Endonasal surgery high-risk carotid injury timeout checklist: implementation, institutional protocol and experience

被引:0
|
作者
Barkhoudarian, Garni [1 ,2 ]
Pahlevani, Mehrdad [1 ,2 ]
Ratnam, Seshaan [1 ]
Mallari, Regin Jay [1 ]
Griffiths, Chester [1 ,2 ]
Kelly, Daniel F. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Neurosci Inst, Providence St Johns Hlth Ctr, 2125 Arizona Ave, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
[2] St Johns Canc Inst, Providence St Johns Hlth Ctr, Santa Monica, CA 90404 USA
关键词
Brain tumor; Carotid injury; Carotid time-out; Endoscopic endonasal surgery; Parasellar; Pituitary tumor; Transsphenoidal surgery; ARTERY;
D O I
10.1007/s00701-024-06340-3
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective Carotid artery injury is a rare, but major complication of endonasal operations. The morbidity and mortality of such a complication can be mitigated by preparedness and a clear plan set in place to address the hemorrhage expeditiously. This study examines the implementation of such a carotid injury timeout checklist and demonstrates its effectiveness in a patient with possible arterial injury. Methods A carotid injury timeout checklist was implemented for high risk endonasal procedures. The case selection was left to the surgeon, with guidelines including prior surgery, prior radiation, invasive tumors, and certain pathologies such as meningioma or chordoma. Factors affecting implementation were analyzed including tumor characteristics and patient history. Results Over a 12-month period, 103 endonasal operations were performed since the carotid artery injury timeout checklist was implemented, with 21 (20.4%) having a carotid artery injury timeout performed. Tumor characteristics that were associated with performing this timeout included Knosp grade (for pituitary adenomas, p = 0.002), carotid artery encasement (p < 0.001), extended approach (p < 0.001), tumor size (p = 0.05) and diagnosis (p < 0.001). Re-operation and prior radiation were not factors for this cohort. The single carotid artery branch (hypertrophic vidian artery) injury that was sustained was easily and successfully managed, aided by preparation established via this protocol. The additional time necessary for this timeout to be performed was negligible with respect to the overall surgery length. Conclusion A carotid artery injury timeout can and should be successfully implemented for extended endonasal operations for pituitary and parasellar tumors with high risk factors including, but not limited to, carotid injury encasement, large tumor size and non-adenomatous diagnoses. A comprehensive plan for both intraoperative and perioperative management of the carotid injury is necessary to minimize the risk of morbidity and to deliver care expeditiously.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-risk carotid endarterectomy and high-risk carotid surgery: is surgery or stenting the best choice?
    Loftus, CM
    DEVELOPMENTS IN NEUROSCIENCE, PROCEEDINGS, 2002, 1247 : 319 - 326
  • [2] Carotid Artery Surgery: High-Risk Patients or High-Risk Centers?
    Bouziane, Zakariyae
    Nourissat, Ghislain
    Duprey, Ambroise
    Albertini, Jean Noel
    Favre, Jean Pierre
    Barral, Xavier
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2012, 26 (06) : 790 - 796
  • [3] Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management
    Sharma Rahul K.
    Irace Alexandria L.
    Overdevest Jonathan B.
    Gudis David A.
    世界耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志英文版, 2022, (01) : 54 - 60
  • [4] Carotid artery injury in endoscopic endonasal surgery: Risk factors, prevention, and management
    Sharma, Rahul K.
    Irace, Alexandria L.
    Overdevest, Jonathan B.
    Gudis, David A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2022, 8 (01): : 54 - 60
  • [5] URGENT CAROTID SURGERY FOR HIGH-RISK PATIENTS
    GREENHALGH, RM
    CUMING, R
    PERKIN, GD
    MCCOLLUM, CN
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1993, 7 : 25 - 32
  • [6] Internal carotid artery injury during endonasal sinus surgery: our experience and review of the literature
    Lum, S. G.
    Gendeh, B. S.
    Husain, S.
    Gendeh, H. S.
    Ismail, M. R.
    Toh, C. J.
    Izaham, A.
    Tan, H. J.
    ACTA OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGICA ITALICA, 2019, 39 (02) : 130 - 136
  • [7] Standardizing Care for High-Risk Patients in Spine Surgery The Northwestern High-Risk Spine Protocol
    Halpin, Ryan J.
    Sugrue, Patrick A.
    Gould, Robert W.
    Kallas, Peter G.
    Schafer, Michael F.
    Ondra, Stephen L.
    Koski, Tyler R.
    SPINE, 2010, 35 (25) : 2232 - 2238
  • [8] Anatomic criteria determining high-risk carotid surgery patients
    Tsantilas, Pavlos
    Kuehnl, Andreas
    Brener, Erich
    Eckstein, Hans-Henning
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 58 (02): : 152 - 160
  • [9] Acute kidney injury surveillance in the high-risk neonatal population following implementation of creatinine screening protocol
    Gingrich, Alyssa R.
    Hagenow, Allison M.
    Steinbach, Emily J.
    Klein, Jonathan M.
    Jetton, Jennifer G.
    Misurac, Jason M.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2024, 113 (04) : 692 - 699
  • [10] Internal carotid artery injury during endoscopic endonasal surgery for skull base pathologies: an institutional incidence, management, and outcome
    Iranmehr, Arad
    Sarpoolaki, Mohammad Kazem
    Sadrehosseini, Seyed Mousa
    Tabari, Azin
    Zeinalizadeh, Mehdi
    ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 93 (7-8) : 1964 - 1969