Cancer care treatment attrition in adults: Measurement approaches and inequities in patient dropout rates - a rapid review

被引:0
|
作者
Shand, Jenny [1 ]
Stovold, Elizabeth [2 ]
Goulding, Lucy [2 ]
Cheema, Kate [2 ]
机构
[1] UCL, 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[2] UCLPartners, 170 Tottenham Court Rd, London W1T 7HA, England
关键词
Attrition rates; Inequalities in healthcare; Cancer treatment adherence; METASTATIC COLORECTAL-CANCER; WORLD TREATMENT PATTERNS; CELL LUNG-CANCER; CLINICAL-OUTCOMES; REAL-WORLD; RESOURCE UTILIZATION;
D O I
10.1186/s12885-024-13096-7
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BackgroundCancer treatment attrition refers to the discontinuation of prescribed cancer therapies before completion. It can significantly impact patient outcomes and cancer survival rates making it a critical concern. There is growing evidence on inequalities in cancer care, the avoidable systematic differences in the health of different groups of people. Understanding the extent of treatment attrition, why it happens, for whom, and associated inequalities may improve cancer care delivery and patient outcomes.MethodsA rapid review was conducted to identify existing evidence on measures of cancer treatment attrition, definitions, reasons for attrition and potential inequalities. The review followed a systematic approach but with abbreviated processes to facilitate quicker evidence synthesis. Searches were restricted to MEDLINE and Embase databases from their inception dates to May 7, 2024. Additional searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, and key grey literature from relevant organizations. Inclusion criteria were adults with any type of cancer undergoing treatment, with studies reporting quantitative or qualitative data on treatment attrition conducted outside of clinical trials. Exclusion criteria included studies on children or adolescents, clinical trials, non-English publications, and various non-research article types. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed using standardized tools, and studies were synthesized narratively.ResultsThe search retrieved 1,353 references, with 40 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective. Studies covered various cancer types and treatments, reporting measures of attrition and reasons for treatment drop-out. Factors influencing attrition included disease progression, death, clinical deterioration, treatment toxicity, and socioeconomic factors such as lower income or socioeconomic disadvantage.ConclusionsThis review highlights significant variability in how treatment attrition is measured and defined, and suggests potential inequalities in who discontinues treatment. Standardized measures of attrition and data collection on reasons for discontinuation are essential to improve cancer care outcomes and equity. Future research should focus on developing these standardized metrics and exploring interventions targeting identified disparities to support cancer patients to complete treatment and improve outcomes.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Delirium in the intensive care unit patient: A review of the current approaches to diagnosis and treatment
    Giavasi, G.
    Samartzis, L.
    Nanas, S.
    ARCHIVES OF HELLENIC MEDICINE, 2015, 32 (03): : 263 - 279
  • [2] Reenvisioning End-of-Life Care Quality Measurement for Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer-Novel Patient-Centered Indicators and Approaches
    Ananth, Prasanna
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2021, 4 (08)
  • [3] A review of measurement of patient preferences for treatment outcomes after prostate cancer - Discussion
    Kantoff, PW
    Lubeck, DP
    Lee, WR
    Carroll, PR
    UROLOGY, 2002, 60 (3A) : 77 - 78
  • [4] Care provided by older adults in active cancer treatment to a spouse: A scoping review
    Donison, Valentina
    Yang, Helen
    Ayala, Ana Patricia
    Wills, Aria
    Alibhai, Shabbir M. H.
    Puts, Martine
    JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2022, 13 (06) : 784 - 787
  • [5] A rapid review of patient reported outcomes for patients with renal cell cancer or hepatocellular cancer on treatment with targeted therapies
    de la Serna, C. Diez de Los Rios
    Kotronoulas, G.
    Drury, A.
    Oldenmenger, W. H.
    Kelly, D.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2021, 32 : S1274 - S1274
  • [6] Survivorship Care Planning for Young Adults After Cancer Treatment: Understanding Care Patterns and Patient-Reported Outcomes
    Szalda, Dava
    Schapira, Marilyn M.
    Jacobs, Linda A.
    Palmer, Steven C.
    Vachani, Carolyn
    Metz, James
    Hill-Kayser, Christine
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2018, 7 (04) : 430 - 437
  • [7] Patient and health professional's perceived barriers to the delivery of psychosocial care to adults with cancer: a systematic review
    Dilworth, Sophie
    Higgins, Isabel
    Parker, Vicki
    Kelly, Brian
    Turner, Jane
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2014, 23 (06) : 601 - 612
  • [8] A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
    Neijenhuijs, Koen I.
    Jansen, Femke
    Aaronson, Neil K.
    Bredart, Anne
    Groenvold, Mogens
    Holzner, Bernhard
    Terwee, Caroline B.
    Cuijpers, Pim
    Verdonck-de Leeuw, Irma M.
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2018, 26 (08) : 2551 - 2560
  • [9] A systematic review of the measurement properties of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer In-patient Satisfaction with Care Questionnaire, the EORTC IN-PATSAT32
    Koen I. Neijenhuijs
    Femke Jansen
    Neil K. Aaronson
    Anne Brédart
    Mogens Groenvold
    Bernhard Holzner
    Caroline B. Terwee
    Pim Cuijpers
    Irma M. Verdonck-de Leeuw
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2018, 26 : 2551 - 2560
  • [10] How Does Patient Socioeconomic Position Affect Breast Cancer Surgical Treatment and Mortality?: A Rapid Review
    Schubbe, Danielle
    Yen, Renata W.
    Durand, Marie-Anne
    BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY, 2021, 13 : 595 - 601