Agreement of intraocular pressure measurement by scleral Schiotz and Goldmann applanation tonometer

被引:0
|
作者
Shaikh, Zeba Muzammil [1 ]
Rajalakshmi, A. R. [1 ]
Nagarajan, Swathi [1 ]
Lokeshmaran, A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Ophthalmol, Pondicherry, India
[2] Deemed Be Univ, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth SBV, Mahatma Gandhi Med Coll & Res Inst, Dept Community Med, Pondicherry, India
来源
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Corneal IOP; Intraocular pressure estimation; Ocular rigidity; Predictive formula for IOP; Schiotz tonometer; Scleral biomechanics; Scleral IOP; CORNEAL; PNEUMATONOMETRY; THICKNESS;
D O I
10.1038/s41598-024-79403-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Aim & background : Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured through the sclera has some advantages over IOP measured through cornea. This study aimed to determine the agreement between IOP as estimated by scleral Schiotz (SS) tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT). Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study, IOP was measured by GAT on the cornea and Schiotz tonometer on the temporal sclera. Axial length and central corneal thickness (CCT) were noted. IOP was then estimated from SS IOP as eGAT using a predictive formula. Agreement of IOP corrected for CCT (cGAT) with eGAT and SS IOP were assessed. The effects of age, axial length, refraction, CCT, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity on measured IOP were also assessed. Results: The study included 155 patients with a mean age of 54.27 +/- 10.02 years. Mean IOP measured by GAT and scleral Schiotz were 16.58 +/- 2.76 mm Hg and 16.10 +/- 2.96 mm Hg, respectively. The mean IOP by cGAT and eGAT were 16.70 +/- 2.80 mm Hg and 17.07 +/- 3.10 mm Hg, respectively. Both eGAT & SS IOP had good agreement with cGAT on the Bland-Altmann plot (p = 0.96 & 0.51, respectively). Further, SS IOP showed good agreement even with GAT IOP (p = 0.78). Age, axial length, refraction, central corneal thickness, gender, and ocular and systemic comorbidity did not show significant correlation with IOP measurement. Conclusion: Estimated GAT IOP showed good agreement with measured GAT values. SS IOP also agreed well with GAT IOP. Clinical significance IOP measurement on the sclera using Schiotz can be used as an alternative to GAT.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] THE MINIFIED GOLDMANN APPLANATION TONOMETER
    ODONOGHUE, E
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1994, 78 (09) : 664 - 665
  • [42] Comparison of disposable Goldmann applanation tonometer and ICare ic100 to standards of care Goldmann nondisposable applanation tonometer and Tono-pen XL for Measuring Intraocular Pressure
    Wong, Benny
    Parikh, Deep
    Angert, Mallorie
    Gorski, Matthew
    Shih, Carolyn
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [43] Comparison of Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, Noncontact Tonometer, and TonoPen XL for Intraocular Pressure Measurement in Different Types of Glaucomatous, Ocular Hypertensive, and Normal Eyes
    Kim, Na Rae
    Kim, Chan Yun
    Kim, Hyunjoong
    Seong, Gong Je
    Lee, Eun Suk
    CURRENT EYE RESEARCH, 2011, 36 (04) : 295 - 300
  • [44] Does the surface property of a disposable applanation tonometer account for its underestimation of intraocular pressure when compared with the Goldmann tonometer?
    Osborne, Sarah F.
    Williams, Rachel
    Batterbury, Mark
    Wong, David
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2007, 245 (04) : 555 - 559
  • [45] The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer
    Mardelli, PG
    Piebenga, LW
    Whitacre, MM
    Siegmund, KD
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1997, 104 (06) : 945 - 948
  • [46] Agreement of Intraocular Pressure Measurement of Icare ic200 with Goldmann Applanation Tonometer in Adult Eyes with Normal Cornea (vol 4, pg 89, 2021)
    Rapuano, P. B.
    OPHTHALMOLOGY GLAUCOMA, 2021, 4 (02): : 234 - 234
  • [47] Does the surface property of a disposable applanation tonometer account for its underestimation of intraocular pressure when compared with the Goldmann tonometer?
    Sarah F. Osborne
    Rachel Williams
    Mark Batterbury
    David Wong
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2007, 245 : 555 - 559
  • [48] Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements with the tono-pen, goldmann applanation tonometer, and noncontact tonometer in nonglaucomatous pseudophakic children
    Yalcin, Sibel Oskan
    Kaplan, Aysin Tuba
    INTERNATIONAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2024, 44 (01)
  • [49] Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers
    Nakamura, Makoto
    Darhad, Urtogtah
    Tatsumi, Yasuko
    Fujioka, Miyuki
    Kusuhara, Azusa
    Maeda, Hidetaka
    Negi, Akira
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 142 (02) : 332 - 334
  • [50] Comparative study of recording intraocular pressure in adults by three different tonometers Goldmann applanation tonometer, noncontact tonometer, and tonopen
    Manade, Varsha V.
    Kotecha, Megha R.
    Chodvadiya, Surbhi A.
    Ta, Jhimli
    Paranjpe, Radhika R.
    JOURNAL OF THE EGYPTIAN OPHTHALMOLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2024, 117 (01) : 39 - 42