Comparison of clinical outcomes between hamstring tendon autografts and hybrid grafts in ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Fan, Lei [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Tang, Jiexi [1 ]
Xu, Zhe [1 ]
Fu, Weili [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Orthoped Res Inst, Dept Orthoped, Chengdu, Peoples R China
来源
关键词
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Hamstring tendon; Hybrid graft; Autograft; Meta-analysis; ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT; DOSE GAMMA-IRRADIATION; PATELLAR TENDON; ALLOGRAFT AUGMENTATION; BONE GRAFT; DIAMETER; SIZE; FAILURE; REVISION; RISK;
D O I
10.1186/s13018-024-05310-w
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundHamstring tendon (HT) autografts have become a popular choice for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. However, small-diameter grafts are inevitably encountered during surgery, which have poor biomechanical properties. Hybrid grafts (HGs) using an allograft combined with small diameter HT are gaining interest from surgeons.HypothesisThere would be no difference between the HT autograft and HG in terms of failure, knee stability, and patient-reported outcomes.Study designSystematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, web of science and Cochrane databases were systematically searched from their inception until July 1, 2022. Clinical trials that compared HG and HT autografts were included. The quality of the included studies was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool and the modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Extracted data were pooled with fixed or random effects depending on the detected heterogeneity.ResultsA total of 14 eligible studies involving 1411 patients (HT: 863; HG: 548) were included in the quantitative meta-analysis. The mean age of the patients involved ranged from 14.6 to 40.4 years. Compared to patients who received HT autografts, patients receiving HGs had similar postoperative failure rate (OR, 0.99; P = 0.97; I2 = 41%), side-to-side difference (MD, -0.16; P = 0.13; I2 = 41%), Subjective IKDC (MD, 0.51; P = 0.58; I2 = 69%), Lysholm (MD, 2.79; P = 0.1; I2 = 79%), Tegner (MD, -0.88; P = 0.56; I2 = 0%). When the available data for failure rate were analyzed by the dose of irradiation, patient age, and mean diameter of the HT, the results of subgroup analyses did not change substantially.ConclusionThis review found no significant differences in failure rates, knee stability, or patient-reported outcomes between autologous HT and HG in ACLR. Surgeons should prioritize autografts of adequate size through optimized techniques and consider hybrid grafts as a last resort, considering the risks associated with allografts.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Comparative effectiveness of peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autografts versus hamstring tendon (HT) autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive systematic review and meta analysis
    Park, Jae Yong
    Fernandes, Andre
    Park, Shin Young
    Lim, Hayeon
    Sayudo, Iqbal Farhan
    Leibovitch, Liron
    Machinski, Elcio
    Ha, Joon
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND TRAUMATOLOGY, 2024, 34 (05): : 2691 - 2699
  • [22] Peroneus Longus vs Hamstring Tendon Autografts in ACL Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of 106 Patients' Outcomes
    Gok, Bilal
    Kanar, Muharrem
    Tutak, Yilmaz
    MEDICAL SCIENCE MONITOR, 2024, 30
  • [23] Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lucas Beckers
    Thiago Vivacqua
    Andrew D. Firth
    Alan M. J. Getgood
    Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 8
  • [24] Clinical Outcomes After ACL Reconstruction in Soccer (Football, Futbol) Players: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Hong, Ian S.
    Pierpoint, Lauren A.
    Hellwinkel, Justin E.
    Berk, Alexander N.
    Salandra, Jonathan M.
    Meade, Joshua D.
    Piasecki, Dana P.
    Fleischli, James E.
    Ahmad, Christopher S.
    Trofa, David P.
    Saltzman, Bryan M.
    SPORTS HEALTH-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY APPROACH, 2023, 15 (06): : 788 - 804
  • [25] Clinical outcomes of contemporary lateral augmentation techniques in primary ACL reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Beckers, Lucas
    Vivacqua, Thiago
    Firth, Andrew D.
    Getgood, Alan M. J.
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2021, 8 (01)
  • [26] Relationship between hamstring strength and hop performance at 8 and 12 months after ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendon autografts
    Hogberg, Johan
    Lindskog, Jakob
    Sundberg, Axel
    Piussi, Ramana
    Simonsson, Rebecca
    Samuelsson, Kristian
    Thomee, Roland
    Hamrin Senorski, Eric
    BMC SPORTS SCIENCE MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 16 (01):
  • [27] Hamstring versus quadriceps tendon grafts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A meta-analysis
    Tian, Shengyu
    Fang, Xuewei
    Ren, Shujun
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2025, 48 (03) : 1716 - 1717
  • [28] Outcome of Patellar Tendon Versus 4-Strand Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Randomized Trials
    Chee, Michael Y. K.
    Chen, Yongsheng
    Pearce, Christopher Jon
    Murphy, Diarmuid P.
    Krishna, Lingaraj
    Hui, James H. P.
    Wang, Wilson E. J.
    Tai, Bee Choo
    Salunke, Abhijeet A.
    Chen, Xi
    Chua, Zackary K. H.
    Satkunanantham, Kandiah
    ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (02): : 450 - 463
  • [29] Double-Layered Quadriceps Tendon Autografts Provide Lower Failure Rates and Improved Clinical Results Compared With Hamstring Tendon Grafts in Revision ACL Reconstruction
    Eggeling, Lena
    Breer, Stefan
    Drenck, Tobias Claus
    Frosch, Karl-Heinz
    Akoto, Ralph
    ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (12)
  • [30] Outcomes following surgical management of proximal hamstring tendon avulsions A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Hillier-Smith, R.
    Paton, B.
    BONE & JOINT OPEN, 2022, 3 (05): : 415 - 422