiplexing factors have been proposed and demonstrated for the readout of the TES-based detectors. In an effort to estimate how the different readout multiplexing schemes differ in scalability for future space-based applications, we have made a comparison of the reported power consumption of the main multiplexing schemes currently under consideration for different space-based telescopes, i.e. time-domain multiplexing, frequency-domain multiplexing, and microwave SQUID multiplexing. It was found that, despite the different architectures and multiplexing factors, the power consumption per pixel at cryogenic temperatures is rather similar. We will analyze the origin of this phenomenon, and discuss directions of development to further improve on this number.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] ALPIDE for space applications: Power consumption
    Ricci, E.
    Di Ruzza, B.
    Iuppa, R.
    Serra, E.
    Manea, C.
    Rashevskaya, I
    NUOVO CIMENTO C-COLLOQUIA AND COMMUNICATIONS IN PHYSICS, 2019, 42 (04):
  • [22] Issues in Development of Space-Based Solar Power
    Jenkins, Lyle M.
    2009 IEEE AEROSPACE CONFERENCE, VOLS 1-7, 2009, : 114 - 120
  • [23] SPACE-BASED POWER-STATIONS - REPLY
    OWEN, CL
    FUTURIST, 1991, 25 (05) : 59 - 59
  • [24] Space-based range safety and future space range applications
    Whiteman, Donald E.
    Valencia, Lisa M.
    Simpson, James C.
    Proceedings of the First IAASS Conference on Space Safety, a New Beginning, 2005, 599 : 131 - 136
  • [25] SPACE-BASED POWER PLAN DEADLINE NEAR
    KLASS, PJ
    AVIATION WEEK & SPACE TECHNOLOGY, 1983, 119 (24): : 63 - &
  • [26] Projecting power: The security implications of space-based solar power
    Wood, Leet W.
    BULLETIN OF THE ATOMIC SCIENTISTS, 2012, 68 (01) : 70 - 78
  • [27] Photon-counting detectors for space-based applications
    Krainak, Michael A.
    Yang, Guangning
    Lu, Wei
    Sun, Xiaoli
    DETECTORS AND IMAGING DEVICES: INFRARED, FOCAL PLANE, SINGLE PHOTON, 2010, 7780
  • [28] UV Lifetime Laser Demonstrator for Space-Based Applications
    Albert, Michael
    Puffenburger, Kent
    Schum, Tom
    Fitzpatrick, Fran
    Litvinovitch, Slava
    Jones, Darrell
    Rudd, Joseph
    Hovis, Floyd
    LIDAR REMOTE SENSING FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING XV, 2015, 9612
  • [29] Development of Kill Assessment Technology for Space-Based Applications
    Erlandson, Robert E.
    Taylor, Jeff C.
    Michaelis, Christopher H.
    Edwards, Jennifer L.
    Brown, Robert C.
    Swaminathan, Pazhayannur K.
    Kumar, Cidambi K.
    Hargis, C. Bryon
    Goldberg, Arnold C.
    Klatt, Eric M.
    O'Marr, Greggory L.
    JOHNS HOPKINS APL TECHNICAL DIGEST, 2010, 29 (03): : 289 - 297
  • [30] Conductively-cooled lasers for space-based applications
    Hovis, FE
    Martin, N
    Burnham, R
    Spaceborne Sensors II, 2005, 5798 : 101 - 111