Impact of leadless pacemaker implantation site on cardiac synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation

被引:0
|
作者
Gao, Xiao-fei [1 ]
Zhu, Hong [2 ]
Zhang, Jia-sheng [1 ]
Pan, Xiao-hong [2 ]
Xu, Yi-Zhou [1 ]
机构
[1] Hangzhou First Peoples Hosp, Dept Cardiol, 261 Huansha Rd, Hangzhou 310000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Cardiol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
来源
EGYPTIAN HEART JOURNAL | 2025年 / 77卷 / 01期
关键词
Leadless pacemaker; Synchronization; Pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy; RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY; ATRIOVENTRICULAR-BLOCK; DYSSYNCHRONY; ACTIVATION; INDEXES; RHYTHM;
D O I
10.1186/s43044-024-00602-2
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background To investigate the optimization of leadless pacemaker placement and to assess its impact on heart synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation. Results A clinical trial was conducted involving 53 patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantation at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and Hangzhou First People's Hospital between March 2022 and February 2023. Implantation site localization was determined using the 18-segment method under RAO 30 degrees imaging. Intraoperative and 1-month post-operative echocardiography was performed to assess cardiac electromechanical synchronization and tricuspid regurgitation; parameters of interest included interventricular mechanical delay (IVMD), pre-ejection period of the aorta (L-PEI), and septal-to-posterior wall motion delay (SPWMD). Pacing thresholds, sensing, and impedance exhibited no significant differences between the 8/9 zone and other sites (P > 0.05). In contrast, the 8/9 zone group manifested a significant reduction in L-PEI (128.24 +/- 12.27 vs. 146.50 +/- 18.17 ms, P < 0.001), IVMD (17.92 +/- 8.47 vs. 28.56 +/- 15.16 ms, P < 0.001), and SPWMD (72.84 +/- 19.57 vs. 156.56 +/- 81.54 ms, P < 0.001), compared to the non-8/9 group. Post-pacing QRS duration showed no significant difference between the two groups (139.21 +/- 11.36 vs. 143.83 +/- 16.35 ms P = 0.310). Notably, for patients with atrial fibrillation, the 8/9 zone placement significantly reduced tricuspid regurgitation. During the 1-month follow-up, neither group reported major complications such as bleeding, cardiac tamponade, pacemaker detachment, or malignant arrhythmias. Conclusion Implantation of the leadless pacemaker in the right ventricular 8/9 zone provides superior electromechanical synchronization compared to other sites.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Leadless pacemaker implantation following tricuspid interventions: multicenter collaboration of feasibility and safety
    Gul, Enes Elvin
    Baudinaud, Pierre
    Waldmann, Victor
    Sabbag, Avi
    Jubeh, Yousef
    Clementy, Nicholas
    Bisson, Arnaud
    Ollitraut, Pierre
    Conti, Sergio
    Carabelli, Adrian
    Dogan, Zeki
    JOURNAL OF INTERVENTIONAL CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 67 (5) : 1241 - 1246
  • [22] Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in a Patient With Previous Aortic, Mitral, and Tricuspid Valve Interventions
    Ollitrault, Pierre
    JOURNAL OF INVASIVE CARDIOLOGY, 2021, 33 (10): : E841 - E841
  • [23] The learning curve associated with the implantation of the nanostim leadless cardiac pacemaker
    Beurskens, N. E. G.
    Tjong, F. V. Y.
    Neuzil, P.
    Defaye, P.
    Delnoy, P. P.
    Ip, J.
    Garcia Guerrero, J. J.
    Rashtian, M.
    Banker, R.
    Reddy, V.
    Exner, D.
    Sperzel, J.
    Knops, R.
    EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2018, 39 : 828 - 829
  • [24] FLUROLESS IMPLANTATION OF A LEADLESS PACEMAKER
    Erickson, Marc D.
    O'Dell, Kimberly R.
    Platzer, Patrick
    Desai, Anjali
    Manyam, Harish
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2024, 83 (13) : 3705 - 3705
  • [25] A Leadless Cardiac Pacemaker
    Xiao, Yichao
    Zhou, Shenghua
    Liu, Qiming
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 374 (06): : 593 - 594
  • [26] Successful implantation of leadless pacemaker in a patient with giant right atrium and tricuspid valve stenosis
    Xiong, Qinmei
    Hu, Jinzhu
    Zhou, Qiongqiong
    Huang, Lin
    Yu, Jianhua
    Li, Juxiang
    Chen, Qi
    Hong, Kui
    ANNALS OF NONINVASIVE ELECTROCARDIOLOGY, 2022, 27 (02)
  • [27] Prevalence, predictors, and prognosis of tricuspid regurgitation following permanent pacemaker implantation
    Seo, Jiwon
    Kim, Dae-Young
    Cho, Iksung
    Hong, Geu-Ru
    Ha, Jong-Won
    Shim, Chi Young
    PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (06):
  • [28] Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve Regurgitation Associated With Pacemaker or Defibrillator Lead Implantation
    Eleid, Mackram F.
    Blauwet, Lori A.
    Cha, Yong-Mei
    Connolly, Heidi M.
    Brady, Peter A.
    Dearani, Joseph A.
    Espinosa, Raul E.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 59 (09) : 813 - 818
  • [29] Leadless Pacemaker Implantation in the Presence of the Bioprosthetic Tricuspid Valve: Case Presentation and Literature Review
    Mohammadi, Mahsa
    Iranian, Mohammadreza
    Saedi, Sedigheh
    Toloueitabar, Yaser
    Fazelifar, Amirfarjam
    Haghjoo, Majid
    CLINICAL CASE REPORTS, 2025, 13 (01):
  • [30] Impact of Intravenous Heparin Bolus on Outcomes of Leadless Pacemaker Implantation
    Huang, Jingwen
    Bhatia, Neal
    Lloyd, Michael S.
    Westerman, Stacy
    Shah, Anand
    Leal, Miguel A.
    Delurgio, David B.
    Patel, Anshul
    Tompkins, Christine
    Leon, Angel R.
    CIRCULATION, 2023, 148