Evaluation of functional magnetic resonance APT and DKI imaging for breast cancer

被引:1
|
作者
Shan, Haiyan [2 ]
Ke, Tengfei [1 ]
Bao, Shasha [2 ]
Liu, Yifan [1 ]
Tan, Na [2 ]
Zhou, Xinyan [2 ]
Li, Guochen [2 ]
Zheng, Guangrong [2 ]
Xu, Yongzhou [3 ]
Xie, Yu [1 ]
Liao, Chengde [2 ]
Yang, Jun [1 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Med Univ, Yunnan Canc Hosp, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 519 Kunzhou Rd, Kunming 650118, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Med Univ, Yanan Hosp Kunming City, Dept Radiol, Yanan Hosp, Kunming, Peoples R China
[3] Philips Healthcare, Kunming, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Amide proton transfer-weighted imaging; Breast cancer; Diffuse kurtosis imaging; Diffusion-weighted imaging; Quantitative molecular resonance imaging; INTERNATIONAL EXPERT CONSENSUS; PRIMARY THERAPY; DIFFUSION; HIGHLIGHTS;
D O I
10.1186/s12935-024-03587-9
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective This study aimed to compare the performance of amide proton transfer-weighted imaging (APTWI) and diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions, evaluate molecular subtypes of breast cancer, and determine the diagnostic efficacy of the quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) parameters in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases. Methods The study included 168 women who underwent breast APTWI and DKI at Yunnan Cancer Hospital between December 2022 and July 2023. The APT signal intensity (SI), apparent kurtosis coefficient (Kapp), non-Gaussian diffusion coefficient (Dapp), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values were measured before surgery. The differences in the aforementioned qMRI parameters in molecular subtypes of breast cancer were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance. The efficacy of each quantitative parameter in differentiating benign from malignant breast diseases was evaluated using the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results Significant differences in qMRI parameters were noted between benign and malignant breast lesions. The Kapp (P < .0001) and APT (P < .05) values were higher for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. Conversely, the ADC (P < .0001) and Dapp (P < .0001) values were lower for malignant tumors than for benign lesions. The diagnostic performance was assessed using the area under the curve (AUC) for various parameter combinations. The AUC of Kapp was 0.871, Dapp was 0.872, APT SI was 0.643, DKI + APT was 0.893, DKI + ADC was 0.936, APT + ADC was 0.925, and DKI + APT + ADC was 0.933. Additionally, ADC values (P = .01) demonstrated superior diagnostic performance compared to Kapp (P = .03), Dapp (P = .03), and APT values (P = .06) in distinguishing between different molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Conclusions APTWI distinguished benign from malignant breast disease and enhanced the utility of diffusion-weighted MRI. However, it was not superior to DKI and DWI in identifying the molecular subtypes of breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Q and A: Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Detection and Evaluation of Breast Cancer
    Wollins, Dana S.
    Somerfield, Mark R.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PRACTICE, 2008, 4 (01) : 18 - 23
  • [2] Imaging in breast cancer: Magnetic resonance imaging
    Lehman, CD
    Schnall, MD
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (05) : 215 - 219
  • [3] Imaging in breast cancer: Magnetic resonance imaging
    Constance D Lehman
    Mitchell D Schnall
    Breast Cancer Research, 7
  • [4] Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast cancer
    Seki, T
    Masuda, Y
    Hachiya, J
    Fukushima, H
    Uchigasaki, S
    XXX WORLD CONGRESS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, VOLS 1-2, 1996, : 1485 - 1488
  • [5] Magnetic resonance imaging in breast cancer
    Van Goethem, M.
    Tjalma, W.
    Schelfout, K.
    Verslegers, I.
    Biltjes, I.
    Parizel, P.
    EJSO, 2006, 32 (09): : 901 - 910
  • [6] Evaluation of Multifocality and Multicentricity With Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Each Breast Cancer Subtype
    Iamurri, Andrea Prochowski
    Ponziani, Martina
    Macchini, Marco
    Fogante, Marco
    Pistelli, Mirco
    De Lisa, Mariagrazia
    Berardi, Rossana
    Giuseppetti, Gian Marco
    CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2018, 18 (02) : E231 - E235
  • [7] Magnetic-resonance imaging for breast cancer
    Drew, PJ
    Turnbull, LW
    Kerin, MJ
    LANCET, 1998, 351 (9116): : 1661 - 1662
  • [8] Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Imaging for Breast Cancer
    Udayakumar, Durga
    Madhuranthakam, Ananth J.
    Dogan, Basak E.
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2024, 32 (01) : 135 - 150
  • [9] Magnetic resonance imaging of invasive breast cancer
    Corr, P.
    Panday, S.
    Seolall, P.
    Booth, H.
    SA JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2005, 9 (03): : 4 - 6
  • [10] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Cancer Recurrence
    P. Belli
    M. Costantini
    M. Romani
    P. Marano
    G. Pastore
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2002, 73 : 223 - 235