Cancer care treatment attrition in adults: Measurement approaches and inequities in patient dropout rates - a rapid review

被引:0
|
作者
Shand, Jenny [1 ]
Stovold, Elizabeth [2 ]
Goulding, Lucy [2 ]
Cheema, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCLPartners, 170 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7HA, England
关键词
Attrition rates; Inequalities in healthcare; Cancer treatment adherence; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS; CELL LUNG-CANCER; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; REAL-WORLD; RESOURCE UTILIZATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-13096-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCancer treatment attrition refers to the discontinuation of prescribed cancer therapies before completion. It can significantly impact patient outcomes and cancer survival rates making it a critical concern. There is growing evidence on inequalities in cancer care, the avoidable systematic differences in the health of different groups of people. Understanding the extent of treatment attrition, why it happens, for whom, and associated inequalities may improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes.MethodsA rapid review was conducted to identify existing evidence on measures of cancer treatment attrition, definitions, reasons for attrition and potential inequalities. The review followed a systematic approach but with abbreviated processes to facilitate quicker evidence synthesis. Searches were restricted to MEDLINE and Embase databases from their inception dates to May 7, 2024. Additional searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and key grey literature from relevant organizations. Inclusion criteria were adults with any type of cancer undergoing treatment, with studies reporting quantitative or qualitative data on treatment attrition conducted outside of clinical trials. Exclusion criteria included studies on children or adolescents, clinical trials, non-English publications, and various non-research article types. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using standardized tools, and studies were synthesized narratively.ResultsThe search retrieved 1,353 references, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective. Studies covered various cancer types and treatments, reporting measures of attrition and reasons for treatment drop-out. Factors influencing attrition included disease progression, death, clinical deterioration, treatment toxicity, and socioeconomic factors such as lower income or socioeconomic disadvantage.ConclusionsThis review highlights significant variability in how treatment attrition is measured and defined, and suggests potential inequalities in who discontinues treatment. Standardized measures of attrition and data collection on reasons for discontinuation are essential to improve cancer care outcomes and equity. Future research should focus on developing these standardized metrics and exploring interventions targeting identified disparities to support cancer patients to complete treatment and improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [21] Patient and carer experience of nutrition care throughout treatment for head and neck cancer: a systematic qualitative review and thematic synthesis
    Hiatt, Joanne S.
    Brown, Teresa E.
    Banks, Merrilyn
    Lewis, Carrie-Anne
    Bauer, Judith
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2020, 28 (12) : 5633 - 5647
  • [22] Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children and Adolescent/Young Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties
    Wayant, Cole
    Bixler, Kaylea
    Garrett, Morgan
    Mack, Jennifer W.
    Wright, Drew
    Vassar, Matt
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2022, 11 (01) : 78 - 94
  • [23] How Can Health Care Professionals Communicate Effectively with Adolescent and Young Adults Who Have Completed Cancer Treatment? A Systematic Review
    Smith, Luke A. M.
    Critoph, Deborah J.
    Hatcher, Helen M.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2020, 9 (03) : 328 - 340
  • [24] Role of the geriatrician, primary care practitioner, nurses, and collaboration with oncologists during cancer treatment delivery for older adults: A narrative review of the literature
    Puts, Martine T. E.
    Strohschein, Fay J.
    Del Giudice, M. Elisabeth
    Jin, Rana
    Loucks, Allison
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    Alibhai, Shabbir H. M.
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2018, 9 (04) : 398 - 404
  • [25] Accidental Fall Rates in Community-Dwelling Adults Compared to Cancer Survivors During and Post-Treatment: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
    Bird, Marie-Louise
    Cheney, Michael J.
    Williams, Andrew D.
    ONCOLOGY NURSING FORUM, 2016, 43 (02) : E64 - E72
  • [26] Understanding how shared decision-making approaches and patient aids influence patients with advanced cancer when deciding on palliative treatments and care: A realist review
    Edwards, Michelle
    Holland-Hart, Daniella
    Mann, Mala
    Seddon, Kathy
    Buckle, Peter
    Longo, Mirella
    Byrne, Anthony
    Nelson, Annmarie
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2023, 26 (06) : 2109 - 2126
  • [27] The effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decisions, supportive care received, and postoperative outcomes in older adults with cancer undergoing surgery: A systematic review
    Disalvo, Domenica
    Garcia, Maja V.
    Soo, Wee Kheng
    Phillips, Jane
    Lane, Heather
    Treleaven, Elise
    To, Timothy
    Power, Jack
    Amgarth-Duff, Ingrid
    Agar, Meera
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2025, 16 (03)
  • [28] Socio-economic inequalities in patient, primary care, referral, diagnostic, and treatment intervals on the lung cancer care pathway: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Forrest L.F.
    Sowden S.
    Rubin G.
    White M.
    Adams J.
    Systematic Reviews, 3 (1)
  • [29] Are patient-reported outcomes useful in post-treatment follow-up care for women with early breast cancer? A scoping review
    Riis, Cathrine Lundgaard
    Bechmann, Troels
    Jensen, Pernille Tine
    Coulter, Angela
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    PATIENT-RELATED OUTCOME MEASURES, 2019, 10 : 117 - 127
  • [30] EFFECT OF PATIENT RURALALITY, DISTANCE FROM TREATMENT CENTER AND THE USE OF OUTSIDE HOSPITALS AND HOME HEALTH CARE ON CENTRAL LINE INFECTION AND REMOVAL RATES IN PEDIATRIC CANCER PATIENTS
    Fluchel, Mark
    Mangum, D. Spencer
    Druzgal, Colleen
    Verma, Anupam
    PEDIATRIC BLOOD & CANCER, 2010, 55 (05) : 949 - 949