Thermal ablation of margins for recurrence prevention after endoscopic mucosal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:1
|
作者
Santo, Paula [1 ]
Meine, Gilmara Coelho [2 ]
Holanda, Erica Uchoa [3 ]
Barbosa, Eduardo Cerchi [4 ]
Baraldo, Stefano [5 ]
Nau, Angelica Luciana [6 ]
Henry Moore, Karollyna Maria [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Fed Univ Sao Carlos, Diagnost Imaging & Specialized Diag Unit, 111 Luis Vaz Camoes St Vila Celina, BR-13566448 Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil
[2] Feevale Univ, Novo Hamburgo, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Ctr Christus, Fortaleza, CE, Brazil
[4] Evangel Univ Goias, Anapolis, GO, Brazil
[5] Barretos Canc Hosp, Barretos, SP, Brazil
[6] Jaragua Hosp, Jaragua Do Sul, SC, Brazil
[7] Inst Univ Ciencias Salud, Fdn Barcelo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
关键词
Thermal ablation; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Colonoscopy; COLONIC POLYPS; ARGON PLASMA; RECOMMENDATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-024-11498-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aims Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal lesions can be challenging, and residual lesions after EMR can progress to colorectal cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of adding thermal ablation of margins [using argon plasma coagulation (APC) or snare tip soft coagulation (STSC)] in reducing recurrence rates after EMR. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) identified from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. The primary outcome was the recurrence rate. Secondary outcomes were overall adverse events (AEs) and delayed bleeding. We pre-specified subgroup analyses by lesion size, thermal ablation technique, and resection type. The random-effects model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the Cochran's Q test and I2 statistics. Results We included four RCTs (815 patients and 872 colorectal lesions). Thermal ablation reduced recurrence rates [RR 0.31; 95%CI (0.20-0.47); I2 = 0%], while the risk of overall AEs [RR 0.93; 95%CI (0.73-1.17); I2 = 0%] was similar between both groups. The results were consistent in subgroup analyses of APC, STSC, polyps > 20 mm, and piece-meal resection. Conclusion Thermal ablation of margins following EMR reduced recurrence rates while maintaining a comparable safety profile.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 748
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] THERMAL ABLATION OF MUCOSAL DEFECT MARGINS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION REDUCES ADENOMA RECURRENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Raymundo, Nikko Theodore
    Dumagpi, Joseph Erwin
    Lin, Tim
    Co, Jonard
    GUT, 2021, 70 : A126 - A126
  • [2] THERMAL ABLATION OF MUCOSAL DEFECT MARGINS TO PREVENT LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE NONPEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Meulen, Lonne W. T.
    Bogie, Roel
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Masclee, Ad
    Moons, L. M. G.
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2022, 95 (06) : AB187 - AB188
  • [3] Efficacy and Safety of Thermal Ablation after Endoscopic Mucosal Resection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
    Haghbin, Hossein
    Zakirkhodjaev, Nuruddinkhodja
    Fatima, Rawish
    Kamal, Faisal
    Aziz, Muhammad
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (05)
  • [4] Thermal Ablation of Mucosal Defect Margins Reduces Adenoma Recurrence After Colonic Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
    Klein, Amir
    Tate, David J.
    Jayasekeran, Vanoo
    Hourigan, Luke
    Singh, Rajvinder
    Brown, Gregor
    Bahin, Farzan F.
    Burgess, Nicholas
    Williams, Stephen J.
    Lee, Eric
    Sidhu, Mayenaaz
    Byth, Karen
    Bourke, Michael J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 156 (03) : 604 - +
  • [5] Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins reduces adenoma recurrence after colonic endoscopic mucosal resection
    Keklikkiran, Caglayan
    Ozdogan, Osman Cavit
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 30 (06): : 580 - 581
  • [6] Local recurrence after endoscopic mucosal resection of nonpedunculated colorectal lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Belderbos, Tim D. G.
    Leenders, Max
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    Siersema, Peter D.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2014, 46 (05) : 388 - U121
  • [7] THERMAL ABLATION OF MARGINS AFTER ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION OF LARGE, NON-PEDUNCULATED COLORECTAL POLYPS TO PREVENT LOCAL NEOPLASIA RECURRENCE: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS OF RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS
    Dang, Frances
    Balfour, Marie
    Mendoza, Brian
    Chehade, Nabil El Hage
    Lin, Andy
    Le, Bryant
    Cheung, David
    Tavangar, Amirali
    Jariwalla, Neil
    Kwon, Joshua
    Chang, Kenneth
    Samarasena, Jason
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 99 (06) : AB606 - AB606
  • [8] Thermal ablation of mucosal defect margins to prevent local recurrence of large colorectal polyps: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Meulen, Lonne W. T.
    Bogie, Roel M. M.
    Winkens, Bjorn
    Masclee, Ad A. M.
    Moons, Leon M. G.
    ENDOSCOPY INTERNATIONAL OPEN, 2022, 10 (08) : E1127 - E1135
  • [9] COMPARISON OF ADENOMA RECURRENCE RATE BETWEEN STANDARD ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION VS ENDOSCOPIC MUCOSAL RESECTION WITH ADJUVANT THERMAL ABLATION INCLUDING THE NOVEL HYBRID APC: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS
    Kudaravalli, Pujitha
    Kumar, Vishnu Charan Suresh
    Mohan, Babu
    Kelita, Singh
    Adler, Douglas
    Sapkota, Bishnu
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2023, 97 (06) : AB520 - AB521
  • [10] Meta-analysis and systematic review of colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Kakugawa, Yasuo
    Gotoda, Takuji
    Antillon, Daphne
    Saito, Yutaka
    Antillon, Mainor R.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 15 (34) : 4273 - 4277