Blast Loading Prediction of Complex Structures Based on Bayesian Deep Active Learning

被引:0
|
作者
Pan, Meilin [1 ]
Peng, Weiwen [1 ]
Leng, Chunjiang [1 ]
Qiu, Jiulu [2 ]
Zhong, Wei [2 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Sch Intelligent Syst Engn, Guangzhou 510275, Peoples R China
[2] Northwest Inst Nucl Technol, State Key Lab Intense Pulsed Radiat Simulat & Effe, Xian 710024, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL | 2025年 / 15卷 / 03期
关键词
complex structures; blast loading; Bayesian deep active learning; uncertainty quantification;
D O I
10.3390/app15031147
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
The prediction of blast loading for complex structures using deep learning requires extensive training data from field experiments or numerical simulations. However, the destructive nature of explosions complicates the collection of adequate field data, and traditional simulations are often time-consuming. To address these challenges, a Bayesian deep learning approach is proposed that quantifies prediction uncertainty. This method utilizes an uncertain selection strategy to actively choose high-quality samples, enhancing the simulation process and iteratively expanding the training dataset. The experimental results demonstrate that this Bayesian deep active learning method achieves a mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of 6.1% for peak overpressure predictions. Additionally, more than 73.1% of confidence intervals include true values, with prediction times under 20 ms for single-point blasts. Notably, only 60% of the training data is required to achieve the same accuracy as conventional deep learning methods. This approach facilitates rapid and reliable predictions of blast loading for complex structures while significantly reducing training costs.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Active learning with deep Bayesian neural network for laser control
    Galvin, Thomas C.
    Herriot, Sandrine I.
    Ng, Brenda
    Williams, Wade H.
    Talathi, Sachin S.
    Spinka, Thomas
    Sistrunk, Emily F.
    Siders, Craig W.
    Haefner, Constantin L.
    OPTICS AND PHOTONICS FOR INFORMATION PROCESSING XII, 2018, 10751
  • [32] Bayesian Active Learning for Choice Models With Deep Gaussian Processes
    Yang, Jie
    Klabjan, Diego
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, 2021, 22 (02) : 1080 - 1092
  • [33] Bayesian optimization and deep learning for steering wheel angle prediction
    Alessandro Riboni
    Nicolò Ghioldi
    Antonio Candelieri
    Matteo Borrotti
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [34] A deep learning based approach for response prediction of beam-like structures
    Wang T.
    Altabey W.A.
    Noori M.
    Ghiasi R.
    SDHM Structural Durability and Health Monitoring, 2020, 14 (04): : 315 - 338
  • [35] Bayesian optimization and deep learning for steering wheel angle prediction
    Riboni, Alessandro
    Ghioldi, Nicolo
    Candelieri, Antonio
    Borrotti, Matteo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [36] Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Learning to Rank: A Case Study in Answer Selection
    Wang, Qunbo
    Wu, Wenjun
    Qi, Yuxing
    Zhao, Yongchi
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2022, 34 (11) : 5251 - 5262
  • [37] TOWARDS AN ACTIVE LEARNING APPROACH TO TOOL CONDITION MONITORING WITH BAYESIAN DEEP LEARNING
    Martinez-Arellano, Giovanna
    Ratchev, Svetan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD INTERNATIONAL ECMS CONFERENCE ON MODELLING AND SIMULATION (ECMS 2019), 2019, 33 (01): : 223 - 229
  • [38] Machine-Learning Prediction of Underwater Shock Loading on Structures
    Zhang, Mou
    Drikakis, Dimitris
    Li, Lei
    Yan, Xiu
    COMPUTATION, 2019, 7 (04)
  • [39] Attention mechanism-based deep learning for heat load prediction in blast furnace ironmaking process
    Xu, Hong-Wei
    Qin, Wei
    Sun, Yan-Ning
    Lv, You-Long
    Zhang, Jie
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2024, 35 (03) : 1207 - 1220
  • [40] Deep Active Learning for Solvability Prediction in Power Systems
    Yichen Zhang
    Jianzhe Liu
    Feng Qiu
    Tianqi Hong
    Rui Yao
    Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 2022, 10 (06) : 1773 - 1777