Evaluating students' learning achievements using the formative assessment technique: a retrospective study

被引:0
|
作者
Sirianansopa, Kantisa [1 ]
机构
[1] Prince Songkla Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat, Div Pulm Med, Hat Yai, Thailand
关键词
Formative assessments; Summative assessments; Normalised gain method; Undergraduate medical education; Learning achievement; EDUCATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12909-024-06347-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background: Formative assessment promotes positive learning outcomes and evaluates students over time. We aimed to evaluate students' learning achievements after implementing a formative assessment technique by using a normalised gain method. Methods: This retrospective observational study was conducted at the School of Medicine and Health Science, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Thailand. There were 118 fifth-year medical students who attended a general pediatric course in the 2021-2022 academic year. Results: In the summative assessment, the post-test scores were significantly greater than the pretest scores (mean difference 20.53, 95% CI (18.63-22.44), P < 0.001). The median value of the overall student learning gain (g) was 0.34 (0.23, 0.45). Students with medium gains had significantly higher scores than those with low gains (P < 0.001). Students' learning gains had a positive correlation with post-test scores. (R = 0.6, P = 0.01). Conclusions: The formative assessment technique is a valuable method for enhancing students' learning outcomes by offering timely and effective feedback through mentoring systems. It is essential to integrate formative assessments into standard assessment strategies in undergraduate medical education.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Students' assessment preferences and approaches to learning: can formative assessment make a difference?
    Gijbels, David
    Dochy, Filip
    EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2006, 32 (04) : 399 - 409
  • [22] Formative Evaluation and Learning of the Technique of the Auction of Soccer of the Students of the University Level
    Suarez Sotelo, Julio Cesar
    Damian Nunez, Edgar Froilan
    Alarcon Diaz, Mitchell Alberto
    Isla Alcoser, Sandy Dorian
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EARLY CHILDHOOD SPECIAL EDUCATION, 2021, 13 (02) : 619 - 623
  • [23] Combining Flipped Learning and Formative Assessment to Enhance the Learning Performance of Students in Programming
    Cheng, Shu-Chen
    Cheng, Yu-Ping
    Huang, Yueh-Min
    Yang, Yeongwook
    INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGIES AND LEARNING, 2021, 13117 : 498 - 507
  • [24] Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students' self-regulation in English language learning
    Xiao, Yangyu
    Yang, Min
    SYSTEM, 2019, 81 : 39 - 49
  • [25] Evaluating Students' Programs Using Automated Assessment - A Case Study
    English, John
    Rosenthal, Tammy
    ITICSE 2009: PROCEEDING OF THE 2009 ACM SIGSE ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON INNOVATION AND TECHNOLOGY IN COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2009, : 371 - 371
  • [26] A Systematic Review of Formative Assessment to Support Students Learning Computer Programming
    Thangaraj, Jagadeeswaran
    Ward, Monica
    O’Riordan, Fiona
    OpenAccess Series in Informatics, 2023, 112
  • [27] Influence of Formative Assessment upon Cultivating Students' English Learning Interest
    Wu, Dingxiang
    2013 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND EDUCATION (ICSSE 2013), PT 1, 2013, 46 : 33 - 36
  • [28] Focus on Formative Assessment to Cultivate Students' English Autonomous Learning Ability
    Liu, Yafang
    2016 3RD INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, BUSINESS MANAGEMENT AND EDUCATIONAL INNOVATION (EBMEI 2016), PT 2, 2016, 55 : 620 - 623
  • [29] On Cultivating Students' English Learning Interest Based Upon Formative Assessment
    Wu, Ding-xiang
    Mei, Peng-lin
    INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL SCIENCE AND DEVELOPMENT (ICSSD 2015), 2015, : 86 - 89
  • [30] Research for Formative Assessment to Promote Learning Initiative of Less Advanced Students
    Hu, Xuanyan
    Hu, Jianping
    Xie, Wei
    2011 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ECONOMIC, EDUCATION AND MANAGEMENT (ICEEM2011), VOL II, 2011, : 314 - 317