CMIP5 and CMIP6: contrasting perspectives on Nigeria's climate transformation

被引:0
|
作者
Tanimu, Bashir [1 ,2 ]
Hamed, Mohammed Magdy [3 ]
Bello, Al-Amin Danladi [1 ]
Abdullahi, Sule Argungu [1 ]
Ajibike, Morufu A. [1 ]
Yaseen, Zaher Mundher [4 ]
Alasow, Ahmed Abdiaziz [5 ,8 ]
Muhammad, Mohd Khairul Idlan bin [2 ]
Shahid, Shamsuddin [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Ahmadu Bello Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm Engn, Zaria, Nigeria
[2] Univ Teknol Malaysia UTM, Fac Civil Engn, Dept Water & Environm Engn, Skudia 81310, Johor, Malaysia
[3] Arab Acad Sci Technol & Maritime Transport AASTMT, Coll Engn & Technol, Construct & Bldg Engn Dept, B 2401 Smart Village, Giza 12577, Egypt
[4] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Civil & Environm Engn Dept, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia
[5] Jamhuriya Univ Sci & Technol JUST, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Mogadishu, Somalia
[6] Natl Ctr Meteorol, Reg Climate Change Ctr, POB 1358,Al Warood Dist,Prince Majid Rd, Jeddah 21431, Saudi Arabia
[7] Al Ayen Univ, Sci Res Ctr, Environm & Atmospher Sci Res Grp, Thi Qar 64001, Nasiriyah, Iraq
[8] Univ Putra Malaysia UPM, Fac Environm Forestry & Environm, Dept Environm Sci, Selangor 43400, Malaysia
关键词
MODEL EVALUATION; PRECIPITATION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT; ENSEMBLE; EXTREMES; GCMS;
D O I
10.1007/s00704-024-05272-3
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
This study extensively compares CMIP5 and CMIP6 models in simulating historical and projected annual and seasonal climate variability over Nigeria. Thirteen Global Climate Models (GCMs) from both CMIPs were considered and compared for two future projections of the radiative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and 8.5) and that of shared socioeconomic pathways (SSP2-4.5 and 5-8.5). This study delves deeper into climate modeling than any previous CMIP model performance comparison by analyzing the CMIP's mean and median multimodel ensemble (MME), projection uncertainties, and spatial climate variability. The results indicated that CMIP6 models and their MMEs exhibited higher Kling-Gupta Efficiency (KGE) than CMIP5 models for rainfall, maximum temperature (Tmax), and minimum temperature (Tmin), indicating an improvement in CMIP6 models compared to their predecessors. CMIP6 models cluster closely, reflecting consensus, while CMIP5 models widely disperse, leading to bias and high-centered root-mean-square difference values, indicating inconsistency. The spatial pattern of CMIP6 MME simulation closely aligns with reference data, showing improved rainfall and temperature estimate reliability. RCP-4.5 and RCP-8.5 projected a Tmax rise of 1.8 degrees C and 4.12 degrees C, while SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5 projected a rise of 3.2 degrees C and 1.12 degrees C by 2100. Tmin rises are projected 2.1 degrees C and 3.9 degrees C for RCP-4.5 and RCP-8.5, and 2.3 degrees C and 3.8 degrees C for SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5. In the case of rainfall, CMIP5 MME projected a decrease in rainfall by -10% and - 12% for RCP-4.5 and RCP-8.5, while CMIP6 MME projected an increase by 16% and 23% for SSP2-4.5 and SSP5-8.5.
引用
收藏
页数:23
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Climate change impacts on hydrology and water resources in East Africa considering CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6
    Onyutha, Charles
    FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE, 2024, 6
  • [32] Intermodel Spread in the Pattern Effect and Its Contribution to Climate Sensitivity in CMIP5 and CMIP6 Models
    Dong, Yue
    Armour, Kyle C.
    Zelinka, Mark D.
    Proistosescu, Cristian
    Battisti, David S.
    Zhou, Chen
    Andrews, Timothy
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2020, 33 (18) : 7755 - 7775
  • [33] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Shiru, Mohammed Sanusi
    Chung, Eun-Sung
    Shahid, Shamsuddin
    Wang, Xiao-jun
    THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2022, 147 (1-2) : 535 - 548
  • [34] Comparison of precipitation projections of CMIP5 and CMIP6 global climate models over Yulin, China
    Mohammed Sanusi Shiru
    Eun-Sung Chung
    Shamsuddin Shahid
    Xiao-jun Wang
    Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 2022, 147 : 535 - 548
  • [35] The Response of the Northern Hemisphere Storm Tracks and Jet Streams to Climate Change in the CMIP3, CMIP5, and CMIP6 Climate Models
    Harvey, B. J.
    Cook, P.
    Shaffrey, L. C.
    Schiemann, R.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2020, 125 (23)
  • [36] Climate hazard indices projections based on CORDEX-CORE, CMIP5 and CMIP6 ensemble
    Coppola, Erika
    Raffaele, Francesca
    Giorgi, Filippo
    Giuliani, Graziano
    Xuejie, Gao
    Ciarlo, James M.
    Sines, Taleena Rae
    Torres-Alavez, Jose Abraham
    Das, Sushant
    di Sante, Fabio
    Pichelli, Emanuela
    Glazer, Russell
    Mueller, Sebastian Karl
    Abba Omar, Sabina
    Ashfaq, Moetasim
    Bukovsky, Melissa
    Im, E. -S.
    Jacob, Daniela
    Teichmann, Claas
    Remedio, Armelle
    Remke, Thomas
    Kriegsmann, Arne
    Bulow, Katharina
    Weber, Torsten
    Buntemeyer, Lars
    Sieck, Kevin
    Rechid, Diana
    CLIMATE DYNAMICS, 2021, 57 (5-6) : 1293 - 1383
  • [37] Model uncertainties in climate change impacts on Sahel precipitation in ensembles of CMIP5 and CMIP6 simulations
    Paul-Arthur Monerie
    Caroline M. Wainwright
    Moussa Sidibe
    Akintomide Afolayan Akinsanola
    Climate Dynamics, 2020, 55 : 1385 - 1401
  • [38] Assessment of the Decadal Prediction Skill of Sahel Rainfall in CMIP5 and CMIP6
    He, Yujun
    Wang, Bin
    Liu, Juanjuan
    Wang, Yong
    Li, Lijuan
    Liu, Li
    Xu, Shiming
    Huang, Wenyu
    Lu, Hui
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2024, 37 (08) : 2471 - 2490
  • [39] Evaluating Diurnal Rainfall Signal Performance from CMIP5 to CMIP6
    Lee, Yu-Chi
    Wang, Yi-Chi
    JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2021, 34 (18) : 7607 - 7623
  • [40] Assessment of Sea Ice Extent in CMIP6 With Comparison to Observations and CMIP5
    Shu, Qi
    Wang, Qiang
    Song, Zhenya
    Qiao, Fangli
    Zhao, Jiechen
    Chu, Min
    Li, Xinfang
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 47 (09)