Multi-objective optimization of the magnetic wiping process in dip-coating

被引:0
|
作者
Pino, Fabio [1 ,2 ]
Scheid, Benoit [2 ]
Mendez, Miguel A. [1 ]
机构
[1] The von Karman Inst Fluid Dynam, EA Dept, Waterloosesteenweg 72, B-1640 Rhode St Genese, Belgium
[2] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Transfers Interfaces & Proc TIPs, Ave Franklin Roosevelt 50, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; Magnetic wiping; Pareto front; JET; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10665-025-10426-x
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Electromagnetic wiping systems allow to pre-meter the coating thickness of the liquid metal on a moving substrate. These systems have the potential to provide more uniform coating and significantly higher production rates compared to pneumatic wiping, but they require substantially larger amounts of energy. This work presents a multi-objective optimization accounting for (1) maximal wiping efficiency (2) maximal smoothness of the wiping meniscus, and (3) minimal Joule heating. We present the Pareto front, identifying the best wiping conditions given a set of weights for the three competing objectives. The optimization was based on a 1D steady-state integral model, whose prediction scales according to the Hartmann number (Ha). The optimization uses a multi-gradient approach, with gradients computed with a combination of finite differences and variational methods. The results show that the wiping efficiency depends solely on Ha and not on the magnetic field distribution. Moreover, we show that the liquid thickness becomes insensitive to the intensity of the magnetic field above a certain threshold and that the current distribution (hence the Joule heating) is mildly affected by the magnetic field's intensity and shape.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Analysis of single and multi-objective optimization of the pultrusion process
    Dias, Rita de Cassia Costa
    Santos, Lizandro de Sousa
    MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS, 2023, 35
  • [42] Study on Multi-objective Optimization of Oil Production Process
    Liu, Tan
    Gao, Xianwen
    Wang, Lina
    2014 11TH WORLD CONGRESS ON INTELLIGENT CONTROL AND AUTOMATION (WCICA), 2014, : 1824 - 1829
  • [43] Deep Gaussian process for multi-objective Bayesian optimization
    Ali Hebbal
    Mathieu Balesdent
    Loïc Brevault
    Nouredine Melab
    El-Ghazali Talbi
    Optimization and Engineering, 2023, 24 : 1809 - 1848
  • [44] Multi-objective optimization of nonlinear wastewater treatment process
    Xu, Gongxian
    Han, Xue
    Huagong Xuebao/CIESC Journal, 2013, 64 (10): : 3665 - 3672
  • [45] Multi-objective optimization of WEDM process by hybrid methodology
    Priyadarshini, Manisha
    Behera, Ajit
    Biswas, Chandan Kumar
    Swain, Biswajit
    Patel, Swadhin
    MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS, 2020, 33 : 5511 - 5513
  • [46] Multi-objective optimization of stamping forming process for TWB
    Zhou, Jie
    Luo, Yan
    Wang, Xun
    Dai, Hong
    Huazhong Keji Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 43 (02): : 45 - 49
  • [48] Multi-objective optimization for aluminum electrolysis production process
    Guo, Jun
    Gui, Wei-Hua
    Wen, Xin-Hai
    Zhongnan Daxue Xuebao (Ziran Kexue Ban)/Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2012, 43 (02): : 548 - 553
  • [49] Multi-objective optimization for resin transfer molding process
    Okabe, Tomonaga
    Oya, Yutaka
    Yamamoto, Go
    Sato, Junki
    Matsumiya, Tsubasa
    Matsuzaki, Ryosuke
    Yashiro, Shigeki
    Obayashi, Shigeru
    COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2017, 92 : 1 - 9
  • [50] Multi-objective optimization of the internal diamond burnishing process
    Duncheva, Galya, V
    Maximov, Jordan T.
    Anchev, Angel P.
    Dunchev, Vladimir P.
    Argirov, Yaroslav B.
    MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2022, 37 (04) : 428 - 436