Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics and artificial intelligence models in diagnosing lymph node metastasis in head and neck cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Valizadeh, Parya [1 ]
Jannatdoust, Payam [1 ]
Pahlevan-Fallahy, Mohammad-Taha [1 ]
Hassankhani, Amir [2 ,3 ]
Amoukhteh, Melika [2 ,3 ]
Bagherieh, Sara [4 ]
Ghadimi, Delaram J. [5 ]
Gholamrezanezhad, Ali [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tehran Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[2] Univ Southern Calif USC, Keck Sch Med, Dept Radiol, 1441 Eastlake Ave Ste 2315, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Radiol, Rochester, MN USA
[4] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[5] Shahid Beheshti Univ Med Sci, Sch Med, Tehran, Iran
[6] Los Angeles Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
关键词
Head and neck cancer; Lymph node metastasis; Radiomics; Deep learning; PET/CT imaging;
D O I
10.1007/s00234-024-03485-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionHead and neck cancers are the seventh most common globally, with lymph node metastasis (LNM) being a critical prognostic factor, significantly reducing survival rates. Traditional imaging methods have limitations in accurately diagnosing LNM. This meta-analysis aims to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) models in detecting LNM in head and neck cancers.MethodsA systematic search was performed on four databases, looking for studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of AI models in detecting LNM in head and neck cancers. Methodological quality was assessed using the METRICS tool and meta-analysis was performed using bivariate model in R environment.Results23 articles met the inclusion criteria. Due to the absence of external validation in most studies, all analyses were confined to internal validation sets. The meta-analysis revealed a pooled AUC of 91% for CT-based radiomics, 84% for MRI-based radiomics, and 92% for PET/CT-based radiomics. Sensitivity and specificity were highest for PET/CT-based models. The pooled AUC was 92% for deep learning models and 91% for hand-crafted radiomics models. Models based on lymph node features had a pooled AUC of 92%, while those based on primary tumor features had an AUC of 89%. No significant differences were found between deep learning and hand-crafted radiomics models or between lymph node and primary tumor feature-based models.ConclusionRadiomics and deep learning models exhibit promising accuracy in diagnosing LNM in head and neck cancers, particularly with PET/CT. Future research should prioritize multicenter studies with external validation to confirm these results and enhance clinical applicability.
引用
收藏
页码:449 / 467
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] SBRT for Primary Head and Neck Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Malik, N.
    Kim, M.
    Chen, H.
    Poon, I.
    Husain, Z. A.
    Eskander, A.
    Boldt, G.
    Louie, A. V.
    Karam, I.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2020, 108 (03): : E834 - E834
  • [32] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for detecting gastrointestinal luminal pathologies: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Parkash, Om
    Siddiqui, Asra Tus Saleha
    Jiwani, Uswa
    Rind, Fahad
    Padhani, Zahra Ali
    Rizvi, Arjumand
    Hoodbhoy, Zahra
    Das, Jai K.
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [33] Diagnostic accuracy of endocytoscopy via artificial intelligence in colorectal lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Hangbin
    Yang, Xinyu
    Tao, Ye
    Zhang, Xinyi
    Huang, Xuan
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (12):
  • [34] Artificial intelligence in antimicrobial stewardship: a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive performance and diagnostic accuracy
    Pennisi, Flavia
    Pinto, Antonio
    Ricciardi, Giovanni Emanuele
    Signorelli, Carlo
    Gianfredi, Vincenza
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2025, 44 (03) : 463 - 513
  • [35] Diagnostic accuracy of artificial intelligence for approximal caries on bitewing radiographs: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Carvalho, Bruna Katherine Guimaraes
    Nolden, Elias-Leon
    Wenning, Alexander Schulze
    Kiss-Dala, Szilvia
    Agocs, Gergely
    Roth, Ivett
    Keremi, Beata
    Geczi, Zoltan
    Hegyi, Peter
    Kivovics, Marton
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2024, 151
  • [36] Artificial intelligence in diagnosing upper limb musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests
    Droppelmann, Guillermo
    Rodriguez, Constanza
    Jorquera, Carlos
    Feijoo, Felipe
    EFORT OPEN REVIEWS, 2024, 9 (04) : 241 - 251
  • [37] The Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Johnston, E.
    Taylor, S.
    Bannon, F.
    McAllister, S.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108
  • [38] Artificial intelligence performance in ultrasound-based lymph node diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Han, Xinyang
    Qu, Jingguo
    Chui, Man-Lik
    Gunda, Simon Takadiyi
    Chen, Ziman
    Qin, Jing
    King, Ann Dorothy
    Chu, Winnie Chiu-Wing
    Cai, Jing
    Ying, Michael Tin-Cheung
    BMC CANCER, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [39] Artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with abdominopelvic malignancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bedrikovetski, Sergei
    Dudi-Venkata, Nagendra N.
    Maicas, Gabriel
    Kroon, Hidde M.
    Seow, Warren
    Carneiro, Gustavo
    Moore, James W.
    Sammour, Tarik
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE, 2021, 113
  • [40] Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound in detecting distal metastasis of esophageal cancers: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Puli, Srinivas R.
    Reddy, Jyotsna Batapati Krishna
    Bechtold, Matthew L.
    Grewal, Ajitinder
    Bartalos, Christopher
    Bragg, Jack D.
    Ibdah, Jamal A.
    Antillon, Mainor R.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 102 : S439 - S439