Outcomes of intramedullary nailing versus plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Derbas, Jawad [1 ]
Moghamis, Isam [1 ]
Alzobi, Osama [1 ]
Elshoeibi, Amgad [2 ]
Murshid, Abdullah [1 ]
Ahmed, Ghalib [1 ]
机构
[1] Hamad Gen Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Doha, Qatar
[2] Qatar Univ, Coll Med, QU Hlth, Doha, Qatar
关键词
Humerus shaft; Fracture; DCP; IMN; Functional outcome; NONOPERATIVE TREATMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00590-025-04181-z
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Humeral shaft fractures account for 1-3% of all bone fractures. Conservative treatment often leads to complications such as non-union and shoulder stiffness. Surgical fixation with a dynamic compression plate (DCP) has been the gold standard treatment. Intramedullary nailing (IMN) has recently gained popularity due to its minimally invasive approach and reduced risk of radial nerve injury. This study aims to compare the outcomes of IMN and plate fixation for humeral shaft fractures. Methods This retrospective study included patients with humeral shaft fractures treated with either IMN or DCP fixation at Hamad General Hospital between April 2015 and October 2018. Patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical outcomes, and complications were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient information, and univariate analysis was conducted to compare both groups. A Cox proportional hazards model, adjusted for age, gender, and polytrauma status was applied to compare time to union between IMN and DCP groups. Results Sixty five patients (25 IMN, 40 plate fixation) were included. Non-union rates were higher in the DCP group than in the IMN group (13% vs. 4%). Reoperation rates were also higher in the DCP group (20% vs. 4%). Postoperative neuropathy rates were 4% for IMN and 10% for DCP, with neuropathy resolution significantly higher in the IMN group (92% vs. 68%). Shoulder range of motion (ROM) and pain favored the DCP group, with 98% unaffected ROM in the plate group compared to 76% in the IMN group (p = 0.007), and a lower incidence of shoulder pain (28% vs. 98%, p < 0.001). Time to union was comparable between both groups, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.08 (95% CI 0.62-1.90; p = 0.776). Conclusion IMN and plate fixation effectively achieved fracture union; however, plate fixation was associated with better shoulder function, reduced pain, and higher reoperation rates. IMN was linked to a lower risk of nerve injury but compromised shoulder ROM and resulted in more postoperative pain.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Functional and Clinical Outcomes After Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Intramedullary Nailing of a Humeral Shaft Fracture The Results of the HUMMER Multicenter, Prospective Cohort Study
    Den Hartog, Dennis
    Mahabier, Kiran C.
    Van Bergen, Saskia H.
    Verhofstad, Michael H. J.
    Van Lieshout, Esther M. M.
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2023, 105 (14): : 1101 - 1111
  • [32] Intramedullary Nailing Versus Compound Plate Osteosynthesis in Pathologic Diaphyseal Humerus Fractures A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Koob, Sebastian
    Ploeger, Milena M.
    Bornemann, Rahel
    Lehmann, Ramona P.
    Alex, Dana
    Placzek, Richard
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2022, 45 (09): : 379 - 380
  • [33] Fixation of humeral head fractures with antegrade intramedullary nailing
    Stedtfeld, HM
    Attmanspacher, W
    Thaler, K
    Frosch, B
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2003, 128 (01): : 6 - 11
  • [34] Plate versus intramedullary nail fixation in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures: an updated meta-analysis
    Ouyang, Hanbin
    Xiong, Jun
    Xiang, Peng
    Cui, Zhuang
    Chen, Liguang
    Yu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2013, 22 (03) : 387 - 395
  • [35] Elastic Stable Intramedullary Nailing for Pediatric Humeral Shaft Fractures Under Ultrasonographic Guidance: A Retrospective Study
    Li, Jun
    Wu, Jun
    Zhang, Yuan
    Gou, Pan
    Li, Xiang
    Shi, Mingyan
    Zhang, Man
    Wang, Peikang
    Liu, Xing
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 9
  • [36] Is distal locking screw necessary for intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures? A comparative cohort study
    Colombi, Romain
    Chauvet, Thomas
    Labattut, Ludovic
    Viard, Brice
    Baulot, Emmanuel
    Martz, Pierre
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2019, 43 (09) : 2151 - 2160
  • [37] Intramedullary nailing versus a locking compression plate for humeral shaft fracture (AO/OTA 12-A and B): A retrospective study
    Zhang, Ruipeng
    Yin, Yingchao
    Li, Shilun
    Hou, Zhiyong
    Jin, Lin
    Zhang, Yingze
    ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2020, 106 (07) : 1391 - 1397
  • [38] Dynamic compression plating versus locked intramedullary nailing for humeral shaft fractures in adults
    Kurup, Harish
    Hossain, Munier
    Andrew, J. Glynne
    COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2011, (06):
  • [39] Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures - a meta-analysis
    Bhandari, Mohit
    Devereaux, P. J.
    McKee, Michael D.
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2006, 77 (02) : 279 - 284
  • [40] Is distal locking screw necessary for intramedullary nailing in the treatment of humeral shaft fractures? A comparative cohort study
    Romain Colombi
    Thomas Chauvet
    Ludovic Labattut
    Brice Viard
    Emmanuel Baulot
    Pierre Martz
    International Orthopaedics, 2019, 43 : 2151 - 2160