Endonasal surgery high-risk carotid injury timeout checklist: implementation, institutional protocol and experience

被引:0
|
作者
Barkhoudarian, Garni [1 ,2 ]
Pahlevani, Mehrdad [1 ,2 ]
Ratnam, Seshaan [1 ]
Mallari, Regin Jay [1 ]
Griffiths, Chester [1 ,2 ]
Kelly, Daniel F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Neurosci Inst, Providence St Johns Hlth Ctr, 2125 Arizona Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
[2] St Johns Canc Inst, Providence St Johns Hlth Ctr, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
关键词
Brain tumor; Carotid injury; Carotid time-out; Endoscopic endonasal surgery; Parasellar; Pituitary tumor; Transsphenoidal surgery; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-024-06340-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Carotid artery injury is a rare, but major complication of endonasal operations. The morbidity and mortality of such a complication can be mitigated by preparedness and a clear plan set in place to address the hemorrhage expeditiously. This study examines the implementation of such a carotid injury timeout checklist and demonstrates its effectiveness in a patient with possible arterial injury. Methods A carotid injury timeout checklist was implemented for high risk endonasal procedures. The case selection was left to the surgeon, with guidelines including prior surgery, prior radiation, invasive tumors, and certain pathologies such as meningioma or chordoma. Factors affecting implementation were analyzed including tumor characteristics and patient history. Results Over a 12-month period, 103 endonasal operations were performed since the carotid artery injury timeout checklist was implemented, with 21 (20.4%) having a carotid artery injury timeout performed. Tumor characteristics that were associated with performing this timeout included Knosp grade (for pituitary adenomas, p = 0.002), carotid artery encasement (p < 0.001), extended approach (p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.05) and diagnosis (p < 0.001). Re-operation and prior radiation were not factors for this cohort. The single carotid artery branch (hypertrophic vidian artery) injury that was sustained was easily and successfully managed, aided by preparation established via this protocol. The additional time necessary for this timeout to be performed was negligible with respect to the overall surgery length. Conclusion A carotid artery injury timeout can and should be successfully implemented for extended endonasal operations for pituitary and parasellar tumors with high risk factors including, but not limited to, carotid injury encasement, large tumor size and non-adenomatous diagnoses. A comprehensive plan for both intraoperative and perioperative management of the carotid injury is necessary to minimize the risk of morbidity and to deliver care expeditiously.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Protocol Practice in Perioperative Management of High-Risk Patients Undergoing Complex Spine Surgery
    Patrick A. Sugrue
    Jamal McClendon
    Ryan J. Halpin
    Tyler R. Koski
    Spine Deformity, 2012, 1 (Suppl 1) : 15 - 22
  • [32] Clinical and Imaging Characterization of Pathogenic High-risk Pancreatic Cancer Variants: Development of an Institutional Screening Protocol
    Choi, A. H.
    Roman, M.
    Morano, W. F.
    Selleck, M. J.
    Lum, S.
    Gomez, N.
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 1) : S100 - S101
  • [33] Association of Year of Surgery and Carotid Stenting Outcomes in High-risk Patients, 2015-2021
    Stonko, David P.
    Bose, Sanuja
    McDermott, Katherine
    Keegan, Alana
    Morrison, Jonathan J.
    Hicks, Caitlin W.
    JAMA SURGERY, 2023, 158 (07) : 768 - 769
  • [34] Uric Acid: A Novel Risk Factor for Acute Kidney Injury in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients?
    Ejaz, A. Ahsan
    Beaver, Thomas M.
    Shimada, Michiko
    Sood, Puneet
    Lingegowda, Vijaykumar
    Schold, Jesse D.
    Kim, Tad
    Johnson, Richard J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEPHROLOGY, 2009, 30 (05) : 425 - 429
  • [35] Acute kidney injury in high-risk cardiac surgery patients: roles of inflammation and coagulation
    Scrascia, Giuseppe
    Rotunno, Crescenzia
    Simone, Simona
    Montemurno, Eustacchio
    Amorese, Lilla
    De Palo, Micaela
    Castellano, Giuseppe
    Pertosa, Giovanni B.
    Gesualdo, Loreto
    Paparella, Domenico
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2017, 18 (05) : 359 - 365
  • [36] Postoperative acute kidney injury in high-risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
    Romagnoli, Stefano
    Zagli, Giovanni
    Tuccinardi, Germana
    Tofani, Lorenzo
    Chelazzi, Cosimo
    Villa, Gianluca
    Cianchi, Fabio
    Coratti, Andrea
    De Gaudio, Angelo Raffaele
    Ricci, Zaccaria
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2016, 35 : 120 - 125
  • [37] Prediction of perioperative myocardial infarction/injury in high-risk patients after noncardiac surgery
    Meister, Rebecca
    Puelacher, Christian
    Glarner, Noemi
    Gualandro, Danielle Menosi
    Andersson, Henrik A.
    Pargger, Mirjam
    Hure, Gabrielle
    Virant, Georgiana
    Bolliger, Daniel
    Lampart, Andreas
    Steiner, Luzius
    Hidvegi, Reka
    Buse, Giovanna Lurati
    Kindler, Christoph
    Gurke, Lorenz
    Mujagic, Edin
    Schaeren, Stefan
    Clauss, Martin
    Lardinois, Didier
    Hammerer-Lercher, Angelika
    Chew, Michelle
    Mueller, Christian
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE, 2023, 12 (11) : 729 - 739
  • [38] Heart valve surgery in a very high-risk population: A preliminary experience in awake patients
    Bottio, Tomaso
    Bisleri, Gianluigi
    Piccoli, Paolo
    Negri, Alberto
    Manzato, Aldo
    Muneretto, Claudio
    JOURNAL OF HEART VALVE DISEASE, 2007, 16 (02): : 187 - 194
  • [39] Feasibility and Safety of Bariatric Surgery in High-Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience
    Moulla, Yusef
    Lyros, Orestis
    Blueher, Matthias
    Simon, Philipp
    Dietrich, Arne
    JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2018, 2018
  • [40] Checklist design and implementation: critical considerations to improve patient safety for low-frequency, high-risk patient events
    Turkelson, Carman
    Keiser, Megan
    Sculli, Gary
    Capoccia, Diane
    BMJ SIMULATION & TECHNOLOGY ENHANCED LEARNING, 2020, 6 (03): : 148 - 157