Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score

被引:0
|
作者
Palmer, Jacob [1 ]
Winata, Leon [1 ]
Seale, Melanie [1 ]
Sutherland, Tom [1 ]
Page, Mark [1 ]
机构
[1] St Vincents Hosp Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
关键词
MRI; Prostate; Enema; Image quality; Artifact;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-024-04617-w
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose Our aim was to determine whether the administration of a micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI is associated with a reduction in rectal gas, gas related artifacts and an improvement in image quality and PI-QUAL score. Method This retrospective analysis enrolled 171 patients who underwent multiparametric 3T prostate MRI at our institution between January 2021 and September 2022. 86 patients received a micro-enema, and a further 85 patients did not. Two fellowship trained abdominal radiologists were blinded and independently reviewed each prostate MRI, recording scores on a dedicated scoring sheet. The quality of T2 weighted (T2W), diffusion weighted (DWI), and dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) images were assessed according to standardised scales supported in the literature. In addition, gas related artifacts and rectal gas level were examined. An independent-samples Mann-Whitney U and t-test were performed, comparing both the median and mean score between micro-enema and no micro-enema groups for each reader. Spearman's correlation was used to determine the strength of relationship between variables. A quadratic weighted Cohen's Kappa and percent agreement were used to assess inter-observer agreement. Results Image quality was improved in those who received the micro-enema compared to those who did not according to the visual grading scale on the DWI sequence for both readers (reader 1: median 4 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 4.27 vs. 3.92, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 5 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 4.74 vs. 4.14, p < 0.001). PI-QUAL score was significantly improved in the micro-enema group for reader 2 only (reader 1: median 4 vs. 4, p = 0.25, mean 3.99 vs. 4.08, p = 0.21; reader 2: median 5 vs. 5, p = 0.01, mean 4.95 vs. 4.78, p = 0.01). Visual grading score for both the T2W and DCE images was not significantly different. Rectal gas level was lower in patients who received the micro-enema for both readers (reader 1: median 2 vs. 4, p < 0.001, mean 2.12 vs. 3.60, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001, mean 1.37 vs. 2.48, p < 0.001), correlating with a lower score for gas-related artifacts (reader 1: median 1 vs. 2, p < 0.001, mean 1.50 vs. 1.92, p < 0.001; reader 2: median 1 vs. 1, p < 0.001, mean 1.16 vs. 1.71, p < 0.001) in this group. Correlation between rectal gas level and gas-related artifacts on DWI regardless of whether a micro-enema was given was strong (rs = 0.71, p < 0.001). Correlation was moderate to strong between rectal gas level and image quality on DWI (rs = -0.63, p < 0.001). There was only 1 (1.2%) borderline diagnostic or non-diagnostic DWI sequence in those who received the micro-enema, compared to 9 (10.6%) in those who did not (p = 0.009). Interobserver agreement was moderate for image quality on DWI, gas related artifacts and rectal gas level (weighted kappa values of 0.52, 0.49 and 0.53 respectively). Conclusions The administration of a micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI is associated with a significant improvement in image quality on the DWI sequence compared to no bowel preparation. This is mediated through a reduction in rectal gas and gas related artifacts. Improvements in PI-QUAL score was mixed between readers.
引用
收藏
页码:1662 / 1671
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [31] Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality?
    Verena Plodeck
    Christoph Georg Radosa
    Hans-Martin Hübner
    Christian Baldus
    Angelika Borkowetz
    Christian Thomas
    Jens-Peter Kühn
    Michael Laniado
    Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann
    Ivan Platzek
    Abdominal Radiology, 2020, 45 : 4244 - 4251
  • [32] Optimization of non-endorectal prostate MR image quality using PI-QUAL: A multidisciplinary team approach
    Robertson, Scott H.
    Owenby, Erica
    Beasley, Christopher
    Wall, Lisa
    Gray, Bradley
    Boru, Issack
    Kalisz, Kevin R.
    Kruse, Danielle E.
    Marin, Daniele
    Thomas, Sarah P.
    Macdonald, Erin B.
    Purysko, Andrei S.
    Gupta, Rajan T.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [33] Prostate MR image quality of apparent diffusion coefficient maps versus fractional intracellular volume maps from VERDICT MRI using the PI-QUAL score and a dedicated Likert scale for artefacts
    Singh, Saurabh
    Giganti, Francesco
    Dickinson, Louise
    Rogers, Harriet
    Kanber, Baris
    Clemente, Joey
    Pye, Hayley
    Heavey, Susan
    Stopka-Farooqui, Urszula
    Johnston, Edward W.
    Moore, Caroline M.
    Freeman, Alex
    Whitaker, Hayley C.
    Alexander, Daniel C.
    Panagiotaki, Eleftheria
    Punwani, Shonit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 168
  • [34] Re: Rectal Gas-Induced Susceptibility Artefacts on Prostate Diffusion-Weighted MRI with EPI Read-out at 3.0 T: Does a Preparatory Micro-Enema Improve Image Quality? Editorial Comment
    Plodeck, V
    Radosa, C. G.
    Huebner, H. M.
    Baldus, C.
    Borkowetz, A.
    Thomas, C.
    Kuehn, J. P.
    Laniado, M.
    Hoffmann, R. T.
    Platzek, I
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2022, 207 (03): : 715 - 715
  • [35] Gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the rectum at 1.5 T - Effect of applying a micro-enema to improve image quality
    van Griethuysen, Joost J. M.
    Bus, Elyse M.
    Hauptmann, Michael
    Lahaye, Max J.
    Maas, Monique
    ter Beek, Leon C.
    Beets, Geerard L.
    Bakers, Frans C. H.
    Beets-Tan, Regina G. H.
    Lambregts, Doenja M. J.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2018, 99 : 131 - 137
  • [36] Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality? (vol 45, pg 4244, 2020)
    Plodeck, Verena
    Radosa, Christoph Georg
    Hubner, Hans-Martin
    Baldus, Christian
    Borkowetz, Angelika
    Thomas, Christian
    Kuhn, Jens-Peter
    Laniado, Michael
    Hoffmann, Ralf-Thorsten
    Platzek, Ivan
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2021, 46 (11) : 5450 - 5450
  • [37] Correction to: Rectal gas‑induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion‑weighted MRI with epi read‑out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro‑enema improve image quality?
    Verena Plodeck
    Christoph Georg Radosa
    Hans‑Martin Hubner
    Christian Baldus
    Angelika Borkowetz
    Christian Thomas
    Jens‑Peter Kuhn
    Michael Laniado
    Ralf‑Thorsten Hoffmann
    Ivan Platzek
    Abdominal Radiology, 2021, 46 : 5450 - 5450
  • [38] 3.0 T prostate MRI: Visual assessment of 2D and 3D T2-weighted imaging sequences using PI-QUAL score
    Brillat-Savarin, Nina
    Wu, Carine
    Aupin, Laurene
    Thoumin, Camille
    Hamzaoui, Dimitri
    Renard-Penna, Raphaele
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [39] Image quality comparison of 1.5T and 3T prostate MRIs of the same post-hip arthroplasty patients: multi-rater assessments including PI-QUAL version 2
    Nakai, Hirotsugu
    Takahashi, Naoki
    Sugi, Mark D.
    Wellnitz, Clinton V.
    Thompson, Cole P.
    Kawashima, Akira
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (11) : 3913 - 3924