Thermoeconomic analysis of a geothermal power plant by comparison of different exergetic methods

被引:0
|
作者
Ozcan, Zekeriya [1 ]
Ekici, Ozgur [1 ]
机构
[1] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Ankara, Turkiye
来源
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY | 2025年 / 13卷 / 01期
关键词
Exergoeconomic analysis; GPP; LCOE; SPECO; ECT; Optimization; Plant configuration; ORGANIC RANKINE-CYCLE; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PARAMETERS; HEAT; ORC;
D O I
10.1186/s40517-025-00335-8
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Exergoeconomics is a vital complementation of thermodynamic performance analysis. In this study, a comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a binary geothermal power plant in southwestern Anatolia is conducted to determine improvement potentials in the plant configuration. By utilization of cost allocation rules of three different exergoeconomic methods (Moran, Specific Exergy Costing (SPECO), Exergy Cost Theory) plant is analyzed in terms of exergetic costs and possible optimization areas. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) estimated by 3 different methods vary within a 3.6% range, between 7.81 c$/kWh and 8.1 c$/kWh. It has also been determined that 51.5% of LCOE is constituted by waste/residual costs. Components especially including a thermal phase change or energy conversion, whose exergoeconomic factors below 0.5 warrant investment and optimization for performance improvement despite their higher individual exergetic efficiencies reported in previous studies. This phenomenon highlights the importance of considering exergetic efficiency and exergoeconomic factors together as plant design parameters. By using advanced materials or by optimizing the temperature gradient between the geothermal brine and the working fluid, heat transfer efficiency can be enhanced in heat exchanger devices. Turbines generally have mechanical losses which can be enhanced by optimizing blade design, reducing friction, and enhancing the thermodynamic cycle (i.e., use re-heat stages or improve steam conditions).
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Thermoeconomic analysis of seawater desalination methods in Bandar Abbas power plant
    Ghaedi, Hadi
    Abedini, Ehsan
    Ansari, Abdulhamid N. M.
    JOURNAL OF THE BRAZILIAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 44 (11)
  • [12] Exergetic comparison of two different cooling technologies for the power cycle of a thermal power plant
    Blanco-Marigorta, Ana M.
    Victoria Sanchez-Henriquez, M.
    Pena-Quintana, Juan A.
    ENERGY, 2011, 36 (04) : 1966 - 1972
  • [13] Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants
    Yari, Mortaza
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2010, 35 (01) : 112 - 121
  • [14] An energetic, exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of a gas/steam combined cycle cogeneration plant
    Colpan, CO
    Yesin, T
    Proceedings of ECOS 2005, Vols 1-3: SHAPING OUR FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2005, : 801 - 809
  • [15] Thermoeconomic modeling and artificial neural network optimization of Afyon geothermal power plant
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    Koyuncu, Ismail
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 163 : 1166 - 1181
  • [16] Thermoeconomic cost evaluation of hydrogen production driven by binary geothermal power plant
    Yilmaz, Ceyhun
    Kanoglu, Mehmet
    Abusoglu, Aysegul
    GEOTHERMICS, 2015, 57 : 18 - 25
  • [17] Thermoeconomic analysis of a power/water cogeneration plant
    Hamed, Osman A.
    Al-Washmi, Hamed A.
    Al-Otaibi, Holayil A.
    ENERGY, 2006, 31 (14) : 2699 - 2709
  • [18] Exergetic and thermoeconomic analysis of a 200-kW phosphoric acid fuel cell plant
    Kwak, HY
    Lee, HS
    Jung, JY
    Jeon, JS
    Park, DR
    FUEL, 2004, 83 (14-15) : 2087 - 2094
  • [19] Exergetic Analysis of a Solar Thermal Power Plant
    Wu, Jingqiu
    Zhu, Daofei
    Hua, Wang
    Zhu, Yong
    APPLIED ENERGY TECHNOLOGY, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 724-725 : 156 - +
  • [20] Thermoeconomic Analysis of Subcritical and Supercritical Isobutane Cycles for Geothermal Power Generation
    Arbula Blecich, Andrea
    Blecich, Paolo
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)