When things go wrong: the recall of AI systems as a last resort for ethical and lawful AI

被引:0
|
作者
Alessio Tartaro [1 ]
机构
[1] University of Sassari,Department of Humanities and Social Sciences
来源
AI and Ethics | 2025年 / 5卷 / 1期
关键词
AI recall; AI regulation; AI Act; AI ethics; AI principles; AI governance;
D O I
10.1007/s43681-023-00327-z
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents an initial exploration of the concept of AI system recall, primarily understood as a last resort when AI systems violate ethical norms, societal expectations, or legal obligations. The discussion is spurred by recent incidents involving notable AI systems, demonstrating that AI recalls can be a very real necessity. This study delves into the concept of product recall as traditionally understood in industry and explores its potential application to AI systems. Our analysis of this concept is centered around two prominent categories of recall drivers in the AI domain: ethical-social and legal considerations. In terms of ethical-social drivers, we apply the innovative notion of “moral Operational Design Domain”, suggesting AI systems should be recalled when they violate ethical principles and societal expectation. In addition, we also explore the recall of AI systems from a legal perspective, where the recently proposed AI Act provides regulatory measures for recalling AI systems that pose risks to health, safety, and fundamental rights. The paper also underscores the need for further research, especially around defining precise ethical and societal triggers for AI recalls, creating an efficient recall management framework for organizations, and reassessing the fit of traditional product recall models for AI systems within the AI Act's regulatory context. By probing these complex intersections between AI, ethics, and regulation, this work aims to contribute to the development of robust and responsible AI systems while maintaining readiness for failure scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:253 / 262
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Vitrectomy: when things go wrong
    Nagpal, Manish
    Wartikar, Sharang
    EXPERT REVIEW OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 2 (04) : 645 - 660
  • [22] What Happens When AI Is Wrong?
    Baird, Grayson L.
    Bernstein, Michael H.
    Atalay, Michael K.
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 309 (01)
  • [23] Why Does AI Companionship Go Wrong?
    Gao, Ziwei
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF INFORMATION ETHICS, 2024, 34
  • [24] Self-driving cars and AI-assisted endoscopy: Who should take the responsibility when things go wrong?
    Poon, Nicholas C. H.
    Sung, Joseph J. Y.
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2019, 34 (04) : 625 - 626
  • [25] When Things Go Wrong: A Guide to the Medical, Ethical, and Legal Dimensions of Surgical Complications
    Garcia, Jose Rafael
    Allende, Felicitas
    Kogan, Monica
    Chahla, Jorge
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS GLOBAL RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2024, 8 (12):
  • [26] When things go wrong ... Incident reporting
    Elston, Harry
    Langerman, Neal
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 251
  • [27] When things go wrong at the compost site
    Williams, P
    BIOCYCLE, 1996, 37 (04) : 94 - &
  • [28] Therapeutic apheresis: When things go wrong
    Torloni, A. Sergio
    Lumadue, Jeanne
    Zubair, Abba
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2012, 27 (03) : 168 - 171
  • [29] WHEN THINGS GO WRONG, HEADS ROLL
    COX, R
    IEEE SOFTWARE, 1993, 10 (01) : 8 - 8
  • [30] Getting It Right When Things Go Wrong
    Pettker, Christian M.
    Funai, Edmund F.
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2010, 303 (10): : 977 - 978