Do participation rates vary with participation payments in laboratory experiments?

被引:0
|
作者
Zhong, Huizhen [1 ,2 ]
Deck, Cary [3 ,4 ]
Henderson, Daniel J. [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] South China Agr Univ, Coll Econ & Management, Guangzhou 510642, Peoples R China
[2] Shaoguan Univ, Coll Business, Shaoguan 512005, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Alabama, Dept Econ Finance & Legal Studies, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[4] Chapman Univ, Econ Sci Inst, Orange, CA 92866 USA
[5] Inst Study Lab IZA, Bonn, Germany
关键词
Participation payment; Selection bias; Treatment effect; Laboratory experiments; C91; D81; CHARITABLE CONTRIBUTIONS; COGNITIVE LOAD; SELECTION; REBATE; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s10683-024-09840-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper reports a series of experiments designed to evaluate how the advertised participation payment impacts participation rates in laboratory experiments. Our initial goal was to generate variation in the participation rate as a means to control for selection bias when evaluating treatment effects in common laboratory experiments. Initially, we varied the advertised participation payment to 1734 people from $5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$5$$\end{document} to $15\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$15$$\end{document} using standard email recruitment procedures, but found no statistical evidence this impacted the participation rate. A second study increased the advertised payment up to $100\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$100$$\end{document}. Here, we find marginally significant statistical evidence that the advertised participation payment affects the participation rate when payments are large. To combat skepticism of our results, we also conducted a third study in which verbal offers were made. Here, we found no statistically significant increase in participation rates when the participation payment increased from $5\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$5$$\end{document} to $10\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$10$$\end{document}. Finally, we conducted an experiment similar to the first one at a separate university. We found no statistically significant increase in participation rates when the participation payment increased from $7\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$7$$\end{document} to $15\documentclass[12pt]{minimal} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{wasysym} \usepackage{amsfonts} \usepackage{amssymb} \usepackage{amsbsy} \usepackage{mathrsfs} \usepackage{upgreek} \setlength{\oddsidemargin}{-69pt} \begin{document}$$\$15$$\end{document}. The combined results from our four experiments suggest moderate variation in the advertised participation payment from standard levels has little impact on participation rates in typical laboratory experiments. Rather, generating useful variation in participation rates likely requires much larger participation payments and/or larger potential subject pools than are common in laboratory experiments.
引用
收藏
页码:1140 / 1157
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Do patient consent procedures affect participation rates in health services research?
    Nelson, K
    Garcia, RE
    Brown, J
    Mangione, CM
    Louis, TA
    Keeler, E
    Cretin, S
    MEDICAL CARE, 2002, 40 (04) : 283 - 288
  • [32] Challenges and barriers to WIC participation vary by participation status and language: Findings from focus groups in Missouri
    Arteaga, Irma A.
    Chavez, Fiorella L. Carlos
    Segovia, Michelle S.
    Nayga Jr, Rodolfo M.
    APPETITE, 2025, 206
  • [33] Invitation Timing and Participation Rates in Online Panels: Findings From Two Survey Experiments
    Lindgren, Elina
    Markstedt, Elias
    Martinsson, Johan
    Andreasson, Maria
    SOCIAL SCIENCE COMPUTER REVIEW, 2020, 38 (02) : 225 - 244
  • [34] WHEN DO SCIENTISTS PREFER TO VARY THEIR EXPERIMENTS
    COLLINS, HM
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1984, 15 (02): : 169 - 174
  • [35] Indian participation in NuSTAR experiments at FAIR
    Pillay, R. G.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2011, 100 (05): : 696 - 700
  • [36] Advances in remote participation for fusion experiments
    Schissel, DP
    Farthing, JW
    Schmidt, V
    FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2005, 74 (1-4) : 803 - 808
  • [37] PARTICIPATION BY UNIVERSITY GROUPS IN LEP EXPERIMENTS
    MULVEY, JH
    PHYSICA SCRIPTA, 1981, 23 (04): : 522 - 525
  • [38] The Demonstration Disposition Program: Experiments in participation
    Georgopulos, D
    PDC 98: PROCEEDINGS OF THE PARTICIPATORY DESIGN CONFERENCE, 1998, : 75 - 81
  • [39] WHY DO SCIENTISTS PREFER TO VARY THEIR EXPERIMENTS
    FRANKLIN, A
    HOWSON, C
    STUDIES IN HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1984, 15 (01): : 51 - 62
  • [40] The paradox of voter participation? A laboratory study
    Levine, David K.
    Palfrey, Thomas R.
    AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2007, 101 (01) : 143 - 158