Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance APT and DKI imaging for breast cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Shan, Haiyan [2 ]
Ke, Tengfei [1 ]
Bao, Shasha [2 ]
Liu, Yifan [1 ]
Tan, Na [2 ]
Zhou, Xinyan [2 ]
Li, Guochen [2 ]
Zheng, Guangrong [2 ]
Xu, Yongzhou [3 ]
Xie, Yu [1 ]
Liao, Chengde [2 ]
Yang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Med Univ, Yunnan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 519 Kunzhou Rd, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Yanan Hosp Kunming City, Dept Radiol, Yanan Hosp, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] Philips Healthcare, Kunming, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging; Breast cancer; Diffuse kurtosis imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Quantitative molecular resonance imaging; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PRIMARY THERAPY; DIFFUSION; HIGHLIGHTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12935-024-03587-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to compare the performance of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, evaluate molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and determine the diagnostic efficacy of the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) parameters in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases. Methods The study included 168 women who underwent breast APTWI and DKI at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between December 2022 and July 2023. The APT signal intensity (SI), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured before surgery. The differences in the aforementioned qMRI parameters in molecular subtypes of breast cancer were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. The efficacy of each quantitative parameter in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases was evaluated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results Significant differences in qMRI parameters were noted between benign and malignant breast lesions. The Kapp (P < .0001) and APT (P < .05) values were higher for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. Conversely, the ADC (P < .0001) and Dapp (P < .0001) values were lower for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for various parameter combinations. The AUC of Kapp was 0.871, Dapp was 0.872, APT SI was 0.643, DKI + APT was 0.893, DKI + ADC was 0.936, APT + ADC was 0.925, and DKI + APT + ADC was 0.933. Additionally, ADC values (P = .01) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to Kapp (P = .03), Dapp (P = .03), and APT values (P = .06) in distinguishing between different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Conclusions APTWI distinguished benign from malignant breast disease and enhanced the utility of diffusion-weighted MRI. However, it was not superior to DKI and DWI in identifying the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation of Breast Cancer Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
    Pasquero, Giorgia
    Surace, Alessandra
    Ponti, Antonio
    Bortolini, Massimiliano
    Tota, Donatella
    Mano, Maria Piera
    Arisio, Riccardo
    Benedetto, Chiara
    Bau, Maria Grazia
    IN VIVO, 2020, 34 (02): : 909 - 915
  • [22] Performance evaluation of breast cancer diagnosis with mammography, ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging
    Sun, Hang
    Li, Hong
    Si, Shuang
    Qi, Shouliang
    Zhang, Wei
    Ma, He
    Liu, Siqi
    Li, Yingxue
    Qian, Wei
    JOURNAL OF X-RAY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 26 (05) : 805 - 813
  • [23] Response evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer:: Value of magnetic resonance imaging
    Saip, P
    Tenekeci, N
    Aydiner, A
    Dinçer, M
    Inanç, S
    Demir, C
    Oral, EN
    Topuz, E
    CANCER INVESTIGATION, 1999, 17 (08) : 575 - 580
  • [24] Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Breast Cancer
    Tendulkar, Rahul D.
    Chellman-Jeffers, Melanie
    Rybicki, Lisa A.
    Rim, Alice
    Kotwal, Ashwin
    Macklis, Roger
    Obi, Betty B.
    CANCER, 2009, 115 (08) : 1621 - 1630
  • [25] Unenhanced breast magnetic resonance imaging: detection of breast cancer
    Belli, P.
    Bufi, E.
    Bonatesta, A.
    Patrolecco, F.
    Padovano, F.
    Giuliani, M.
    Rinaldi, P.
    Bonomo, L.
    EUROPEAN REVIEW FOR MEDICAL AND PHARMACOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 20 (20) : 4220 - 4229
  • [26] Breast imaging technology Application of magnetic resonance imaging to angiogenesis in breast cancer
    Martin O Leach
    Breast Cancer Research, 3
  • [27] Breast implant evaluation: Pitfall of magnetic resonance imaging
    Abenavoli, FM
    Corelli, R
    Giordano, L
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2003, 111 (01) : 507 - 508
  • [28] Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance imaging-guided surgery in the evaluation of patients with early-stage breast cancer for breast conservation treatment
    Tan, JE
    Orel, SG
    Schnall, MD
    Schultz, DJ
    Solin, LJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 22 (04): : 414 - 418
  • [29] Functional magnetic resonance: biomarkers of response in breast cancer
    Elizabeth AM O'Flynn
    Nandita M deSouza
    Breast Cancer Research, 13
  • [30] Functional magnetic resonance: biomarkers of response in breast cancer
    O'Flynn, Elizabeth A. M.
    deSouza, Nandita M.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2011, 13 (01):