Cue combination and individual differences during weight judgements using familiar and newly learned cues

被引:0
|
作者
Kristiansen, Olaf [1 ]
Scheller, Meike [1 ]
Attanayake, Annisha A. [1 ]
Bambrough, Emily A. [1 ]
Nardini, Marko [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Durham, Psychol Dept, Durham, England
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2025年 / 15卷 / 01期
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
INTEGRATION; PERCEPTION; MEMORY; GRIP;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-025-93947-w
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Human perception is often characterised by efficient combination of sensory signals (cues). In recent studies, people could also improve precision via newly learned cues, with applications to enhance perception in healthy and clinical groups. However, it is unclear whether new cues can enhance manual object interactions. To study how new cues are used for object weight perception, people compared weights of containers. With haptic information plus the familiar visual cue of volume, participants showed precision improvements indicating cue combination. By contrast, a group of participants briefly trained with a novel visual cue to weight (line orientation) did not show improvements expected from combination. We then asked whether prolonged training (12 h) with the novel cue would promote combination, testing for significant precision gains individually in six participants. Half of participants showed combination benefits, but these were not clearly related to training, as some combined cues before training. Using an illusion analogous to the size-weight illusion, we also asked whether the novel cue would become an automatic predictor of weight: two participants were susceptible to the illusion. We conclude that weight perception is susceptible to some enhancement, but subject to training effects and individual differences that are not yet understood.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [21] Age and Individual Differences in Prospective Memory During a "Virtual Week": The Roles of Working Memory, Vigilance, Task Regularity, and Cue Focality
    Rose, Nathan S.
    Rendell, Peter G.
    McDaniel, Mark A.
    Aberle, Ingo
    Kliegel, Matthias
    PSYCHOLOGY AND AGING, 2010, 25 (03) : 595 - 605
  • [22] IDENTIFICATION OF MECHANICAL CUES DURING EARLY LIMB BUD DEVELOPMENT USING INDIVIDUAL CELL BASED MODELING
    Sermeus, Yvenn
    Cuvelier, Maxim
    Geris, Liesbet
    Tylzanowski, Przemko
    Smeets, Bart
    TISSUE ENGINEERING PART A, 2022, 28 : S624 - S624
  • [23] Individual differences in selective attention and engagement shape students’ learning from visual cues and instructor presence during online lessons
    Jill King
    Taylor Marcus
    Julie Markant
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [24] Individual differences in selective attention and engagement shape students' learning from visual cues and instructor presence during online lessons
    King, Jill
    Marcus, Taylor
    Markant, Julie
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [25] Individual Differences in Categorization Gradience As Predicted by Online Processing of Phonetic Cues During Spoken Word Recognition: Evidence From Eye Movements
    Ou, Jinghua
    Yu, Alan C. L.
    Xiang, Ming
    COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2021, 45 (03)
  • [26] Using Fuzzy Logic to Involve Individual Differences for Predicting Cybersickness during VR Navigation
    Wang, Yuyang
    Chardonnet, Jean-Remy
    Merienne, Frederic
    Ovtcharova, Jivka
    2021 IEEE VIRTUAL REALITY AND 3D USER INTERFACES (VR), 2021, : 373 - 381
  • [27] DIFFERENCES IN OERP ACTIVITY DURING RETRIEVAL USING ODORS VERSUS RETRIEVAL USING ODOR LABELS AS CUES IN AN ODOR MEMORY TASK
    Graves, L.
    Cervantez, M.
    Green, A.
    Morgan, C.
    Murphy, C.
    GERONTOLOGIST, 2012, 52 : 550 - 550
  • [28] Individual Differences in Prefrontal Cortex Activity during Perception of Bitter Taste Using fNIRS Methodology
    Bembich, Stefano
    Lanzara, Carmela
    Clarici, Andrea
    Demarini, Sergio
    Tepper, Beverly J.
    Gasparini, Paolo
    Grasso, Domenico L.
    CHEMICAL SENSES, 2010, 35 (09) : 801 - 812
  • [29] Is birth weight modified during pregnancy? Using sibling differences to understand the impact of blood glucose, obesity, and maternal weight gain in gestational diabetes
    Hutcheon, Jennifer A.
    Platt, Robert W.
    Meltzer, Sara J.
    Egeland, Grace M.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2006, 195 (02) : 488 - 494
  • [30] Using Procleix® West Nile Virus NAT for testing 24,312 individual donor samples:: Lessons learned during 2003
    Martinez, F
    Sazama, K
    TRANSFUSION, 2004, 44 (09) : 137A - 138A