Approaches to engaging faith communities in public health efforts regarding vaccination, genetics, and colorectal cancer: a systematic review

被引:0
|
作者
Iltis, Ana S. [1 ]
Baker, Lauren L. [2 ]
Baldwin, Kari [2 ]
Cruz, Lucas [3 ]
Yaeger, Lauren H. [4 ]
Dubois, James M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Ctr Bioeth Hlth & Soc, 1834 Wake Forest Rd, Winston Salem, NC 27106 USA
[2] Washington Univ, Bioeth Res Ctr, Dept Med, Sch Med, 425 S Euclid Ave,8 Barnard, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[3] Washington Univ, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Becker Med Lib, 660 S Euclid Ave,Box 8132, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
Cancer; Colorectal cancer; Faith; Genetics; Genomics; Public health; Religion; Spirituality; Vaccination; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; UPDATED GUIDANCE; HIV PREVENTION; PARTNERSHIPS; ORGANIZATIONS; INTERVENTIONS; STRATEGIES; PROGRAMS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12889-025-21903-4
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
BackgroundPublic health professionals regularly engage faith communities to improve public health. This systematic review characterizes approaches that public health professionals have used to engage faith communities and evaluates them using the Theory of Planned Behavior. It examines engagement regarding vaccination and genetic and genomic healthcare, which have generated significant controversy within religious groups and, for comparison, colorectal cancer screening, which has not.MethodsThis systematic review followed PRISMA reporting guidelines. We searched 8 online databases (e.g., Medline, Embase, Scopus). Publications in English that reported engaging a faith community on genetics, vaccination, or colorectal cancer screening were included. We screened 13,117 articles and extracted information from 121 articles reporting on 96 distinct projects.ResultsThis review includes 121 articles reporting on 96 distinct projects. 67% of projects took place in the United States. Of these, 73% reported engaging racial or ethnic minorities; only 5% of projects reported engaging primarily White, Christian communities. Only 35% of projects reported addressing religious values that might inform attitudes and beliefs. The majority of publications (n = 74; 77.1%) reported primarily engaging faith communities for reasons unrelated to faith.ConclusionBecause the Theory of Planned Behavior is widely used and our focus was on faith communities, we expected to see engagement with faith values and beliefs that might inform attitudes toward behaviors or social pressures community members perceive. Fewer than half of the projects reported addressing values or attitudes. There are missed opportunities to engage faith communities on religiously controversial public health initiatives in ways that are most likely to affect health behaviors. Evaluation of the outcomes of such engagement is needed.Trial registrationThe protocol is registered on Open Science Framework (OSF) at osf.io/r2c9n.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A systematic mixed studies review of health behaviour change interventions in colorectal cancer survivors
    Sweeney-Magee, Molly
    Moustaqim-Barrette, Amina
    Gotay, Carolyn
    Dummer, Trevor
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2020, 76 (08) : 1936 - 1948
  • [42] Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
    Annamaria Guglielmo
    Nicoletta Staropoli
    Monica Giancotti
    Marianna Mauro
    Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 16
  • [43] Promoting Sexual Health in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Survivors: Results from a Systematic Review
    Rocha, Helia B.
    Carneiro, Bruna C.
    Vasconcelos, Priscila A.
    Pereira, Raquel
    Quinta-Gomes, Ana Luisa
    Nobre, Pedro J.
    HEALTHCARE, 2024, 12 (02)
  • [44] Personalized medicine in colorectal cancer diagnosis and treatment: a systematic review of health economic evaluations
    Guglielmo, Annamaria
    Staropoli, Nicoletta
    Giancotti, Monica
    Mauro, Marianna
    COST EFFECTIVENESS AND RESOURCE ALLOCATION, 2018, 16
  • [45] WHERE ARE WE TODAY? EFFORTS TO UNDERSTAND STRATEGIES AND BARRIERS TO PHYSICIAN ISSUANCE OF A RECOMMENDATION FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW
    Rich, Thereasa
    Raymond, Victoria
    Lang, Kathryn
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2020, 158 (06) : S918 - S918
  • [46] The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control
    Sarah Conderino
    Stefanie Bendik
    Thomas B. Richards
    Claudia Pulgarin
    Pui Ying Chan
    Julie Townsend
    Sungwoo Lim
    Timothy R. Roberts
    Lorna E. Thorpe
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 22
  • [47] The use of electronic health records to inform cancer surveillance efforts: a scoping review and test of indicators for public health surveillance of cancer prevention and control
    Conderino, Sarah
    Bendik, Stefanie
    Richards, Thomas B.
    Pulgarin, Claudia
    Chan, Pui Ying
    Townsend, Julie
    Lim, Sungwoo
    Roberts, Timothy R.
    Thorpe, Lorna E.
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] Correspondence regarding 'Delay to elective colorectal cancer surgery and implications for survival: A systematic review and meta-analysis'
    Onerup, Aron
    Rydbeck, Daniel
    Bock, David
    Haglind, Eva
    Angenete, Eva
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2021, 23 (12) : 3277 - 3278
  • [49] State of the Art in Adoption of Contact Tracing Apps and Recommendations Regarding Privacy Protection and Public Health: Systematic Review
    Kolasa, Katarzyna
    Mazzi, Francesca
    Leszczuk-Czubkowska, Ewa
    Zrubka, Zsombor
    Pentek, Marta
    JMIR MHEALTH AND UHEALTH, 2021, 9 (06):
  • [50] A Rapid Systematic Review of Public Responses to Health Messages Encouraging Vaccination against Infectious Diseases in a Pandemic or Epidemic
    Lawes-Wickwar, Sadie
    Ghio, Daniela
    Tang, Mei Yee
    Keyworth, Chris
    Stanescu, Sabina
    Westbrook, Juliette
    Jenkinson, Elizabeth
    Kassianos, Angelos P.
    Scanlan, Daniel
    Garnett, Natalie
    Laidlaw, Lynn
    Howlett, Neil
    Carr, Natalie
    Stanulewicz, Natalia
    Guest, Ella
    Watson, Daniella
    Sutherland, Lisa
    Byrne-Davis, Lucie
    Chater, Angel
    Hart, Jo
    Armitage, Christopher J.
    Shorter, Gillian W.
    Swanson, Vivien
    Epton, Tracy
    VACCINES, 2021, 9 (02) : 1 - 26