Impact of 3D printing orientation on accuracy, properties, cost, and time efficiency of additively manufactured dental models: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Alghauli, Mohammed Ahmed [1 ]
Almuzaini, Sarah A. [2 ]
Aljohani, Rola [3 ]
Alqutaibi, Ahmed Yaseen [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] IBB Univ, Fac Dent, Prosthodont Dept, Ibb 70270, Yemen
[2] Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal Univ, Coll Dent, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
[3] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
[4] Taibah Univ, Coll Dent, Substitut Dent Sci Dept, Al Madinah, Saudi Arabia
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2024年 / 24卷 / 01期
关键词
Resin material; Dental models; Build-up angle; Printing direction; Accuracy; Surface quality; Printing speed; Energy saving; DIMENSIONAL ACCURACY; PLASTER;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-024-05365-5
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundThe evidence on the effect of printing orientation on dimensional accuracy and properties of resinous dental models is unclear. This systematic review aimed to assess the impact of printing orientation on the accuracy and properties of additively manufactured resinous dental models, besides the cost, material consumption, and time efficiency at different orientations.MethodsA comprehensive web search (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in July 2024 without language restrictions. The included studies were assessed using the modified consort statement for laboratory studies on dental materials. The outcomes were accuracy and surface quality, besides the cost and time efficiency of additively manufactured dental models printed in different directions.ResultsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, 14 records were included. Most records favored horizontally printed models with minor controversies regarding accuracy, material consumption, time, and cost efficiency. While orientation can influence surface quality, it is often more significantly affected by factors such as the printing technology used, the material properties, and the layer thickness.ConclusionsHorizontal orientation has proven to be the most efficient for producing dental models, particularly for single-model manufacturing, due to its superior time and cost savings. However, large-scale and overnight massive production favors the vertical orientation since the platform accommodates twice to triple the models' numbers as horizontal orientation. The majority of studies favor horizontal orientation for its accuracy.Choosing the optimal orientation in additive manufacturing not only ensures precision of dental models, improving the fit of restorations and prostheses, but also leads to significant reductions in production time, material usage, and energy consumption, ultimately minimizing environmental impact.ConclusionsHorizontal orientation has proven to be the most efficient for producing dental models, particularly for single-model manufacturing, due to its superior time and cost savings. However, large-scale and overnight massive production favors the vertical orientation since the platform accommodates twice to triple the models' numbers as horizontal orientation. The majority of studies favor horizontal orientation for its accuracy.Choosing the optimal orientation in additive manufacturing not only ensures precision of dental models, improving the fit of restorations and prostheses, but also leads to significant reductions in production time, material usage, and energy consumption, ultimately minimizing environmental impact.Trial registrationNot applicable.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparison of additive manufactured models of the mandible in accuracy and quality using six different 3D printing systems
    Gottsauner, Maximilian
    Reichert, Torsten
    Koerdt, Steffen
    Wieser, Stefan
    Klingelhoeffer, Christoph
    Kirschneck, Christian
    Hoffmann, Juergen
    Ettl, Tobias
    Ristow, Oliver
    JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 49 (09) : 855 - 866
  • [22] Accuracy of soy-based resins for dental 3D printing
    Pauls, Alexander
    Hornberg, Antonia
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2024, 94 (05) : 574 - 580
  • [23] Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review
    Yanhao Hou
    Weiguang Wang
    Paulo Bartolo
    Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2022, (03) : 556 - 579
  • [24] Low-Cost Cranioplasty-A Systematic Review of 3D Printing in Medicine
    Czyzewski, Wojciech
    Jachimczyk, Jakub
    Hoffman, Zofia
    Szymoniuk, Michal
    Litak, Jakub
    Maciejewski, Marcin
    Kura, Krzysztof
    Rola, Radoslaw
    Torres, Kamil
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (14)
  • [25] Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review
    Yanhao Hou
    Weiguang Wang
    Paulo Bartolo
    Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2022, 5 (03) : 556 - 579
  • [26] Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review
    Yanhao Hou
    Weiguang Wang
    Paulo Bartolo
    Bio-Design and Manufacturing, 2022, 5 : 556 - 579
  • [27] Application of additively manufactured 3D scaffolds for bone cancer treatment: a review
    Hou, Yanhao
    Wang, Weiguang
    Bartolo, Paulo
    BIO-DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING, 2022, 5 (03) : 556 - 579
  • [28] Effect of printing orientation on the fracture strength of additively manufactured 3-unit interim fixed dental prostheses after aging
    Turksayar, Almira Ada Diken
    Donmez, Mustafa Borga
    Olcay, Emin Orkun
    Demirel, Munir
    Demir, Esra
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2022, 124
  • [29] 3D Printing in Liver Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Witowski, Jan Sylwester
    Coles-Black, Jasamine
    Zuzak, Tomasz Zbigniew
    Pedziwiatr, Michal
    Chuen, Jason
    Major, Piotr
    Budzynski, Andrzej
    TELEMEDICINE AND E-HEALTH, 2017, 23 (12) : 943 - 947
  • [30] 3D printing in palliative medicine: systematic review
    Kermavnar, Tjasa
    Guttridge, Callum
    Mulcahy, Niall J.
    Duffy, Ed
    Twomey, Feargal
    O'Sullivan, Leonard
    BMJ SUPPORTIVE & PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 14 (E3) : E2244 - E2253