Ecological function transitions of land use in the Beibu Gulf Economic Zone from the perspective of production-living-ecological space

被引:0
|
作者
Zhou, Guipeng [1 ,2 ]
Long, Hualou [1 ,3 ]
Jiang, Yanfeng [3 ]
Tu, Shuangshuang [4 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geog Sci & Nat Resources Res, Key Lab Reg Sustainable Dev Modelling, Beijing 100101, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Coll Resources & Environm, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Guangxi Univ, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Nanning 530004, Peoples R China
[4] Nanning Normal Univ, Key Lab Environm Change & Resources Use Beibu Gulf, Nanning 530001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
land use transitions; ecological function; eco-environmental quality; production-living-ecological spaces; dominant and recessive factors; Beibu Gulf; ENVIRONMENT; AREA;
D O I
10.1007/s11442-024-2290-3
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
The ecological function of land use is the basis for developing an ecological civilization and realizing sustainable development. This paper may help guide the coordination of economic development and ecological development in China's coastal border areas. Based on theoretical analysis, this paper studies the spatiotemporal evolution of the functional spaces and the ecological function transitions of land use in the Beibu Gulf Economic Zone (BGEZ) by analyzing patterns, processes, and factors by applying eco-environmental quality index, grid subdivision, kriging interpolation, barycenter model, and Geodetector. This paper constructs a theoretical framework of ecological function transitions of land use based on the research idea of "system-pattern-process-factor", and carries out empirical research. Some conclusions can be drawn as follows: (1) The ecological space in the BGEZ has continuously decreased, converting mainly into agricultural production space and industrial-mining production space. The production space has expanded slowly. The area of living space in the BGEZ has increased rapidly. (2) The ecological function of land use in the BGEZ has continued to weaken, especially in the southern part of the BGEZ. The "high - sub-high" quality zones of ecological function are retreating to the north. (3) There were more deterioration transition areas than optimization transition areas of ecological function in the BGEZ. The former were mostly located in the central and southern urbanized areas of the BGEZ, whereas the latter were mostly located in the edge zones of district and county units. (4) As for the driving factors of the deterioration transitions of land use ecological function in the BGEZ, the significant trend of "de-ecologization" of the land cover/land use structure was the dominant driving factor; the interactions among the "natural-socioeconomic-managerial" systems were the main recessive factor. The natural system played a fundamental role, and the driving force of natural factors was the strongest. The industrialization, urbanization, and GDP increment in the socioeconomic system and the policy positioning of development intensity in the managerial system played a significant role. The interactions among natural factors, road construction, and industrial non-agricultural transformation had a "fuze" effect on stimulating driving forces.
引用
收藏
页码:2212 / 2238
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ecological security assessment of Yunnan Province, China in the context of Production-Living-Ecological space division
    Liu, Fang
    Zhang, Qian
    Wang, Jinliang
    Liu, Yuexiong
    Wang, Wanbin
    Li, Sen
    ECOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 2024, 14 (08):
  • [32] Optimizing the Production-Living-Ecological Space for Reducing the Ecosystem Services Deficit
    Fu, Xinxin
    Wang, Xiaofeng
    Zhou, Jitao
    Ma, Jiahao
    LAND, 2021, 10 (10)
  • [33] Study on Eco-Environmental Effects of Land-Use Transitions and Their Influencing Factors in the Central and Southern Liaoning Urban Agglomeration: A Production-Living-Ecological Perspective
    Pang, Ruiqiu
    Hu, Ning
    Zhou, Jingrui
    Sun, Dongqi
    Ye, Hongying
    LAND, 2022, 11 (06)
  • [34] Eco-Environmental Effects of "Production-Living-Ecological" Space Land Use Changes and Recommendations for Ecological Restoration: A Case Study of the Weibei Dryland in Shaanxi Province
    Jin, Junfang
    Yin, Shuyan
    Yin, Hanmin
    Bai, Xin
    LAND, 2023, 12 (05)
  • [35] Evaluation of Ecological Carrying Capacity in Western Jilin Province from the Perspective of "Production-Living-Ecological Spaces" Coupling Coordination
    Xu, Jiarong
    Tong, Zhijun
    Liu, Xingpeng
    Zhang, Jiquan
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [36] A Production-Living-Ecological Space Model for Land-Use Optimisation: A case study of the core Tumen River region in China
    Tian, Fenghao
    Li, Mingyu
    Han, Xulong
    Liu, Hui
    Mo, Boxian
    ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2020, 437 (437)
  • [37] Ecological Security Assessment and Territory Spatial Restoration and Management of Inland River Basin-Based on the Perspective of Production-Living-Ecological Space
    Zhang, Xuebin
    Wang, Ziyang
    Liu, Yue
    Shi, Jing
    Du, Hucheng
    LAND, 2023, 12 (08)
  • [38] The spatial transition of production-living-ecological space in Beijing and its effect on carbon storage under the perspective of human-land relation
    Paruke, Wusimanjiang
    Ai, Dong
    Ji, Zheng-Xin
    Duan, Wen-Kai
    Wang, Nan
    Hao, Jin-Min
    Zhongguo Huanjing Kexue/China Environmental Science, 2024, 44 (05): : 2786 - 2798
  • [39] Assessing the Trade-off between Ecological Conservation and Local Development in Wuyishan National Park: A Production-Living-Ecological Space Perspective
    Du, Xishihui
    Wang, Zhaoguo
    Wang, Jingli
    Liu, Xiao
    FORESTS, 2024, 15 (07):
  • [40] Evaluation of Production-Living-Ecological Functions in Support of SDG Target 11.a: Case Study of the Guangxi Beibu Gulf Urban Agglomeration, China
    Ling, Ziyan
    Jiang, Weiguo
    Liao, Chaoming
    Li, Yanshun
    Ling, Yurong
    Peng, Kaifeng
    Deng, Yawen
    DIVERSITY-BASEL, 2022, 14 (06):