Neoadjuvant therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in HER2(-) locally advanced gastric cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Xu Gehan [1 ]
Liu Tianjiao [2 ]
Shen Jingyi [1 ]
Guan Quanlin [3 ]
机构
[1] The First Clinical Medical College of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
[2] Department of Medical Data, Beijing Yiyong Technology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China
[3] Department of Oncology Surgery, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu,
关键词
Gastric cancer; Neoadjuvant therapy; Immune checkpoint inhibitor; Chemotherapy; Propensity score matching;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R735.2 [胃肿瘤];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study aims to compare the efficacy between neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus chemotherapyvs. chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant tripletvs. doublet chemotherapeutic regimens in locally advanced gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer (LAGC).Methods: We included LAGC patients from 47 hospitals in China’s National Cancer Information Database (NCID) from January 2019 to December 2022. Using propensity score matching (PSM), we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy between neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapyvs. chemotherapy alone, and neoadjuvant tripletvs. doublet chemotherapeutic regimens. The primary study result was the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. The secondary study results were disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).Results: A total of 1205 LAGC patients were included. After PSM, the ICIs plus chemotherapy and the chemotherapy cohorts had 184 patients each, while the doublet and triplet chemotherapy cohorts had 246 patients each. The pCR rate (14.13%vs. 7.61%, χ2 = 4.039,P = 0.044), and the 2-year (77.60%vs. 61.02%, HR = 0.67, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.98,P = 0.048) and 3-year (70.55%vs. 61.02%, HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.32-0.93,P = 0.048) DFS rates in the ICIs plus chemotherapy cohort were improved compared to those in the chemotherapy cohort. No significant increase was observed in the OS rates at both 1 year and 2 years. The pCR rates, DFS rates at 1-3 years, and OS rates at 1-2 years did not differ significantly between the doublet and triplet cohorts, respectively. No differences were observed in postoperative complications between any of the group comparisons.Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ICIs plus chemotherapy improved the pCR rate and 2-3 years DFS rates of LAGC compared to chemotherapy alone, but whether short-term benefit could translate into long-term efficacy is unclear. The triplet regimen was not superior to the doublet regimen in terms of efficacy. The safety after surgery was similar between either ICIs plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy or the triplet and the doublet regimen.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Immune checkpoint inhibitors-associated periodontitis: A propensity score-matched retrospective cohort study
    Hsia, Yuanping
    Chiang, Cho Hsien
    Chiang, Cho Han
    Chiang, Cho Hung
    Peng, Cheng-Ming
    Shiah, Her-Shyong
    Ma, Kevin Sheng-Kai
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 41 (16)
  • [22] Long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in variant histology locally advanced colon cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
    Wang, Qiancheng
    Jin, Shiyang
    Wang, Zeshen
    Ju, Yuming
    Wang, Kuan
    CANCER BIOLOGY & THERAPY, 2025, 26 (01)
  • [23] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients undergoing colonic resection for locally advanced nonmetastatic colon cancer: A nationwide propensity score matched cohort study
    Laursen, Magnus
    Dohrn, Niclas
    Gogenur, Ismail
    Klein, Mads Falk
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2022, 24 (08) : 954 - 964
  • [24] Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study
    Yun Sun
    Yanan Fan
    Zhibin Ye
    Jiantao Dong
    Lifei Zhang
    Yanhui Peng
    Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -), 2023, 192 (3): : 1033 - 1040
  • [25] Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study
    Sun, Yun
    Fan, Yanan
    Ye, Zhibin
    Dong, Jiantao
    Zhang, Lifei
    Peng, Yanhui
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 192 (03) : 1033 - 1040
  • [26] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced T4 Colon Cancer: A Nationwide Propensity-Score Matched Cohort Analysis
    de Gooyer, Jan-Marie
    Verstegen, Marlies G.
    't Lam-Boer, Jorine
    Radema, Sandra A.
    Verhoeven, Rob H. A.
    Verhoef, Cornelis
    Schreinemakers, Jennifer M. J.
    de Wilt, Johannes H. W.
    DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2020, 37 (04) : 292 - 301
  • [27] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemo-radiation for patients with advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagus? A propensity score-matched study
    Celik, E.
    Bollschweiler, E.
    Semrau, R.
    Marnitz-Schulze, S.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2017, 193 : S42 - S42
  • [28] Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Versus Direct Surgery for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer With Serosal Invasion (cT4NxM0): A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis
    Xu, Wei
    Wang, Lingquan
    Yan, Chao
    He, Changyu
    Lu, Sheng
    Ni, Zhentian
    Hua, Zichen
    Zhu, Zhenglun
    Sah, Birendra Kumar
    Yang, Zhongyin
    Zheng, Yanan
    Feng, Runhua
    Li, Chen
    Yao, Xuexin
    Chen, Mingmin
    Liu, Wentao
    Yan, Min
    Zhu, Zhenggang
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [29] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis combined with SEER validation
    Wu, Jingjing
    Huang, Mingzhe
    Wu, Yuanhui
    Hong, Yisong
    Cai, Linbin
    He, Rongzhao
    Luo, Yanxin
    Wang, Puning
    Huang, Meijin
    Lin, Jinxin
    JOURNAL OF CANCER RESEARCH AND CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2023, 149 (11) : 8897 - 8912
  • [30] Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a propensity-score-matched analysis combined with SEER validation
    Jingjing Wu
    Mingzhe Huang
    Yuanhui Wu
    Yisong Hong
    Linbin Cai
    Rongzhao He
    Yanxin Luo
    Puning Wang
    Meijin Huang
    Jinxin Lin
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 2023, 149 : 8897 - 8912