The use of artificial intelligence based chat bots in ophthalmology triage

被引:0
|
作者
David, Daniel [1 ,2 ]
Zloto, Ofira [1 ,2 ]
Katz, Gabriel [1 ,2 ]
Huna-Baron, Ruth [1 ,2 ]
Vishnevskia-Dai, Vicktoria [1 ,2 ]
Armarnik, Sharon [1 ,2 ]
Zauberman, Noa Avni [1 ,2 ]
Barnir, Elinor Megiddo [1 ,2 ]
Singer, Reut [1 ,2 ]
Hostovsky, Avner [1 ,2 ]
Klang, Eyal [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Tel Aviv Univ, Fac Med, Tel Aviv, Israel
[2] Sheba Med Ctr, Goldschleger Eye Inst, Tel Hashomer, Israel
[3] Icahn Sch Med Mt Sinai, Div Data Driven & Digital Med D3M, New York, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1038/s41433-024-03488-1
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate AI-based chat bots ability to accurately answer common patient's questions in the field of ophthalmology. Methods: An experienced ophthalmologist curated a set of 20 representative questions and responses were sought from two AI generative models: OpenAI's ChatGPT and Google's Bard (Gemini Pro). Eight expert ophthalmologists from different sub-specialties assessed each response, blinded to the source, and ranked them by three metrics-accuracy, comprehensiveness, and clarity, on a 1-5 scale. Results: For accuracy, ChatGPT scored a median of 4.0, whereas Bard scored a median of 3.0. In terms of comprehensiveness, ChatGPT achieved a median score of 4.5, compared to Bard which scored a median of 3.0. Regarding clarity, ChatGPT maintained a higher score with a median of 5.0, compared to Bard's median score of 4.0. All comparisons were statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: AI-based chat bots can provide relatively accurate and clear responses for addressing common ophthalmological inquiries. ChatGPT surpassed Bard in all measured metrics. While these AI models exhibit promise, further research is indicated to improve their performance and allow them to be used as a reliable medical tool.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 789
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Understanding the advent of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Ahuja, Abhimanyu S.
    Halperin, Lawrence S.
    JOURNAL OF CURRENT OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 31 (02): : 115 - 117
  • [32] Artificial intelligence and deep learning in ophthalmology
    Ting, Daniel Shu Wei
    Pasquale, Louis R.
    Peng, Lily
    Campbell, John Peter
    Lee, Aaron Y.
    Raman, Rajiv
    Tan, Gavin Siew Wei
    Schmetterer, Leopold
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Wong, Tien Yin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 103 (02) : 167 - 175
  • [33] The current state of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Kapoor, Rahul
    Walters, Stephen P.
    Al-Aswad, Lama A.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 64 (02) : 233 - 240
  • [34] The eye in AI: artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Keel, Stuart
    van Wijngaarden, Peter
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2019, 47 (01): : 5 - 6
  • [35] Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology: A multidisciplinary approach
    Ahuja, Abhimanyu S.
    Wagner, Isabella, V
    Dorairaj, Syril
    Checo, Leticia
    Ten Hulzen, Richard
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2022, 11 (04)
  • [36] Artificial intelligence: the unstoppable revolution in ophthalmology
    Benet, David
    Pellicer-Valero, Oscar J.
    SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 67 (01) : 252 - 270
  • [37] Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology - Machines think!
    Honavar, Santosh G.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2022, 70 (04) : 1075 - 1079
  • [38] Assistive applications of artificial intelligence in ophthalmology
    Hubbard, Donald C.
    Cox, Parker
    Redd, Travis K.
    CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2023, 34 (03) : 261 - 266
  • [39] Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology: Advantages and Limits
    Costin, Hariton-Nicolae
    Fira, Monica
    Goras, Liviu
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2025, 15 (04):
  • [40] Economic Evaluations of Artificial Intelligence in Ophthalmology
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Chantra, Somporn
    Seresirikachorn, Kasem
    Ruamviboonsuk, Varis
    Sangroongruangsri, Sermsiri
    ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 10 (03): : 307 - 316