Thermal ablation of margins for recurrence prevention after endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Santo, Paula [1 ]
Meine, Gilmara Coelho [2 ]
Holanda, Erica Uchoa [3 ]
Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi [4 ]
Baraldo, Stefano [5 ]
Nau, Angelica Luciana [6 ]
Henry Moore, Karollyna Maria [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Fed Univ Sao Carlos, Diagnost Imaging & Specialized Diag Unit, 111 Luis Vaz Camoes St Vila Celina, BR-13566448 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Feevale Univ, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Ctr Christus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[4] Evangel Univ Goias, Anapolis, GO, Brazil
[5] Barretos Canc Hosp, Barretos, SP, Brazil
[6] Jaragua Hosp, Jaragua Do Sul, SC, Brazil
[7] Inst Univ Ciencias Salud, Fdn Barcelo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Thermal ablation; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Colonoscopy; COLONIC POLYPS; ARGON PLASMA; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11498-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal lesions can be challenging, and residual lesions after EMR can progress to colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding thermal ablation of margins [using argon plasma coagulation (APC) or snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)] in reducing recurrence rates after EMR. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were overall adverse events (AEs) and delayed bleeding. We pre-specified subgroup analyses by lesion size, thermal ablation technique, and resection type. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Results We included four RCTs (815 patients and 872 colorectal lesions). Thermal ablation reduced recurrence rates [RR 0.31; 95%CI (0.20-0.47); I2 = 0%], while the risk of overall AEs [RR 0.93; 95%CI (0.73-1.17); I2 = 0%] was similar between both groups. The results were consistent in subgroup analyses of APC, STSC, polyps > 20 mm, and piece-meal resection. Conclusion Thermal ablation of margins following EMR reduced recurrence rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 748
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Cold Snare Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colon Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Ahmed, Khalid
    Abbas, Daniyal
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    McDonald, Nicholas
    Mohamed, Mouhand F.
    Umar, Shifa
    Chandan, Saurabh
    Hanson, Brian
    Bilal, Mohammad
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 117 (10): : S115 - S115
  • [22] Cold snare endoscopic mucosal resection for colon polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Abdallah, Mohamed
    Ahmed, Khalid
    Abbas, Daniyal
    Mohamed, Mouhand F. H.
    Suryawanshi, Gaurav
    Mcdonald, Nicholas
    Wilson, Natalie
    Umar, Shifa
    Shaukat, Aasma
    Bilal, Mohammad
    ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 55 (12) : 1083 - 1094
  • [23] Effects of resection margins on local recurrence of osteosarcoma in extremity and pelvis: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    He, Fangzhou
    Zhang, Weibin
    Shen, Yuhui
    Yu, Pei
    Bao, Qiyuan
    Wen, Junxiang
    Hu, Chuanzhen
    Qiu, Shijing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 36 : 283 - 292
  • [24] ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION AND ENDOSCOPIC SUBMUCOSAL DISSECTION FOR ILEOCECAL VALVE NEOPLASIA: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Donaldson, Kieran
    Arif, Arif A.
    Qian, Hong
    Lam, Eric
    Shahidi, Neal C.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB140 - AB141
  • [25] Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions
    Arezzo, Alberto
    Passera, Roberto
    Marchese, Nicola
    Galloro, Giuseppe
    Manta, Raffaele
    Cirocchi, Roberto
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2016, 4 (01) : 18 - 29
  • [26] Major variance in scoring of endoscopic recurrence after ileocolic resection for Crohns Disease - a systematic review and meta-analysis
    De Willebois, E. Van Der Does
    Bellato, V.
    van Dieren, S.
    Duijvestein, M.
    Buskens, C.
    Vignali, A.
    Bemelman, W.
    JOURNAL OF CROHNS & COLITIS, 2023, 17 : I348 - I349
  • [27] Efficacy of Underwater Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Management of Large Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Kandel, Pujan
    Dawood, Thair
    Gomez, Victoria
    Brahmbhatt, Bhaumik
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Wallace, Michael
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S470 - S471
  • [28] THERMAL ABLATION OF POST-EMR-DEFECTS REDUCES ADENOMA RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF COLONIC POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND METAANALYSIS
    Kandel, Pujan
    Abusalih, Mohamed
    Yadav, Deepesh
    Hussain, Murtaza
    Dhungana, Santosh K.
    Dawood, Thair
    Raimondo, Massimo
    Bachuwa, Ghassan
    Wallace, Michael B.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2021, 93 (06) : AB89 - AB90
  • [29] Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Polyps: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Choi, Alyssa
    Moosvi, Zain
    Roccato, Mary Kathryn
    Shah, Sagar
    Hamerski, Christopher
    Samarasena, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S494 - S494
  • [30] Underwater vs Conventional Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Colorectal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Garg, Rajat
    Singh, Amandeep
    Mohan, Babu P.
    Mankaney, Gautam
    Regueiro, Miguel
    Chahal, Prabhleen
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 115 : S69 - S69