Lifestyle intervention to prevent type 2 diabetes after a pregnancy complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis update

被引:0
|
作者
Bracco, Paula Andreghetto [1 ,3 ]
Reichelt, Angela Jacob [2 ]
Alves, Luisia Feichas [4 ]
Vidor, Pedro Rodrigues [5 ]
Oppermann, Maria Lucia Rocha [6 ,7 ]
Duncan, Bruce Bartholow [3 ,7 ]
Schmidt, Maria Ines [3 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande Do Sul, Stat Dept, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[2] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Endocrinol & Metab Serv, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Postgrad Program Epidemiol, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Cent Lib, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[5] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Med, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[6] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Porto Alegre, Brazil
[7] Hosp Clin Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, Brazil
来源
DIABETOLOGY & METABOLIC SYNDROME | 2025年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
Diabetes mellitus; Gestational diabetes; Lifestyle; Meta-analysis; WOMEN; WEIGHT; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1186/s13098-025-01606-x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BackgroundWomen with prior gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are at increased risk of type 2 diabetes, and lifestyle intervention (LSI) offered a decade after pregnancy is effective in preventing diabetes. However, since diabetes frequently onsets in the initial years following pregnancy, preventive actions should be implemented closer to pregnancy. We aimed to assess the effect of lifestyle interventions, compared to standard care, in reducing the incidence of diabetes following a pregnancy complicated by GDM.MethodsWe searched the Cochrane Library, Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science from inception to July 21, 2024, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing LSI to prevent diabetes following gestational diabetes. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We evaluated the risk of bias with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool RoB-2 and the certainty of the evidence with GRADE methodology. We used the DerSimonian-Laird random effects pooling method and evaluated heterogeneity with the I2 statistic and the Chi2 test.ResultsWe identified 24 studies involving 9017 women. In studies without high risk of bias (18 studies; 8,357 women), LSI reduced the incidence of diabetes by 19% (RR = 0.81; 95%CI 0.71.0.93). The effect was significant and more protective (RR = 0.78; 0.65, 0.94) in studies evaluating women with GDM identified specifically as at a higher risk of diabetes, compared to those intervening on women with GDM irrespective of risk (RR = 0.85; 0.70, 1.04). Similarly, when expressed in absolute terms, the overall number needed to treat (NNT) was 56 considering all studies, 71 for women with GDM irrespective of risk, and 31 for women with GDM at high risk. The intervention produced a lower weight gain (mean difference=-0.88 kg;-1.52, -0.23 for all studies; -0.62 kg;-1.22, -0.02 for studies without high risk of bias). The effects were robust in sensitivity analyses and supported by evidence of moderate certainty for diabetes and weight change.ConclusionsLSI offered to women with GDM following pregnancy is effective in preventing type 2 diabetes, despite the small postpartum weight change. The impact of LSI on incidence reduction was greater for women with GDM at a higher diabetes risk.PROSPERORegistration number CRD42024555086, Jun 28, 2024.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Physical Activity Interventions in Pregnancy and Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Russo, Lindsey M.
    Nobles, Carrie
    Ertel, Karen A.
    Chasan-Taber, Lisa
    Whitcomb, Brian W.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 125 (03): : 576 - 582
  • [32] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tiong, Patricia
    Kosmider, Logan
    Lassi, Zohra S.
    Arstall, Margaret A.
    Andraweera, Prabha H.
    ENDOCRINE, 2023, 80 (02) : 283 - 291
  • [33] Prevalence of gestational diabetes mellitus in Pakistan: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Muhammad Adnan
    Muhammad Aasim
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 24
  • [34] Asymmetric dimethylarginine and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Patricia Tiong
    Logan Kosmider
    Zohra S. Lassi
    Margaret A. Arstall
    Prabha H. Andraweera
    Endocrine, 2023, 80 : 283 - 291
  • [35] Telemedicine interventions for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rasekaba, Tshepo M.
    Furler, John
    Blackberry, Irene
    Tacey, Mark
    Gray, Kathleen
    Lim, Kwang
    DIABETES RESEARCH AND CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2015, 110 (01) : 1 - 9
  • [36] Gestational diabetes mellitus prevalence in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mocellin, Lucas Pitrez
    Gomes, Hewellynn de Azeredo
    Sona, Lincoln
    Giacomini, Gabrielle Maria
    Pizzuti, Eduarda Pires
    Nunes, Gabrieli Borges
    Zanchet, Tulio Marcos
    de Macedo, Juliana Lopes
    CADERNOS DE SAUDE PUBLICA, 2024, 40 (08):
  • [37] A portrait of gestational diabetes mellitus in Brazil: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Iser, Betine Pinto Moehlecke
    Stein, Caroline
    Alves, Luisia Feichas
    Carvalho, Morgana Lourenco de Souza
    Espinoza, Sergio Angelo Rojas
    Schmidt, Maria Ines
    ARCHIVES OF ENDOCRINOLOGY METABOLISM, 2022, 67 (06):
  • [38] Homocysteine level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zheng, Yang
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2021, 37 (11) : 987 - 994
  • [39] GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS AND PLACENTAL WEIGHT: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Arcot, Amrita
    Parks, Kalynn
    Beck, Celeste
    Gallagher, Kelly
    Gernand, Alison D.
    PLACENTA, 2023, 140 : E32 - E33
  • [40] Visfatin level and gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jiang, Yong-Kuan
    Deng, Hai-Yan
    Qiao, Zeng-Yong
    Gong, Fang-Xiao
    ARCHIVES OF PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 127 (05) : 468 - 478