Effects of chronic empathic stress on synaptic efficacy, as well as short-term and long-term plasticity at the Schaffer collateral/commissural– CA1 synapses in the dorsal hippocampus of rats

Empathy, the ability to comprehend and share others’ emotional states, impacts brain functions. This in vivo electrophysiological study explored the influence of chronic empathic stress on synaptic efficacy, as well as short-term and long-term plasticity at the Schaffer collateral/Commissural – CA1 synapses in the dorsal hippocampus of rats, in situations of social equality and inequality. Forty-eight male rats were randomized into six groups: control, pseudo-observer, pseudo-demonstrator, observer, demonstrator, and co-demonstrator (Co, Pse-Ob, Pse-De, Ob, De, Co-De) groups. Stress induction (2h/day, 21 days) was performed in situations of equality and inequality. Serum corticosterone levels, slope, amplitude, and area under the curve (AUC) of field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs) were assessed in the hippocampal CA1 area using input-output (I/O) functions, paired-pulse (PP) responses with different interpulse intervals (IPIs), and long-term potentiation (LTP) after high-frequency stimulation (HFS). The fEPSP slope, amplitude, and AUC significantly decreased in all stress groups, especially in the De and Pse-De groups. These parameters were significantly increased in the Co-De and Ob groups compared to the De group. Notably, the corticosterone levels strongly confirmed the electrophysiological findings. Chronic empathic stress could disrupt synaptic efficacy and plasticity in the CA1 area. Empathic stress, involving the presence of cagemates in situations of social equality and inequality, can modify long-term plasticity and serum corticosterone levels in demonstrators and co-demonstrators. Under empathic stress related to situations of inequality, freely moving observers may influence the demonstrators’ stress experience. Therefore, the presence of a conspecific in the social inequality conditions had significant suppressive effects on long-term plasticity, while conversely, under equality conditions, long-term plasticity was favorably improved through social buffering.