Appropriate port selection for floating based offshore wind farms with MCDM Methods: The Case of Turkiye

被引:0
|
作者
Canat, Ayse Nuray [1 ]
Ozkan, Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Port selection for floating offshore wind turbine; Full Consistency Method; Best Worst Method; CRADIS; Combined Compromise Solution;
D O I
10.17341/gazimmfd.1398232
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order for offshore wind power plants, which are one of the renewable energy branches, to provide optimum service, to be low cost and highly beneficial, the installation, operation and maintenance stages should be carried out in a suitable port close to the power plant. In this port selection process, the criteria that ports should have differ according to the turbine structure to be installed. In the literature, there is no study on port location selection for floating wind turbines. In this study, the characteristics that ports should have for the life cycle of floating wind turbines at sea are obtained by examining the studies in the literature. For the selection of suitable ports, the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Best Worst Method (BWM), Common Weighting Method, Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution (CRADIS), Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and Borda Method were used to contribute to the decision making process. Comparative analyses with other MCDM (Multi-criteria decision making) methods have been carried out to select the appropriate port. In the study, container and Ro-Ro ports in Turkey were used since the port characteristics should be provided at least at minimum level. Samsunport in the Black Sea region was found to be the most suitable port for all three port types (terminal, service and response). The criterion of having a component production facility was found to be the most important criterion for floating based offshore power plant terminal port selection.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 652
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] A flexibility-based approach for the design and management of floating offshore wind farms
    Torres-Rincon, Samuel
    Bastidas-Arteaga, Emilio
    Sanchez-Silva, Mauricio
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 175 (175) : 910 - 925
  • [12] Comparison of multicriteria analysis techniques for decision making on floating offshore wind farms site selection
    Diaz, H.
    Loughney, S.
    Wang, J.
    Soares, C. Guedes
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2022, 248
  • [13] Selection of an Optimal Frequency for Offshore Wind Farms
    An, Byeonghyeon
    Che, Junsoo
    Kim, Taehun
    Park, Taesik
    ENERGIES, 2024, 17 (10)
  • [14] Fuzzy GIS-based MCDM solution for the optimal offshore wind site selection: The Gulf of Maine case
    Gil-Garcia, Isabel C.
    Ramos-Escudero, Adela
    Garcia-Cascales, M. S.
    Dagher, Habib
    Molina-Garcia, A.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 183 : 130 - 147
  • [15] Shared mooring systems for offshore floating wind farms: A review
    Xu H.
    Rui S.
    Shen K.
    Jiang L.
    Zhang H.
    Teng L.
    Energy Reviews, 2024, 3 (01):
  • [16] System reliability of floating offshore wind farms with multiline anchors
    Hallowell, Spencer T.
    Arwade, Sanjay R.
    Fontana, Casey M.
    DeGroot, Don J.
    Aubeny, Charles P.
    Diaz, Brian D.
    Myers, Andrew T.
    Landon, Melissa E.
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2018, 160 : 94 - 104
  • [17] RWE | Development of floating Offshore Wind Farms in South Korea
    不详
    WASSERWIRTSCHAFT, 2022, 112 (04) : 61 - 61
  • [18] Influence of Size on the Economic Feasibility of Floating Offshore Wind Farms
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Filgueira-Vizoso, Almudena
    Alvarez-Feal, Carlos
    Carral, Luis
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (12)
  • [19] Modelling the installation of next generation floating offshore wind farms
    McAuliffe, Fiona Devoy
    Judge, Frances M.
    Murphy, Jimmy
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2024, 374
  • [20] Bioactive Ceramic Coating Solution for Offshore Floating Wind Farms
    Sanz, D. S.
    Garcia, S.
    Trueba, L.
    Trueba, A.
    TRANSNAV-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON MARINE NAVIGATION AND SAFETY OF SEA TRANSPORTATION, 2021, 15 (02) : 407 - 412