A real-time solar flare forecasting system with deep learning methods

被引:0
|
作者
Yan, Pengchao [1 ]
Li, Xuebao [1 ]
Zheng, Yanfang [1 ]
Dong, Liang [2 ,5 ]
Yan, Shuainan [3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Shunhuang [1 ]
Ye, Hongwei [1 ]
Li, Xuefeng [1 ]
Lue, Yongshang [1 ]
Ling, Yi [1 ]
Huang, Xusheng [1 ]
Pan, Yexin [6 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Comp, Zhenjiang 212100, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Yunnan Astron Observ, Kunming 650216, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Natl Space Sci Ctr, Beijing 100190, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[5] Yunnan Sino Malaysian Int Joint Lab HF VHF Adv Rad, Kunming 650216, Peoples R China
[6] MailBox 5111, Beijing 100094, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
The sun (1693); Solar flares (1496); Astronomy image processing (2306); Convolutional neural networks (1938); SPACE WEATHER; MODELS;
D O I
10.1007/s10509-024-04374-8
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
In this study, we develop five deep learning models, a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model, a CNN model with Squeeze-and-Excitation Attention(CNN-SE), a CNN model with Convolutional Block Attention Module (CNN-CBAM), a CNN model with Efficient Channel Attention (CNN-ECA), and a Vision Transformer (ViT) model, for predicting whether >= C or >= M-class solar flares occurring within 24 hours. We build a real-time forecasting system using these five models, which can achieve classification and probability forecasting. The 10-fold cross-validation sets are generated in chronological order using the full-disk magnetograms provided by the Solar Dynamics Observatory/Helioseismic and Magnetic Imager at 00:00 UT from May 1, 2010, to March 31, 2023. Then after training, validation, and testing our models, we compare the results with the true skill statistic (TSS) and Brier Skill Score (BSS) as assessment metrics. The major results are as follows: (1) There are no statistically significant differences in TSS and BSS performance between models with attention mechanisms and the CNN model. (2) For >= C-class flare prediction, the Recall of the ViT model reaches 0.833, significantly better than that of the CNN model. For >= M-class flare prediction, the Recall of the CNN-ECA and ViT models are 0.799 and 0.855, respectively, which are significantly higher than those of the CNN model. (3) We develop a full-disk solar flare prediction system that has been running since May 1, 2023. By December 31, all five models achieve a TSS of 0.984 for predicting >= C-class flares, with the CNN-SE model demonstrating a BSS of 0.939. For >= M-class flares, the CNN-SE model achieves a TSS of 0.304, while the BSS values for the CNN and CNN-SE models are 0.019 and 0.018, respectively. Additionally, the prediction performance for >= M-class flares on the testing set without No-flare class samples, is similar to that of real-time predictions, validating the good generation performance of the model in real-time forecasting.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] EVALUATING THE PERFORMANCE OF SOLAR FLARE FORECASTING METHODS
    Barnes, G.
    Leka, K. D.
    ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL LETTERS, 2008, 688 (02) : L107 - L110
  • [22] Deep Landscape Forecasting for Real-time Bidding Advertising
    Ren, Kan
    Qin, Jiarui
    Zheng, Lei
    Yang, Zhengyu
    Zhang, Weinan
    Yu, Yong
    KDD'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 25TH ACM SIGKDD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCCE ON KNOWLEDGE DISCOVERY AND DATA MINING, 2019, : 363 - 372
  • [23] Deep Learning Model for Real-Time Flood Forecasting in Fast-Flowing Watershed
    Wang, Fan
    Mu, Jie
    Zhang, Cheng
    Wang, Weiqi
    Bi, Wuxia
    Lin, Wenqing
    Zhang, Dawei
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2025, 18 (01):
  • [24] Utilizing deep learning for near real-time rainfall forecasting based on Radar data
    Kumar, Bipin
    Haral, Hrishikesh
    Kalapureddy, M. C. R.
    Singh, Bhupendra Bahadur
    Yadav, Sanjay
    Chattopadhyay, Rajib
    Pattanaik, D. R.
    Rao, Suryachandra A.
    Mohapatra, Mrutyunjay
    PHYSICS AND CHEMISTRY OF THE EARTH, 2024, 135
  • [25] A Deep Learning Based Real-time Load Forecasting Method in Electricity Spot Market
    Zhang, Qipei
    Lu, Jixiang
    Yang, Zhihong
    Tu, Mengfu
    2018 INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGY (SCSET 2018), 2019, 1176
  • [26] A real-time operational inflow forecasting system
    Mathier, L
    Bouchard, K
    Bisson, JL
    WATER RESOURCES ENGINEERING 98, VOLS 1 AND 2, 1998, : 1014 - 1019
  • [27] Real-time traffic forecasting with recent DTA methods
    Kucharski, Rafal
    Kostic, Bojan
    Gentile, Guido
    2017 5TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MODELS AND TECHNOLOGIES FOR INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS (MT-ITS), 2017, : 474 - 479
  • [28] Assessment of Different Deep Learning Methods of Power Generation Forecasting for Solar PV System
    Kuo, Wen-Chi
    Chen, Chiun-Hsun
    Hua, Shih-Hong
    Wang, Chi-Chuan
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2022, 12 (15):
  • [29] A Real-Time Recognition System for User Characteristics Based on Deep Learning
    Nunez Fernandez, Dennis
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2018 IEEE 25TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONICS, ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING AND COMPUTING (INTERCON 2018), 2018,
  • [30] Real-Time Facemask Recognition with Alarm System using Deep Learning
    Militante, Sammy, V
    Dionisio, Nanette, V
    2020 11TH IEEE CONTROL AND SYSTEM GRADUATE RESEARCH COLLOQUIUM (ICSGRC), 2020, : 106 - 110