Appropriate port selection for floating based offshore wind farms with MCDM Methods: The Case of Turkiye

被引:0
|
作者
Canat, Ayse Nuray [1 ]
Ozkan, Coskun [1 ]
机构
[1] Yildiz Tech Univ, Fac Mech Engn, Dept Ind Engn, TR-34349 Besiktas, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
Port selection for floating offshore wind turbine; Full Consistency Method; Best Worst Method; CRADIS; Combined Compromise Solution;
D O I
10.17341/gazimmfd.1398232
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
In order for offshore wind power plants, which are one of the renewable energy branches, to provide optimum service, to be low cost and highly beneficial, the installation, operation and maintenance stages should be carried out in a suitable port close to the power plant. In this port selection process, the criteria that ports should have differ according to the turbine structure to be installed. In the literature, there is no study on port location selection for floating wind turbines. In this study, the characteristics that ports should have for the life cycle of floating wind turbines at sea are obtained by examining the studies in the literature. For the selection of suitable ports, the Full Consistency Method (FUCOM), Best Worst Method (BWM), Common Weighting Method, Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution (CRADIS), Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) and Borda Method were used to contribute to the decision making process. Comparative analyses with other MCDM (Multi-criteria decision making) methods have been carried out to select the appropriate port. In the study, container and Ro-Ro ports in Turkey were used since the port characteristics should be provided at least at minimum level. Samsunport in the Black Sea region was found to be the most suitable port for all three port types (terminal, service and response). The criterion of having a component production facility was found to be the most important criterion for floating based offshore power plant terminal port selection.
引用
收藏
页码:639 / 652
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Suitable site selection for offshore wind farms in Turkey’s seas: GIS-MCDM based approach
    Mustafa Serdar Genç
    Fatih Karipoğlu
    Kemal Koca
    Şükrü Taner Azgın
    Earth Science Informatics, 2021, 14 : 1213 - 1225
  • [2] Suitable site selection for offshore wind farms in Turkey's seas: GIS-MCDM based approach
    Genc, Mustafa Serdar
    Karipoglu, Fatih
    Koca, Kemal
    Azgin, Sukru Taner
    EARTH SCIENCE INFORMATICS, 2021, 14 (03) : 1213 - 1225
  • [3] Fault diagnosis of floating offshore wind farms, a benchmark case study
    Pena-Sanchez, Yerai
    Penalba, Markel
    Nava, Vincenzo
    Puig, Vicenc
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2023, 56 (02): : 3510 - 3515
  • [4] Sensitivity analysis of floating offshore wind farms
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Diaz-Casas, Vicente
    ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 101 : 271 - 277
  • [5] Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Filgueira-Vizoso, Almudena
    Carral-Couce, Luis
    Fraguela Formoso, Jose Angel
    ENERGY, 2016, 112 : 868 - 882
  • [6] Optimal layout design of floating offshore wind farms
    Froese, Gabrielle
    Ku, Shan Yu
    Kheirabadi, Ali C.
    Nagamune, Ryozo
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2022, 190 : 94 - 102
  • [7] Optimal floating offshore wind farms for Mediterranean islands
    Faraggiana, E.
    Ghigo, A.
    Sirigu, M.
    Petracca, E.
    Giorgi, G.
    Mattiazzo, G.
    Bracco, G.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2024, 221
  • [8] Economic feasibility of floating offshore wind farms in Portugal
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Silva, Dina
    Bento, A. Rute
    Salvacao, N.
    Soares, C. Guedes
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2020, 207
  • [9] Economic influence of location in floating offshore wind farms
    Castro-Santos, Laura
    Diaz-Casas, Vicente
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2015, 107 : 13 - 22
  • [10] Floating offshore wind turbines port requirements for construction
    Crowle, A. P.
    Thies, P. R.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART M-JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR THE MARITIME ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 236 (04) : 1047 - 1056